OBJECTIVE: To present interim quality of life (QOL) findings in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) using all available follow-up through 5 years from treatment initiation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred seven newly diagnosed patients with open-angle glaucoma from 14 clinical centers. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to either initial medical therapy or initial trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, patients received clinical and QOL evaluations at 6-month intervals. QOL assessments were administered by telephone at a centralized interviewing center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The CIGTS collected comprehensive QOL information that included both generic and vision-specific QOL measures. This article focuses on initial treatment group differences related to symptom reporting, as measured by a Symptom and Health Problem Checklist, and changes in daily visual functioning, as measured by the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). RESULTS: Across both treatment groups, there was an overall decline in the percent of participants reporting symptoms over time. Of 43 possible symptoms, 12 symptoms were reported with greater frequency by the surgically treated group and 7 symptoms more frequently by the medically-treated group. The surgical patients reported more total Symptom Impact Glaucoma (P = 0.005) and, in particular, more bother related to local eye symptoms. Very few treatment group differences were noted in visual functioning, although surgical patients reported more problems with activities related to their visual acuity (P = 0.024). The percentage of patients across treatment groups reporting worry about blindness was 50% at baseline but declined to approximately 25% over time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the QOL impact reported by the two treatment groups as measured by instruments used in this study is remarkably similar, with relatively few significant study group differences observed after up to 5 years of follow-up in the CIGTS. When significant differences in visual function have been detected using the VAQ, they are consistent with the clinical outcomes. To date, the most persistent QOL finding is the increased impact of local eye symptoms reported by the surgical group compared with the medical group. Although no changes are recommended in the treatment of newly diagnosed glaucoma patients at the time of this interim report, further follow-up will allow for more definitive answers to the QOL impact of these two treatment approaches.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To present interim quality of life (QOL) findings in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) using all available follow-up through 5 years from treatment initiation. DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred seven newly diagnosed patients with open-angle glaucoma from 14 clinical centers. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to either initial medical therapy or initial trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, patients received clinical and QOL evaluations at 6-month intervals. QOL assessments were administered by telephone at a centralized interviewing center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The CIGTS collected comprehensive QOL information that included both generic and vision-specific QOL measures. This article focuses on initial treatment group differences related to symptom reporting, as measured by a Symptom and Health Problem Checklist, and changes in daily visual functioning, as measured by the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). RESULTS: Across both treatment groups, there was an overall decline in the percent of participants reporting symptoms over time. Of 43 possible symptoms, 12 symptoms were reported with greater frequency by the surgically treated group and 7 symptoms more frequently by the medically-treated group. The surgical patients reported more total Symptom Impact Glaucoma (P = 0.005) and, in particular, more bother related to local eye symptoms. Very few treatment group differences were noted in visual functioning, although surgical patients reported more problems with activities related to their visual acuity (P = 0.024). The percentage of patients across treatment groups reporting worry about blindness was 50% at baseline but declined to approximately 25% over time. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the QOL impact reported by the two treatment groups as measured by instruments used in this study is remarkably similar, with relatively few significant study group differences observed after up to 5 years of follow-up in the CIGTS. When significant differences in visual function have been detected using the VAQ, they are consistent with the clinical outcomes. To date, the most persistent QOL finding is the increased impact of local eye symptoms reported by the surgical group compared with the medical group. Although no changes are recommended in the treatment of newly diagnosed glaucomapatients at the time of this interim report, further follow-up will allow for more definitive answers to the QOL impact of these two treatment approaches.
Authors: Sachin R Joshi; Pramod B Akat; Jaiprakash B Ramanand; Sunita J Ramanand; Vitthal B Karande; Suyog S Jain Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 1.848
Authors: Benjamin J Frankfort; A Kareem Khan; Dennis Y Tse; Inyoung Chung; Ji-Jie Pang; Zhuo Yang; Ronald L Gross; Samuel M Wu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marcela C Cypel; Niro Kasahara; Denise Atique; Cristiano C Umbelino; Mônica P A Alcântara; Francisco S Seixas; Geraldo V de Almeida; Carmo Mandia; Ralph Cohen Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2006-03-07 Impact factor: 2.031