| Literature DB >> 29098763 |
Julia de Bruyn1,2, Brigitte Bagnol1,2,3,4, Ian Darnton-Hill2,5, Wende Maulaga6, Peter C Thomson1, Robyn Alders1,2,3.
Abstract
Suboptimal breastfeeding practices, early initiation of complementary feeding, and monotonous cereal-based diets have been implicated as contributors to continuing high rates of child undernutrition in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutrition-sensitive interventions, including agricultural programs that increase access to nutrient-rich vegetables, legumes, and animal-source foods, have the potential to achieve sustainable improvements in children's diets. In the quest to evaluate the efficacy of such programs in improving growth and development in the first 2 years of life, there is a role for mixed methods research to better understand existing infant and young child feeding practices. This analysis forms part of a longitudinal study assessing the impact of improvements to poultry health and crop production on diets and growth of 503 randomly selected children from eight rural communities in Manyoni District in central Tanzania. Using an explanatory sequential design, the quantitative phase of data collection was conducted between May 2014 and May 2016, comprising six monthly structured questionnaires, four monthly household-level documentation of chicken and egg consumption, and fortnightly records of children's breastfeeding status. The subsequent qualitative phase involved in-depth interviews with a subset of 39 mothers in October 2016. Breastfeeding was almost universal (96.8%) and of long duration (mean = 21.7 months, SD = 3.6), but early initiation of complementary feeding was also common (74.4%; mean = 4.0 months, SD = 1.8), overwhelmingly driven by maternal perceptions of insufficient milk supply (95.0%). Chicken and eggs were infrequently eaten, but close associations between maternal and child consumption patterns (p < .001) suggest the potential for strategies that increase household-level consumption to bring nutritional benefits to young children.Entities:
Keywords: breastfeeding; complementary feeding; cultural context; infant and child nutrition; infant feeding decisions; low income countries animal-source food
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29098763 PMCID: PMC6866118 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12550
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Figure 1Overview of administrative units in the study area, with the number of enrolled households and the timing of quantitative and qualitative data collection (including the 6‐month delay between baseline data collection in the two wards)
Figure 2Design of pictorial record chart (with English translations of Swahili text) for completion by a representative of each household, to indicate the consumption of poultry products by children enrolled in the study, and a pregnant or breastfeeding woman within the same household
Overview of selected demographic characteristics, using baseline questionnaire data: overall, by ward, and in the subset participating in in‐depth interviews
| Sanza Ward | Majiri Ward | Overall | In‐depth interviews | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of households ( | 229 | 274 | 503 | 39 |
| Date of data collection | May 2014 | Nov 2014 | Oct 2016 | |
| Children | ||||
| Age at enrolment (months), mean ( | 9.9 (6.1) | 7.6 (4.3) | 8.6 (5.3) | 8.4 (5.6) |
| Female (%) | 55.5 | 47.4 | 51.1 | 35.9 |
| Stunting at baseline (%) | 36.8 | 28.5 | 32.2 | 41.7 |
| HAZ at baseline, mean ( | −1.5 (1.2) | −1.5 (1.1) | −1.5 (1.2) | −1.7 (1.6) |
| Mothers | ||||
| Age at baseline (years), mean ( | 28.5 (7.5) | 26.8 (7.5) | 27.7 (7.6) | 28.9 (7.7) |
| No formal education (%) | 22.8 | 40.6 | 32.5 | 39.5 |
| Households | ||||
| Female headed (%) | 30.2 | 16.4 | 22.7 | 15.8 |
| Number of members, mean ( | 5.4 (1.9) | 5.5 (2.6) | 5.4 (2.3) | 5.8 (2.4) |
| Language group (%) | ||||
| Gogo | 78.2 | 74.8 | 76.3 | 76.9 |
| Sukuma | 6.1 | 14.6 | 10.7 | 23.1 |
| Other | 4.4 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 0.0 |
| Not specified | 11.4 | 8.0 | 9.5 | 0.0 |
| Livestock ownership at baseline (%) | ||||
| Chickens | 51.1 | 46.8 | 48.8 | 65.8 |
| Goats and sheep | 27.1 | 47.8 | 38.3 | 36.8 |
| Cattle | 26.7 | 36.2 | 31.8 | 47.4 |
Note. SD = standard deviation; HAZ = height‐for‐age z‐score; Significant differences (p < .05) are indicated as follows:
Between the two wards.
