Literature DB >> 29098289

Estimates of Incidence and Prevalence of Visual Impairment, Low Vision, and Blindness in the United States.

Tiffany Chan1, David S Friedman2, Chris Bradley1, Robert Massof1.   

Abstract

Importance: Updated estimates of the prevalence and incidence rates of low vision and blindness are needed to inform policy makers and develop plans to meet the future demands for low vision rehabilitation services. Objective: To provide updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of low vision and blindness in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: Visual acuity measurements as a function of age from the 2007-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, with representation of racial and ethnic groups, were used to estimate the prevalence and incidence of visual impairments. Data from 6016 survey participants, ranging in age from younger than 18 years to older than 45 years, were obtained to estimate prevalence rates for different age groups. Incidence and prevalence rates of low vision (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] in the better-seeing eye of <20/40 and <20/60) and blindness (BCVA of ≤20/200) in older adults were estimated from exponential models, fit to prevalence rates as a function of age (specified in 5-year age bins). The prevalence and annual incidence of low vision and blindness in the United States were estimated, using the 2010 US census data by age, from the rate models applied to the census projections for 2017, 2030, and 2050. Data were collected from November 1, 2007, to October 31, 2008. Data analysis took place from March 31, 2016, to March 19, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence and incidence rates of low vision and blindness in the United States.
Results: Of the 6016 people in the study, 1714 (28.4%) were younger than 18 years of age, 2358 (39.1%) were 18 to 44 years of age, and 1944 (32.3%) were 45 years of age or older. There were 2888 male (48%) and 3128 female (52%) participants. The prevalence of low vision and blindness for older adults (≥45 years) in the United States in 2017 is estimated to be 3 894 406 persons (95% CI, 3 034 442-4 862 549 persons) with a BCVA less than 20/40, 1 483 703 persons (95% CI, 968 656-2 370 513 persons) with a BCVA less than 20/60, and 1 082 790 persons (95% CI, 637 771-1 741 864 persons) with a BCVA of 20/200 or less. The estimated 2017 annual incidence (projected from 2010 census data) of low vision and blindness among older adults (≥45 years) in the United States is 481 970 persons (95% CI, 375 541-601 787 persons) with a BCVA less than 20/40, 183 618 persons (95% CI, 119 878-293 367 persons) with a BCVA less than 20/60, and 134 002 persons (95% CI, 83 383-215 567 persons) with a BCVA of 20/200 or less. The total annual incidence for each BCVA criterion is 12.4% of the total prevalence. Conclusions and Relevance: Low vision and blindness affect a substantial portion of the older population in the United States. Estimates of the prevalence and annual incidence of visual impairment assist policy planners in allocating and developing resources for this life-changing loss of function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29098289      PMCID: PMC5833607          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  21 in total

1.  Sensory impairments and their associations with functional disability in a sample of the oldest-old.

Authors:  Verena R Cimarolli; Daniela S Jopp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Prevalence of nonrefractive visual impairment in US adults and associated risk factors, 1999-2002 and 2005-2008.

Authors:  Fang Ko; Susan Vitale; Chiu-Fang Chou; Mary Frances Cotch; Jinan Saaddine; David S Friedman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Age-related eye diseases and visual impairment among U.S. adults.

Authors:  Chiu-Fang Chou; Mary Frances Cotch; Susan Vitale; Xinzhi Zhang; Ronald Klein; David S Friedman; Barbara E K Klein; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof; James T Deremeik; Sonya Braudway; Mary Lou Jackson; K Bradley Kehler; Susan A Primo; Janet S Sunness
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08

5.  Performance-based and self-assessed measures of visual function as related to history of falls, hip fractures, and measured gait time. The Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  B E Klein; R Klein; K E Lee; K J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  S K West; B Munoz; G S Rubin; O D Schein; K Bandeen-Roche; S Zeger; S German; L P Fried
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

8.  Visual risk factors for falls in older people.

Authors:  S R Lord; J Dayhew
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Impairment and disability in the aged.

Authors:  A M Jette; L G Branch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

Review 10.  Identifying solutions to medication adherence in the visually impaired elderly.

Authors:  Miranda Smith; Trista Bailey
Journal:  Consult Pharm       Date:  2014-02
View more
  27 in total

1.  Adaptive Plasticity in the Retina: Protection Against Acute Injury and Neurodegenerative Disease by Conditioning Stimuli.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Gidday
Journal:  Cond Med       Date:  2018-02-15

2.  Self-reported Vision Impairment and Subjective Well-being in Older Adults: A Longitudinal Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Xiang; Vicki A Freedman; Khushali Shah; Rita X Hu; Brian C Stagg; Joshua R Ehrlich
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Screening for impaired vision in community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older in primary care settings.

Authors:  Brenda J Wilson; Susan Courage; Maria Bacchus; James A Dickinson; Scott Klarenbach; Alejandra Jaramillo Garcia; Nicki Sims-Jones; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Disparities in Low-Vision Device Use Among Older US Medicare Recipients.

Authors:  Stephanie Choi; Brian C Stagg; Joshua R Ehrlich
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 7.389

5.  Telerehabilitation for people with low vision.

Authors:  Ava K Bittner; Patrick D Yoshinaga; Stephanie L Wykstra; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

6.  Prevalence of Falls and Fall-Related Outcomes in Older Adults with Self-Reported Vision Impairment.

Authors:  Joshua R Ehrlich; Shirin E Hassan; Brian C Stagg
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Identify and Characterize Patients with Low Vision.

Authors:  Bonnielin K Swenor; Xinxing Guo; Michael V Boland; Judith E Goldstein
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  Rehabilitation Referral for Patients With Irreversible Vision Impairment Seen in a Public Safety-Net Eye Clinic.

Authors:  M Austin Coker; Carrie E Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Russell W Read; Mark W Swanson; Laura E Dreer; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lindsay Gregg; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Utilization and Abandonment of Low Vision Devices Prescribed on a Mobile Clinic.

Authors:  Micaela R Gobeille; Alexis G Malkin; Richard Jamara; Nicole C Ross
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  An implementation of Bubble Magnification did not improve the video comprehension of individuals with central vision loss.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Stephanie M Reeves; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.