Literature DB >> 29100625

Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes.

Cara K Bradley1, Mark Livingstone2, Maria V Traversa2, Steven J McArthur2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on clinical outcomes.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Private fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) patients undergoing comprehensive chromosome screening, including monogenic disorder and chromosome rearrangement cases. INTERVENTION(S): Warming and transfer of euploid blastocysts biopsied and vitrified-warmed once (group 1 [G1, control]; n = 2,130), biopsied once but vitrified-warmed twice (group 2 [G2]; n = 34), or biopsied and vitrified-warmed twice (group 3 [G3]; n = 29). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Thaw (for transfer) survival rate and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). RESULT(S): The thaw survival rates were 98.4% for G1, 97.3% for G2, and 93.3% for G3, with once biopsied and vitrified-warmed embryos being significantly higher than twice biopsied and vitrified-warmed embryos (G1 vs. G3; P=.032). There was a slight reduction in CPR with an additional vitrification-warming (G1 54.3% vs. G2 47.1%) and larger reduction with an additional embryo biopsy (G2 47.1% vs. G3 31.0%), but neither difference was statistically significant. However, the combined effect of both additional biopsy and vitrification-warming resulted in a significantly reduced CPR (G1 54.3% vs. G3 31.0%; P=.013). CONCLUSION(S): This study indicates that blastocysts biopsied and vitrified-warmed twice have reduced clinical outcomes compared with blastocysts biopsied and vitrified-warmed once. PGD patients should be advised that performing a second biopsy and vitrification-warming in cases of failure to obtain a result from initial biopsy will reduce the chance of pregnancy. Patients with inherited disorders may elect to proceed with the second biopsy and vitrification to avoid transfer of embryos with the genetic condition.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; preimplantation genetic screening; trophectoderm biopsy; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29100625     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy.

Authors:  Shelby A Neal; L Sun; C Jalas; S J Morin; T A Molinaro; R T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Combined noninvasive metabolic and spindle imaging as potential tools for embryo and oocyte assessment.

Authors:  Tim Sanchez; Marta Venturas; S Ali Aghvami; Xingbo Yang; Seth Fraden; Denny Sakkas; Daniel J Needleman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains-the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives.

Authors:  Steve Grkovic; Maria V Traversa; Mark Livingstone; Steven J McArthur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Increased copy number of syncytin-1 in the trophectoderm is associated with implantation of the blastocyst.

Authors:  Luyan Guo; Fang Gu; Yan Xu; Canquan Zhou
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Cryopreservation Does Not Affect the Clinical Pregnancy Rate of Blastocysts Derived from Vitrified Oocytes.

Authors:  Hadi Ramadan; Tarita Pakrashi; Andrea R Thurman; Kimball O Pomeroy; Gerard Celia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Time from trophectoderm biopsy to vitrification affects the developmental competence of biopsied blastocysts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Miki; Kenji Ezoe; Shizu Kouraba; Kazuki Ohata; Keiichi Kato
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  "Double Frozen Transfer" Could Influence the Perinatal and Children's Growth: A Nested Case-Control Study of 6705 Live Birth Cycles.

Authors:  Jie Gao; Yiyuan Zhang; Linlin Cui; Tao Zhang; Bingjie Wu; Shanshan Gao; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.055

9.  Freeze all-first versus biopsy-first: A retrospective analysis of frozen blastocyst transfer cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Authors:  Eun Jeong Yu; Eun-A Park; Seung-Ah Choe; Kyung-Ah Lee; You Shin Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies.

Authors:  Rostislav Navratil; Jakub Horak; Miroslav Hornak; David Kubicek; Maria Balcova; Gabriela Tauwinklova; Pavel Travnik; Katerina Vesela
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.025

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.