Between the overall sample and the subset participating in in‐depth interviews.
Childbirth, breastfeeding, and early complementary feeding practices of enrolled children in the overall study population and by ward, compiled from six monthly questionnaire responses and fortnightly household visits to record children's breastfeeding status
| Sanza Ward | Majiri Ward | Overall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrolled children ( | 229 | 274 | 503 |
| Delivered by caesarean section (%) | 3.5 | 7.4 | 5.6 |
| Delivered at home (%) | 35.7 | 29.8 | 32.5 |
| Weighed at health facility within 1 hr of delivery (%) | 27.2 | 5.1 | 16.2 |
| Ever breastfed (%) | 94.7 | 98.5 | 96.8 |
| Breastfeeding initiated within 1 hr (%) | 67.5 | 85.2 | 77.5 |
| Breastfeeding initiated within 24 hr (%) | 88.5 | 98.5 | 93.9 |
| Prelacteal feeding (%) | 46.5 | 35.8 | 40.7 |
| Water with sugar (%) | 29.4 | 27.8 | 28.5 |
| Water with sugar and salt (%) | 13.2 | 3.7 | 8.0 |
| Tea (%) | 1.8 | 3.3 | 2.6 |
| Milk other than human breast milk (%) | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Plain water (%) | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Age in months at initiation of complementary feeding | |||
| Mean ( | 4.2 (1.9) | 3.8 (1.7) | 4.0 (1.8) |
| Range | 1–11 | 1–9 | 1–11 |
| Exclusively breastfed until 6 months (%) | 29.8 | 22.1 | 25.6 |
| Reasons for early initiation of complementary feeding (%) | |||
| Insufficient breast milk | 89.7 | 98.0 | 95.0 |
| Child refused breast milk | 6.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
| Maternal illness | 3.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 |
| Separation of mother and child | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Items commonly added to porridge during early complementary feeding | |||
| Sugar | 77.8 | 86.9 | 83.3 |
| Nuts or beans | 30.4 | 56.3 | 46.0 |
| Baobab fruit | 12.6 | 17.0 | 15.2 |
| Cow's milk | 8.1 | 12.6 | 10.9 |
| Oil | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Egg | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Meat | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Age in months at weaning | |||
| Mean ( | 22.0 (3.5) | 21.3 (3.6) | 21.7 (3.6) |
| Range | 11–36 | 11–29 | 11–36 |
| Breastfeeding continued until 24 months (%) | 38.4 | 30.5 | 34.5 |
Note. SD = standard deviation.
Figure 3Mothers' experiences of breastfeeding, according to the age of their child at initiation of complementary feeding (qualitative data collected through in‐depth interviews)
Consumption frequency of selected food items, with associated reasons for and barriers to consumption, compiled from in‐depth interviews with mothers. Findings are presented alongside corresponding food group‐based recommendations for Tanzania
| Food group‐based recommendations for adults in Tanzania (TFNC, | Food item discussed with interviewees | Reported consumption frequency | Reported reasons to consume | Reported barriers to consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Animal‐source foods and legumes 2–3 servings per day One serving is equal to
A single egg A palm‐sized piece of meat or fish 250 ml milk Half a cup of cooked beans | Eggs | Infrequent consumption by majority of interviewed households (from “never” to “occasionally”). Three women reported eggs to be eaten on a regular basis, every 1–2 weeks. One mother said eggs would be given preferentially to children and particularly to young children. | Availability. A common circumstance for consuming eggs would be when a hen has died or abandoned her eggs or has laid more than she might be able to raise as chicks. One woman described having added egg to her child's porridge to improve her growth, and two others mentioned eggs as a beneficial food for children. | Not owning chickens or owning a small number only. No interviewees mentioned buying eggs to eat. Most women emphasised the need to keep eggs for hatching. (“If you eat eggs, where will you get chickens?”). There was one mention of the significance of language group, with the suggestion that it is not customary for Sukuma families to eat eggs. |
