Literature DB >> 29543949

Rehabilitation Referral for Patients With Irreversible Vision Impairment Seen in a Public Safety-Net Eye Clinic.

M Austin Coker1, Carrie E Huisingh1, Gerald McGwin1,2, Russell W Read1, Mark W Swanson3, Laura E Dreer1, Dawn K DeCarlo1, Lindsay Gregg1, Cynthia Owsley1.   

Abstract

Importance: The prevalence of irreversible vision impairment in the United States is expected to increase by 2050. Vision rehabilitation is the primary treatment option. Clinical trials have established its efficacy in improving quality of life. Yet studies indicate that patients experience many barriers to accessing low-vision care.
Objectives: To examine the rate of referral for low-vision rehabilitation services by resident and attending ophthalmologists for adults with irreversible vision impairment and to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of patients about vision rehabilitation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study with enrollment from June 20, 2016, to January 31, 2017, of 143 adults 18 years or older seen in a publicly funded, comprehensive eye clinic in Jefferson County, Alabama, and having 1 or both eyes with irreversible vision impairment (visual acuity was defined as 20/60 or worse) per the electronic health record. Exposures: Demographic characteristics; patient questionnaire on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about vision rehabilitation; general cognitive status (Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration test); depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9); health literacy (Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, Revised [REALM-R]); and self-reported difficulty in everyday activities. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients with irreversible vision impairment who were referred by ophthalmologists to low-vision rehabilitation services per the electronic health record.
Results: Of 143 patients enrolled with irreversible vision impairment in 1 or both eyes, the mean (SD) age was 55.4 (11.1) years and 68 (47.6%) were women. Most patients were African American (123 [86.0%]), uninsured (88 [61.5%]), and unemployed (92 [64.3%]); on average, they had normal cognitive status, minor depressive symptoms, and limited health literacy. As noted in the electronic health record, the rate of referral for low-vision rehabilitation services was 11.4% for patients with irreversible bilateral vision impairment (4 of 35 patients) and 1.9% for those with unilateral impairment (2 of 108). Most patients with bilateral (31 of 34 [91.2%]) and unilateral (90 of 97 [92.8%]) impairment indicated that they were bothered by their vision impairment, and most reported difficulty with reading (33 of 34 patients [97.1%] who were bilaterally impaired vs 85 of 104 [81.7%] who were unilaterally impaired). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest a need to better educate ophthalmologists and residents in ophthalmology about referrals to low-vision rehabilitation services for patients with irreversible vision impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29543949      PMCID: PMC5876806          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  52 in total

1.  Health-related and subjective quality of life of older adults with visual impairment.

Authors:  Judith Renaud; Melanie Levasseur; Jacques Gresset; Olga Overbury; Marie-Chantal Wanet-Defalque; Marie-France Dubois; Khatoune Témisjian; Claude Vincent; Mathieu Carignan; Johanne Desrosiers
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 2.  Vision Rehabilitation Preferred Practice Pattern®.

Authors:  Joseph L Fontenot; Mark D Bona; Mona A Kaleem; William M McLaughlin; Alan R Morse; Terry L Schwartz; John D Shepherd; Mary Lou Jackson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Binocular vision in older people with adventitious visual impairment: sometimes one eye is better than two.

Authors:  J Faubert; O Overbury
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation.

Authors:  Sheila K West; Gary S Rubin; Aimee T Broman; Beatriz Muñoz; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen Turano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06

6.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study.

Authors:  B Muñoz; S K West; G S Rubin; O D Schein; H A Quigley; S B Bressler; K Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-06

7.  Vision-specific health-related quality of life in age-related maculopathy patients presenting for low vision services.

Authors:  Kay Scilley; Dawn K DeCarlo; Jennifer Wells; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  A comparative evaluation of the short orientation memory concentration test of cognitive impairment.

Authors:  P Davous; Y Lamour; E Debrand; P Rondot
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Depression in Visual Impairment Trial (DEPVIT): A Randomized Clinical Trial of Depression Treatments in People With Low Vision.

Authors:  Claire L Nollett; Nathan Bray; Catey Bunce; Robin J Casten; Rhiannon T Edwards; Mark T Hegel; Sarah Janikoun; Sandra E Jumbe; Barbara Ryan; Julia Shearn; Daniel J Smith; Miles Stanford; Wen Xing; Tom H Margrain
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Older Alabamians System of Information and Services (OASIS): a model Title VII chapter 2 low vision rehabilitation program.

Authors:  M W Swanson; J Brock; R Houston
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1995-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Development and evaluation of novel ophthalmology domain-specific neural word embeddings to predict visual prognosis.

Authors:  Sophia Wang; Benjamin Tseng; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Developing an Ophthalmology Clinical Decision Support System to Identify Patients for Low Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Kerry Smith; Michael V Boland; Judith E Goldstein
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Using Electronic Clinical Decision Support to Examine Vision Rehabilitation Referrals and Practice Guidelines in Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Michael V Boland; Kerry Smith
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

4.  Eye Examination Recency among African American Older Adults with Chronic Medical Conditions.

Authors:  Mohsen Bazargan; Tavonia Ekwegh; Sharon Cobb; Edward Adinkrah; Shervin Assari
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.