Literature DB >> 24136777

Taxonomic and gene-centric metagenomics of the fecal microbiome of low and high feed conversion ratio (FCR) broilers.

K M Singh1, T M Shah, Bhaskar Reddy, S Deshpande, D N Rank, C G Joshi.   

Abstract

Individual weight gain in broiler growers appears to vary, which may in part be due to variation in their gut microbiota. In this paper we analyse the fecal microbiota of low and high feed conversion ratio (FCR) broilers. After shotgun sequencing of the fecal microbiome, we used the SEED database to identify the microbial diversity and metabolic potential in low and high FCR birds. The domain-level breakdown of our samples was bacteria (>95 %), eukaryotes (>2 %), archaea (>0.2 %), and viruses (>0.2 %). At the phylum level, Proteobacteria (78.83 % in low and 52.04 % in high FCR), Firmicutes (11.97 % in low and 27.53 % in high FCR) and Bacteroidetes (7.10 % in low FCR and 17.53 % in high FCR) predominated in the fecal microbial community. Poultry fecal metagenomes revealed the sequences related to 33 genera in both low and high FCR with significantly different proportion. Functional analysis revealed that genes for the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids and derivatives and protein metabolism were most abundant in SEED subsystem in both samples. Genes associated with stress, virulence, cell wall and cell capsule were also abundant. Indeed, genes associated with sulphur assimilation, flagellum and flagellar motility were over represented in low FCR birds. This information could help in developing strategies to improve feed efficiency and feed formulation for broiler chickens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136777     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-013-0179-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  43 in total

1.  Extensive profiling of a complex microbial community by high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  Janet E Hill; Robyn P Seipp; Martin Betts; Lindsay Hawkins; Andrew G Van Kessel; William L Crosby; Sean M Hemmingsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets.

Authors:  G B Havenstein; P R Ferket; M A Qureshi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Metagenomic analysis of Surti buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) rumen: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Krishna M Singh; Viral B Ahir; Ajai K Tripathi; Umed V Ramani; Manisha Sajnani; Prakash G Koringa; Subhash Jakhesara; Paresh R Pandya; Dharamsi N Rank; Duggirala S Murty; Ramesh K Kothari; Chaitanya G Joshi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Jennifer M Brulc; Dionysios A Antonopoulos; Margret E Berg Miller; Melissa K Wilson; Anthony C Yannarell; Elizabeth A Dinsdale; Robert E Edwards; Edward D Frank; Joanne B Emerson; Pirjo Wacklin; Pedro M Coutinho; Bernard Henrissat; Karen E Nelson; Bryan A White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  High through put 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing analysis of the fecal microbiota of high FCR and low FCR broiler growers.

Authors:  K M Singh; T Shah; S Deshpande; S J Jakhesara; P G Koringa; D N Rank; C G Joshi
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 6.  The intestinal microflora of poultry and game birds during life and after storage. Address of the president of the Society for Applied Bacteriology delivered at a meeting of the society on 10 January 1979.

Authors:  E M Barnes
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1979-06

7.  Maternal diet influences gene expression in intestine of offspring in chicken (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Johanna M J Rebel; Saskia Van Hemert; Arjan J W Hoekman; Francis R M Balk; Norbert Stockhofe-Zurwieden; Dirk Bakker; Mari A Smits
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.320

8.  Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed Eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends.

Authors:  E O Oviedo-Rondón; M E Hume; C Hernández; S Clemente-Hernández
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Poultry digestive microflora biodiversity as indicated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  M E Hume; L F Kubena; T S Edrington; C J Donskey; R W Moore; S C Ricke; D J Nisbet
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Phylogenetic and gene-centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice.

Authors:  Kelly S Swanson; Scot E Dowd; Jan S Suchodolski; Ingmar S Middelbos; Brittany M Vester; Kathleen A Barry; Karen E Nelson; Manolito Torralba; Bernard Henrissat; Pedro M Coutinho; Isaac K O Cann; Bryan A White; George C Fahey
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 10.302

View more
  36 in total

1.  Phylogenetic and functional alterations in bacterial community compositions in broiler ceca as a result of mannan oligosaccharide supplementation.

Authors:  A Corrigan; Marcel de Leeuw; Stéphanie Penaud-Frézet; Diliana Dimova; R A Murphy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Omics approaches in food safety: fulfilling the promise?

Authors:  Teresa M Bergholz; Andrea I Moreno Switt; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 17.079

3.  Characterization of Candida famata Isolated from Poultry Feces for Possible Probiotic Applications.

Authors:  Alaa Al-Seraih; Christophe Flahaut; François Krier; Benoit Cudennec; Djamel Drider
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Fecal Microbiota Transplant from Highly Feed-Efficient Donors Shows Little Effect on Age-Related Changes in Feed-Efficiency-Associated Fecal Microbiota from Chickens.

Authors:  Sina-Catherine Siegerstetter; Renée M Petri; Elizabeth Magowan; Peadar G Lawlor; Qendrim Zebeli; Niamh E O'Connell; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Application of a simple measuring method to evaluate the fecal microflora of dairy cows in the summer season.

Authors:  Miki Amimoto; Yoshimitsu Ouchi; Miki Okita; Takashi Hirota; Yoshimi Imura; Takashi Bungo
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  Successional changes in the chicken cecal microbiome during 42 days of growth are independent of organic acid feed additives.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; R Jeff Buhr; Casey W Ritz; Brian H Kiepper; Mark E Berrang; Bruce S Seal; Nelson A Cox
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Variations of Phosphorous Accessibility Causing Changes in Microbiome Functions in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Chickens.

Authors:  Bruno Tilocca; Maren Witzig; Markus Rodehutscord; Jana Seifert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial and Temporal Changes in the Broiler Chicken Cecal and Fecal Microbiomes and Correlations of Bacterial Taxa with Cytokine Gene Expression.

Authors:  Brian B Oakley; Michael H Kogut
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-02-19

9.  Differential fecal microbiota are retained in broiler chicken lines divergently selected for fatness traits.

Authors:  Qiangchuan Hou; Lai-Yu Kwok; Yi Zheng; Lifeng Wang; Zhuang Guo; Jiachao Zhang; Weiqiang Huang; Yuxiang Wang; Li Leng; Hui Li; Heping Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Functional gene arrays-based analysis of fecal microbiomes in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yanfei Chen; Nan Qin; Jing Guo; Guirong Qian; Daiqiong Fang; Ding Shi; Min Xu; Fengling Yang; Zhili He; Joy D Van Nostrand; Tong Yuan; Ye Deng; Jizhong Zhou; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.