Literature DB >> 29098286

Development of an 18-Item Measure of Symptom Burden in Patients With Glaucoma From the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study's Symptom and Health Problem Checklist.

David C Musch1,2, Michelle E Tarver3, Matt J Goren4, Nancy K Janz5.   

Abstract

Importance: Administration of a brief questionnaire to evaluate glaucoma symptoms would lend useful information for patient care.
Objectives: To develop a shortened glaucoma symptom measure based on the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) Symptom and Health Problem Checklist (SHPC) and evaluate its psychometric properties. Design, Setting, and Participants: This measure development study evaluated the factor structure of the 43-item SHPC that was obtained from CIGTS participants at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. These 607 participants were enrolled at 14 clinical centers in the United States and had newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma. Their mean deviation (SD) from visual field testing was −5.5 (4.3) dB. Data were collected from October 1993 through April 1997. Main Outcomes and Measures: The factor structure of the SHPC, confirmatory factor analysis of the resulting 18-item questionnaire (SHPC-18), the reliability of the SHPC-18, and associations of the 2 symptom subscales (Local Eye and Visual Function) of the SHPC-18 with visual field severity and 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ25) subscales.
Results: Among the 607 participants (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 57.5 [10.9] years), 334 (55.0%) were men and 273 (45.0%) were women; 231 (38.1%) were African American. Exploratory factor analysis and longitudinal growth modeling documented Local Eye and Visual Function symptom subscales. Cronbach α values for mean weighted internal consistency were 0.83 and 0.89 for the Local Eye and Visual Function subscales, respectively, and remained stable over time. Scores on each subscale significantly correlated with the NEI-VFQ25 total score (r = −0.41 and r = −0.59, respectively) and with all subscale scores (P < .01). Participants with more severe glaucoma had higher (worse) mean (SD) scores than those with mild glaucoma at baseline on the Local Eye (4.68 [6.62] vs 3.07 [5.60]) and Visual Function (8.44 [11.45] vs 4.42 [8.94]; P < .05) SHPC-18 subscales. Participants who underwent trabeculectomy reported a higher frequency of any Local Eye symptoms than those treated with topical medications (eg, at 12 months, 153 of 269 [56.9%] vs 11 of 276 [40.9%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that the SHPC-18 is a reliable, responsive, and psychometrically sound measure of patient-reported, glaucoma-related symptoms. The measure is responsive to treatment and discriminates the severity of glaucoma. This shorter version of the original SHPC measure may be useful in clinical and research settings to better understand the influence of glaucoma symptoms on patients’ daily life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29098286      PMCID: PMC6331048          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.4574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  23 in total

1.  Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Roger C W Wolfs; Benita J O'Colmain; Barbara E Klein; Hugh R Taylor; Shelia West; M Cristina Leske; Paul Mitchell; Nathan Congdon; John Kempen
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

2.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

Authors:  C M Mangione; P P Lee; P R Gutierrez; K Spritzer; S Berry; R D Hays
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07

3.  The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: interim quality of life findings after initial medical or surgical treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  N K Janz; P A Wren; P R Lichter; D C Musch; B W Gillespie; K E Guire; R P Mills
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function.

Authors:  Patricia Nelson; Peter Aspinall; Orestis Papasouliotis; Bruce Worton; Colm O'Brien
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Psychometric evaluation of the Glaucoma Symptom Identifier.

Authors:  John G Walt; Regina Rendas-Baum; Mark Kosinski; Vaishali Patel
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement.

Authors:  A C Viswanathan; A I McNaught; D Poinoosawmy; L Fontana; D P Crabb; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-04

7.  The VF-14. An index of functional impairment in patients with cataract.

Authors:  E P Steinberg; J M Tielsch; O D Schein; J C Javitt; P Sharkey; S D Cassard; M W Legro; M Diener-West; E B Bass; A M Damiano
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-05

8.  The Glaucoma Symptom Scale. A brief index of glaucoma-specific symptoms.

Authors:  B L Lee; P Gutierrez; M Gordon; M R Wilson; G A Cioffi; R Ritch; M Sherwood; C M Mangione
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07

9.  Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Joanne Wu; Ron D Hays; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors.

Authors:  David C Musch; Brenda W Gillespie; Paul R Lichter; Leslie M Niziol; Nancy K Janz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.