Literature DB >> 35460491

Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains-the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives.

Steve Grkovic1, Maria V Traversa2, Mark Livingstone2, Steven J McArthur2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Does re-biopsy of blastocysts classified as abnormal (ABN) due to segmental aneuploidy (SA) have clinical utility?
METHODS: The live birth (LB) outcomes of mosaic SAs, compared to other categories, were determined after transfer of 3084 PGT-A tested blastocysts. An initial 12-month trial thawed 111 blastocysts classified as ABN due to a SA for clinical re-biopsy, with an additional 58 from a subsequent 16-month revised protocol. Where re-biopsy failed to corroborate the original classification, blastocysts were reported as mosaic and suitable for clinical use.
RESULTS: Segmental mosaics had a LB rate (54.1%) which was indistinguishable from that of euploid (53.7%). Numeric mosaics had statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduced LB rates compared to euploid, with high-level numerics (19.2%) also exhibiting a significant reduction compared to low level (42.3%). Of the initial 111 blastocysts with SAs, 85 could be re-biopsied. Segmental gains became suitable for re-biopsy at a high rate (90.9%), with 84.2% (16/19) of these reclassified as mosaic. Only 73.0% of deletions and complex changes were suitable for re-biopsy, of which 73.0% (46/63) were confirmed ABN. The subsequent 16-month period primarily focused on gains, confirming the high rate at which they can be reclassified as clinically useable.
CONCLUSIONS: Blastocysts harboring mosaic segmental duplications, rather than SAs in general, are the primary source of false-positive PGT-A results and represent a category with a LB rate similar to that of euploid. A high degree of confidence in the reliability of PGT-A results can be maintained by performing confirmatory clinical TE biopsies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical re-biopsy; False positives; Mosaicism; Preimplantation genetic testing; Segmental aneuploidy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35460491      PMCID: PMC9174409          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02487-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  31 in total

1.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A molecular strategy for routine preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation carriers.

Authors:  M V Traversa; L Carey; D Leigh
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Chapter 20 Gavi-Automated Vitrification Instrument.

Authors:  Tammie K Roy; Susanna Brandi; Teija T Peura
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

4.  Prevalence and authenticity of de-novo segmental aneuploidy (>16 Mb) in human blastocysts as detected by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Shuang Zhou; Dehua Cheng; Qi Ouyang; Pingyuan Xie; Changfu Lu; Fei Gong; Liang Hu; Yueqiu Tan; Guangxiu Lu; Ge Lin
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  When next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) yields an inconclusive report: diagnostic results and clinical outcomes after re biopsy.

Authors:  Shelby A Neal; L Sun; C Jalas; S J Morin; T A Molinaro; R T Scott
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Detection of segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism in the human preimplantation embryo: technical considerations and limitations.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Jason M Franasiak
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Permanence of de novo segmental aneuploidy in sequential embryo biopsies.

Authors:  M C Magli; C Albanese; A Crippa; G Terzuoli; G La Sala; C Tabanelli; L Gianaroli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Blastocyst trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial monogenic disorders and chromosomal translocations.

Authors:  S J McArthur; D Leigh; J T Marshall; A J Gee; K A De Boer; R P S Jansen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Donald F Conrad; Dalila Pinto; Richard Redon; Lars Feuk; Omer Gokcumen; Yujun Zhang; Jan Aerts; T Daniel Andrews; Chris Barnes; Peter Campbell; Tomas Fitzgerald; Min Hu; Chun Hwa Ihm; Kati Kristiansson; Daniel G Macarthur; Jeffrey R Macdonald; Ifejinelo Onyiah; Andy Wing Chun Pang; Sam Robson; Kathy Stirrups; Armand Valsesia; Klaudia Walter; John Wei; Chris Tyler-Smith; Nigel P Carter; Charles Lee; Stephen W Scherer; Matthew E Hurles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  D Babariya; E Fragouli; S Alfarawati; K Spath; D Wells
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.