Literature DB >> 18936688

Phenotypic alterations in ductal carcinoma in situ-associated myoepithelial cells: biologic and diagnostic implications.

Justin B Hilson1, Stuart J Schnitt, Laura C Collins.   

Abstract

Recent molecular studies have indicated that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-associated myoepithelial cells (MECs) show differences from MECs in normal breast tissue. Such alterations may influence the progression of DCIS to invasive cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate further phenotypic alterations in DCIS-associated MECs. Paraffin sections of 101 cases of DCIS (56 without and 45 with associated invasive carcinoma) were immunostained for 7 MEC markers: smooth muscle actin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), calponin, p63, cytokeratin (CK) 5/6, CD10, and p75. In each case, the distribution and intensity of staining for each marker in DCIS-associated MECs was compared with that in MECs surrounding normal ductal-lobular structures on the same slide. In 85 cases (84.2%), DCIS-associated MECs showed decreased expression of one or more MEC markers when compared with normal MECs. The proportion of cases that showed reduced expression was 76.5% for SMMHC, 34.0% for CD10, 30.2% for CK5/6, 17.4% for calponin, 12.6% for p63, 4.2% for p75, and 1% for smooth muscle actin. Reduced MEC expression of SMMHC was significantly more frequent in high grade than in non-high-grade DCIS (84.8% vs. 61.5% of cases, P=0.01). We conclude that DCIS-associated MECs show immunophenotypic differences from MECs surrounding normal mammary ductal-lobular structures. The biologic significance of this remains to be determined. However, these results indicate that the sensitivity of some MEC markers is lower in DCIS-associated MECs than in normal MECs. This observation should be taken into consideration when selecting MEC markers to help distinguish in situ from invasive breast carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18936688     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318180431d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  24 in total

1.  Consistency in recognizing microinvasion in breast carcinomas is improved by immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial markers.

Authors:  G Cserni; C A Wells; H Kaya; P Regitnig; A Sapino; G Floris; T Decker; M P Foschini; P J van Diest; D Grabau; A Reiner; J DeGaetano; E Chmielik; A Cordoba; X Andreu; V Zolota; E Charafe-Jauffret; A Ryska; Z Varga; N Weingertner; J P Bellocq; I Liepniece-Karele; G Callagy; J Kulka; H Bürger; P Figueiredo; J Wesseling; I Amendoeira; D Faverly; C M Quinn; S Bianchi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Invasive ductal carcinoma with in situ pattern: how to avoid this diagnostic pitfall?

Authors:  Narasimhamurthy Mohan; Jennifer O Black; Mary R Schwartz; Qihui Jim Zhai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Immunohistochemical expression of myoepithelial markers in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast: a unique paradoxical staining pattern of high-molecular weight cytokeratins.

Authors:  Suzuko Moritani; Shu Ichihara; Yasushi Yatabe; Masaki Hasegawa; Akari Iwakoshi; Waki Hosoda; Michihiko Narita; Yuichiro Nagai; Masami Asai; Nobuko Ujihira; Yoshiaki Yuba; Mayumi Jijiwa
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Analysis of the Transcriptome: Regulation of Cancer Stemness in Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Vitamin D Compounds.

Authors:  Naing Lin Shan; Audrey Minden; Philip Furmanski; Min Ji Bak; Li Cai; Roman Wernyj; Davit Sargsyan; David Cheng; Renyi Wu; Hsiao-Chen D Kuo; Shanyi N Li; Mingzhu Fang; Hubert Maehr; Ah-Ng Kong; Nanjoo Suh
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-05-28

5.  Low CD10 mRNA expression identifies high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Jérôme Toussaint; Virginie Durbecq; Sevilay Altintas; Valérie Doriath; Ghizlane Rouas; Marianne Paesmans; Philippe Bedard; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Wiebren A Tjalma; Denis Larsimont; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Early dysregulation of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Lyndsey A Emery; Anusri Tripathi; Chialin King; Maureen Kavanah; Jane Mendez; Michael D Stone; Antonio de las Morenas; Paola Sebastiani; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Accurate assessment of HER2 gene status for invasive component of breast cancer by combination of immunohistochemistry and chromogenic In Situ hybridization.

Authors:  Xiu Nie; Jun He; Yan Li; Dan-Zhen Pan; Hua-Xiong Pan; Mi-Xia Weng; Xiu-Ping Yang; Chun-Ping Liu; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-17

8.  Encapsulated apocrine papillary carcinoma of the breast--a tumour of uncertain malignant potential: report of five cases.

Authors:  Melanie Seal; Christine Wilson; Gregory J Naus; Stephen Chia; Terry C Bainbridge; Malcolm M Hayes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Elastic stains in the evaluation of DCIS with comedo necrosis in breast cancers.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Myoepithelial cell differentiation markers in ductal carcinoma in situ progression.

Authors:  Tanya D Russell; Sonali Jindal; Samiat Agunbiade; Dexiang Gao; Megan Troxell; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.