| Chicken meat | Substantial variation between households. Only four women indicated chickens to be slaughtered with any regularity, ranging from once per month to three times per week. For others, consumption was mostly associated with special occasions. | Large flock size and the ease of slaughtering chickens at home were cited by those consuming chickens on a regular basis. Visiting guests and special occasions (e.g., public holidays or weddings) were common reasons to eat chicken. Two women said chickens would be consumed at times of vegetable scarcity. Two reported chickens would only be eaten if they died of disease. | Decision‐making on the consumption or sale of chickens was reported to commonly involve the male household head. An emphasis on the need to retain chickens for sale in times of need was a common barrier to more frequent consumption. One woman from a large household indicated the number of chickens required to feed all household members to be a deterrent. | |
| Other meat or fish | Marked variation between households. Meat or fish were reported to be eaten three times per week by three interviewees and once per week by two. For the majority, consumption was much less frequent: once per month, once every 3 months, or even once per year. | Three women indicated meat consumption to depend on the availability of income. One interviewee indicated her husband's role as a butcher to facilitate access to meat in their household. Two said small dried fish would be eaten when vegetables were not available. | Lack of money available to purchase meat is the primary constraint to consumption. One Sukuma woman identified the requirement to involve a butcher in the slaughter process as a deterrent, compared to the ease with which chickens could be slaughtered at home. | |
| Milk | Marked variation according to cattle ownership and seasonal availability. Milk was reported to be consumed infrequently or never by those not owning cattle and commonly but with seasonal variation in the frequency and volume (usually two to three times daily in the wet season) by those owning cattle. | Cow's milk is seen as a suitable alternative or supplement to human breast milk and was commonly reported as an early complementary food (boiled or added to porridge) by those with cattle. Several women indicated cow's milk would be given to young infants left in the care of others during the day while their mother was engaged in agricultural work. One mother reported milk to have been given to help her daughter grow. | Not owning cattle, a lack of funds to buy milk and limited availability for sale were identified as common barriers. For cattle‐owning households, the amount of milk was said to vary considerably between seasons, according to feed availability and the reproductive status of cows. One mother indicated the milk from a cow to vary from 200 ml per day towards the end of the dry season to 2 L in the wet season. | |
| Beans | Marked variation: rarely in some households, three times weekly in others. One mother indicated beans would be given preferentially to children, when available. | Enjoyed by children. One mother described adding beans to her child's porridge to promote growth, as instructed by health staff. Another said eating beans would be more common when green leafy vegetables were not available (e.g., towards the end of the dry season). | Lack of funds to purchase from local markets. Beans were not grown by any of the interviewed households. Decreased consumption was described in the previous year, when poor rainfall adversely impacted agricultural yields and household income. | |
|
Cereals and tubers 6–11 servings per day One serving is equal to a fist‐sized portion of cooked sweet potatoes. | Sweet potatoes | Marked variation between households, particularly between the two predominant language groups of the study area (Sukuma and Gogo). In Sukuma households, sweet potatoes are commonly eaten as the first meal of the day. | Both white‐ and orange‐fleshed varieties were reported to be enjoyed. One interviewee described children putting on weight at times of year when sweet potatoes are being eaten. | Not commonly grown by members of Gogo households, for the suggested reason (from members of both language groups) that the cultivation techniques are arduous, particularly without access to draught power. One Gogo mother reported sweet potatoes to cause bloating in her children. |
|
Vegetables 3–5 servings per day One serving is equal to a palm‐sized portion of cooked vegetables. | Green leafy vegetables |
