Literature DB >> 29098444

What is a task? An ideomotor perspective.

Stefan Künzell1, Laura Broeker2, David Dignath3, Harald Ewolds4, Markus Raab2,5, Roland Thomaschke3.   

Abstract

Although multitasking has been the subject of a large number of papers and experiments, the term task is still not well defined. In this opinion paper, we adopt the ideomotor perspective to define the term task and distinguish it from the terms goal and action. In our opinion, actions are movements executed by an actor to achieve a concrete goal. Concrete goals are represented as anticipated sensory consequences that are associated with an action in an ideomotor manner. Concrete goals are nested in a hierarchy of more and more abstract goals, which form the context of the corresponding action. Finally, tasks are depersonalized goals, i.e., goals that should be achieved by someone. However, tasks can be assigned to a specific person or group of persons, either by a third party or by the person or the group of persons themselves. By accepting this assignment, the depersonalized task becomes a personal goal. In our opinion, research on multitasking needs to confine its scope to the analysis of concrete tasks, which result in concrete goals as anticipated sensory consequences of the corresponding action. We further argue that the distinction between dual- and single-tasking is dependent on the subjective conception of the task assignment, the goal representation and previous experience. Finally, we conclude that it is not the tasks, but the performing of the tasks, i.e. the actions that cause costs in multitasking experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098444     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0942-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  41 in total

1.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.

Authors:  F Mechsner; D Kerzel; G Knoblich; W Prinz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Strategic capacity sharing between two tasks: evidence from tasks with the same and with different task sets.

Authors:  Carola Lehle; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

7.  Allocation of attention and dual-task effects on upper and lower limb task performance in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Tara L McIsaac; Benjapol Benjapalakorn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Incidental learning and task boundaries.

Authors:  Michael Freedberg; Tana T Wagschal; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Mark Van Selst; James C Johnston; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-11-17

10.  The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-01-06
View more
  9 in total

1.  Element-level features in conjoint episodes in dual-tasking.

Authors:  Lasse Pelzer; Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Both Improve Dual Task Performance in a Continuous Pursuit Tracking Task.

Authors:  Harald E Ewolds; Laura Bröker; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab; Stefan Künzell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-22

3.  The Problem of the Task. Pseudo-Interactivity as an Experimental Paradigm of Phenomenological Psychology.

Authors:  Alexander Nicolai Wendt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  The Psychophysiology of Action: A Multidisciplinary Endeavor for Integrating Action and Cognition.

Authors:  Sven Hoffmann; Uirassu Borges; Laura Bröker; Sylvain Laborde; Roman Liepelt; Babett H Lobinger; Jonna Löffler; Lisa Musculus; Markus Raab
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-29

5.  Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.

Authors:  Patricia Hirsch; Iring Koch; Julia Karbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  No impact of instructions and feedback on task integration in motor learning.

Authors:  Harald Ewolds; Laura Broeker; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab; Stefan Künzell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-08

7.  The impact of predictability on dual-task performance and implications for resource-sharing accounts.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Stefan Künzell; Markus Raab
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-04

8.  Ways to Improve Multitasking: Effects of Predictability after Single- and Dual-Task Training.

Authors:  Harald Ewolds; Laura Broeker; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab; Stefan Künzell
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-01-07

9.  Learning of across- and within-task contingencies modulates partial-repetition costs in dual-tasking.

Authors:  Lasse Pelzer; Christoph Naefgen; Robert Gaschler; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.