Literature DB >> 29101192

Fecal Microbiota Transplant from Highly Feed-Efficient Donors Shows Little Effect on Age-Related Changes in Feed-Efficiency-Associated Fecal Microbiota from Chickens.

Sina-Catherine Siegerstetter1, Renée M Petri1, Elizabeth Magowan2, Peadar G Lawlor3, Qendrim Zebeli1, Niamh E O'Connell4, Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli5.   

Abstract

Chickens with good or poor feed efficiency (FE) have been shown to differ in their intestinal microbiota composition. This study investigated differences in the fecal bacterial community of highly and poorly feed-efficient chickens at 16 and 29 days posthatch (dph) and evaluated whether a fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from feed-efficient donors early in life can affect the fecal microbiota in chickens at 16 and 29 dph and chicken FE and nutrient retention at 4 weeks of age. A total of 110 chickens were inoculated with a FMT or a control transplant (CT) on dph 1, 6, and 9 and ranked according to residual feed intake (RFI; the metric for FE) on 30 dph. Fifty-six chickens across both inoculation groups were selected as the extremes in RFI (29 low, 27 high). RFI-related fecal bacterial profiles were discernible at 16 and 29 dph. In particular, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus crispatus, and Anaerobacterium operational taxonomic units were associated with low RFI (good FE). Multiple administrations of the FMT only slightly changed the fecal bacterial composition, which was supported by weighted UniFrac analysis, showing similar bacterial communities in the feces of both inoculation groups at 16 and 29 dph. Moreover, the FMT did not change the RFI and nutrient retention of highly and poorly feed-efficient recipients, whereas it tended to increase feed intake and body weight gain in female chickens. This finding suggests that host- and environment-related factors may more strongly affect chicken fecal microbiota and FE than the FMT.IMPORTANCE Modulating the chicken's early microbial colonization using a FMT from highly feed-efficient donor chickens may be a promising tool to establish a more desirable bacterial profile in recipient chickens, thereby improving host FE. Although FE-associated fecal bacterial profiles at 16 and 29 dph could be established, the microbiota composition of a FMT, when administered early in life, may not be a strong factor modulating the fecal microbiota at 2 to 4 weeks of life and reducing the variation in chicken's FE. Nevertheless, the present FMT may have potential benefits for growth performance in female chickens.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chicken; fecal microbiota; fecal microbiota transplant; feed efficiency; nutrient retention

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29101192      PMCID: PMC5752867          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02330-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  36 in total

1.  UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison.

Authors:  Catherine Lozupone; Manuel E Lladser; Dan Knights; Jesse Stombaugh; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  High through put 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing analysis of the fecal microbiota of high FCR and low FCR broiler growers.

Authors:  K M Singh; T Shah; S Deshpande; S J Jakhesara; P G Koringa; D N Rank; C G Joshi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Description of Anaerobacterium chartisolvens gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic bacterium from Clostridium rRNA cluster III isolated from soil of a Japanese rice field, and reclassification of Bacteroides cellulosolvens Murray et al. 1984 as Pseudobacteroides cellulosolvens gen. nov., comb. nov.

Authors:  Haruka Horino; Takashi Fujita; Akio Tonouchi
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Taxonomic and gene-centric metagenomics of the fecal microbiome of low and high feed conversion ratio (FCR) broilers.

Authors:  K M Singh; T M Shah; Bhaskar Reddy; S Deshpande; D N Rank; C G Joshi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  In vitro fermentation of broiler cecal content: the role of lactobacilli and pH value on the composition of microbiota and end products fermentation.

Authors:  A Meimandipour; M Shuhaimi; M Hair-Bejo; K Azhar; B M Kabeir; B Rasti; A M Yazid
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice.

Authors:  Vanessa K Ridaura; Jeremiah J Faith; Federico E Rey; Jiye Cheng; Alexis E Duncan; Andrew L Kau; Nicholas W Griffin; Vincent Lombard; Bernard Henrissat; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Olga Ilkayeva; Clay F Semenkovich; Katsuhiko Funai; David K Hayashi; Barbara J Lyle; Margaret C Martini; Luke K Ursell; Jose C Clemente; William Van Treuren; William A Walters; Rob Knight; Christopher B Newgard; Andrew C Heath; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Mark S Geier; Honglei Chen; Robert J Hughes; Robert J Moore
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Bacteria within the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota Correlated with Improved Growth and Feed Conversion: Challenges Presented for the Identification of Performance Enhancing Probiotic Bacteria.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Robert J Hughes; Mark S Geier; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Quantitative genetic background of the host influences gut microbiomes in chickens.

Authors:  Lele Zhao; Gang Wang; Paul Siegel; Chuan He; Hezhong Wang; Wenjing Zhao; Zhengxiao Zhai; Fengwei Tian; Jianxin Zhao; Hao Zhang; Zikui Sun; Wei Chen; Yan Zhang; He Meng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  18 in total

1.  KOMB: K-core based de novo characterization of copy number variation in microbiomes.

Authors:  Advait Balaji; Nicolae Sapoval; Charlie Seto; R A Leo Elworth; Yilei Fu; Michael G Nute; Tor Savidge; Santiago Segarra; Todd J Treangen
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.155

2.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Reshapes the Physiological Function of the Intestine in Antibiotic-Treated Specific Pathogen-Free Birds.

Authors:  Peng Li; Mingkun Gao; Bochen Song; Yan Liu; Shaojia Yan; Jiaqi Lei; Yizhu Zhao; Guang Li; Tahir Mahmood; Zengpeng Lv; Yongfei Hu; Yuming Guo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Experimental Ulcerative Colitis Reveals Associated Gut Microbial and Host Metabolic Reprogramming.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiang Yan; Xue-Jiao Gao; Ting Li; Bin Wei; Pan-Pan Wang; Ying Yang; Ru Yan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Into the wild: microbiome transplant studies need broader ecological reality.

Authors:  Christopher J Greyson-Gaito; Timothy J Bartley; Karl Cottenie; Will M C Jarvis; Amy E M Newman; Mason R Stothart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  A Comparative Review on Microbiota Manipulation: Lessons From Fish, Plants, Livestock, and Human Research.

Authors:  Sylvia Brugman; Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo; Saskia Braber; Gert Folkerts; Corné M J Pieterse; Peter A H M Bakker
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-09-05

6.  Feed Restriction Modulates the Fecal Microbiota Composition, Nutrient Retention, and Feed Efficiency in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intake.

Authors:  Sina-Catherine Siegerstetter; Renée M Petri; Elizabeth Magowan; Peadar G Lawlor; Qendrim Zebeli; Niamh E O'Connell; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Fecal microbiota transplantation as a tool to treat and reduce susceptibility to disease in animals.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 8.  Composition and Function of Chicken Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Mortality in Porcine Circovirus Associated Disease.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder; Laura A Constance; Raymond R R Rowland; Waseem Abbas; Samodha C Fernando; Megan L Potter; Maureen A Sheahan; Thomas E Burkey; Richard A Hesse; Ada G Cino-Ozuna
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?

Authors:  Juan M Diaz Carrasco; Natalia A Casanova; Mariano E Fernández Miyakawa
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.