Universally commonly consumed. All women reported eating green leafy vegetables on a daily or twice‐daily basis for most of the year, usually as the main (and sometimes the only) accompaniment to the staple carbohydrate. | Availability. A range of both cultivated and noncultivated green leafy vegetables are eaten. Examples given included amaranth, sweet potato leaves, jute mallow, and | Unavailability. Green leafy vegetables are commonly harvested and dried in April, after the rains. There may be times later in the year, towards the end of the dry season, when the supply of dry leaves has been exhausted and fresh leaves are not yet available. |
|
Fruit 2–4 servings per day One serving is equal to
A single orange or banana A palm‐sized piece of watermelon or papaya | Fruit | Not commonly consumed, except for baobab fruit. Varying frequency according to households' financial capacity to purchase fruit at local markets and the seasonal availability of noncultivated fruits. | Enjoyed by children. Powder from baobab fruit was commonly reported to be added to children's porridge in the early phase of complementary feeding, together with sugar, to enhance the flavour. One mother cited fruit as being beneficial for children's growth. | Lack of disposable income for the purchase of fruit such as bananas from local markets. Wild fruits are only available at certain times of year. Two interviewees reported the sale of baobab fruit to be prioritised over home consumption, to fund the purchase of staple foods. |
Consumption of poultry products by enrolled children and breastfeeding women in Sanza Ward, by month of data collection (based on pictorial record charts completed by households)
| Aug 2014 | Dec 2014 | Apr 2015 | Aug 2015 | Dec 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Completed dietary records ( | |||||
| Enrolled children | 200 | 197 | 206 | 177 | 147 |
| Breastfeeding women | 202 | 192 | 153 | 83 | 64 |
| All participants | |||||
| Chicken eaten at least once in month (%) | |||||
| Enrolled children | 21.5 | 16.2 | 14.6 | 13.0 | 14.3 |
| Breastfeeding women | 22.8 | 16.7 | 18.3 | 12.0 | 12.5 |
| Eggs eaten at least once in month (%) | |||||
| Enrolled children | 18.0 | 7.1 | 10.7 | 14.8 | 14.3 |
| Breastfeeding women | 15.3 | 7.8 | 9.8 | 15.0 | 19.0 |
| Participants consuming poultry products in given month | |||||
| No. meals with chicken in month, mean ( | |||||
| Enrolled children | 2.3 (1.6) | 1.8 (1.1) | 2.3 (1.9) | 2.5 (2.2) | 2.6 (1.5) |
| Breastfeeding women | 2.3 (1.6) | 1.8 (1.1) | 2.0 (1.8) | 2.2 (3.0) | 3.5 (2.5) |
| No. meals with eggs in month, mean ( | |||||
| Enrolled children | 3.0 (2.0) | 1.5 (0.6) | 2.2 (1.0) | 3.1 (2.7) | 5.1 (5.5) |
| Breastfeeding women | 3.1 (1.9) | 1.5 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.8) | 3.3 (3.6) | 7.7 (7.0) |
Note. SD = standard deviation.
Exclusively breastfed children excluded from analyses (six children in August 2014 and one child in December 2014).
Figure 4Predicted number of meals containing poultry products consumed by children per month, according to maternal consumption frequency (based on pictorial record charts completed by households)
Regression coefficients and variance components from Poisson generalised linear mixed models indicating the number of meals containing poultry products consumed by a mother to be a significant predictor for the number consumed by her child. Separate models have been used for (a) chicken meat and (b) eggs
| (a) Chicken ( | (b) Eggs ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed effect | Coeff |
| Fixed effect | Coeff |
| ||
| Constant | −3.153 | 0.516 | Constant | −3.528 | 0.469 | ||
| No. of meals per month consumed by child's mother | 0 | 0 | — | No. of meals per month consumed by child's mother | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | 2.995 | 0.250 | 1 | 3.494 | 0.295 | ||
| 2 | 3.738 | 0.237 | 2 | 4.221 | 0.276 | ||
| 3 | 4.185 | 0.307 | 3 | 4.531 | 0.293 | ||
| 4 | 4.478 | 0.292 | 4 | 4.809 | 0.284 | ||
| 5 | 4.447 | 0.318 | 5 | 5.137 | 0.304 | ||
| 6 | 4.834 | 0.298 | 6 | 5.32 | 0.293 | ||
| 7 | 5.169 | 0.473 | 7 | 5.474 | 0.442 | ||
| 8 | — | — | 8 | 5.607 | 0.339 | ||
| 9 | 5.496 | 0.459 | 12 | 5.648 | 0.304 | ||
| 10 | 5.345 | 0.394 | 14 | 6.167 | 0.352 | ||
| 25 | 6.706 | 0.307 | |||||
Note. SE = standard error; Coeff = coefficient.