Bonnielin K Swenor1,2, Xinxing Guo1, Michael V Boland1,3, Judith E Goldstein1. 1. a Wilmer Eye Institute , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , Maryland. 2. b Bloomberg School of Public Health , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , Maryland. 3. c Division of Health Sciences Informatics , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , Maryland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To use electronic health record (EHR) data to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of low-vision (LV) patients. METHODS: EHR data were obtained for all patients at the nine clinical locations of the Wilmer Eye Institute in 2014. LV status at each visit was defined as visual acuity (VA) worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye. Prevalence and incidence estimates were determined over a 12-month period. Demographic and clinical data were used to compare the characteristics of patients with and without LV. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine prevalence and incidence estimates adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 100,755 patients were included in the analysis. There were 7752 (7.7%) prevalent and 1962 (2.1%) incident cases of LV. Among patients with LV, 55% had VA between 20/40 and 20/60. Outside of LV clinics, retina and glaucoma clinics had the highest prevalence (18% and 14%, respectively) and incidence (5% and 4%, respectively) of LV. The urban hospital center had twice the prevalence of LV than suburban clinics (11.5% vs. 5.6%). The odds of prevalent LV was greatest among patients 80 years and older (odds ratio = 6.18; 95% confidence interval: 5.62-6.80) as compared to those 20-39 years old. CONCLUSIONS: EHR can be used to estimate the prevalence and describe the characteristics of patients with LV seeking ophthalmic care. The highest prevalence rates of LV are observed in the urban setting and among patients obtaining retina and glaucoma care.
PURPOSE: To use electronic health record (EHR) data to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of low-vision (LV) patients. METHODS: EHR data were obtained for all patients at the nine clinical locations of the Wilmer Eye Institute in 2014. LV status at each visit was defined as visual acuity (VA) worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye. Prevalence and incidence estimates were determined over a 12-month period. Demographic and clinical data were used to compare the characteristics of patients with and without LV. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine prevalence and incidence estimates adjusted for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS: A total of 100,755 patients were included in the analysis. There were 7752 (7.7%) prevalent and 1962 (2.1%) incident cases of LV. Among patients with LV, 55% had VA between 20/40 and 20/60. Outside of LV clinics, retina and glaucoma clinics had the highest prevalence (18% and 14%, respectively) and incidence (5% and 4%, respectively) of LV. The urban hospital center had twice the prevalence of LV than suburban clinics (11.5% vs. 5.6%). The odds of prevalent LV was greatest among patients 80 years and older (odds ratio = 6.18; 95% confidence interval: 5.62-6.80) as compared to those 20-39 years old. CONCLUSIONS: EHR can be used to estimate the prevalence and describe the characteristics of patients with LV seeking ophthalmic care. The highest prevalence rates of LV are observed in the urban setting and among patients obtaining retina and glaucoma care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electronic Health Records; Low Vision; Prevalence
Authors: Judith E Goldstein; Mary Lou Jackson; Sandra M Fox; James T Deremeik; Robert W Massof Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Nathan Congdon; Benita O'Colmain; Caroline C W Klaver; Ronald Klein; Beatriz Muñoz; David S Friedman; John Kempen; Hugh R Taylor; Paul Mitchell Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Judith E Goldstein; Xinxing Guo; Bonnielin K Swenor; Michael V Boland; Kerry Smith Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-10-03 Impact factor: 3.048