Literature DB >> 12671469

Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function.

Patricia Nelson1, Peter Aspinall, Orestis Papasouliotis, Bruce Worton, Colm O'Brien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (a) to explore patients self-reported visual disability resulting from glaucoma by means of a questionnaire developed for this purpose; (b) identify activities strongly associated with a measure of visual field loss, (c) to quantify different psychophysical aspects of visual function; (d) to assess the relationship between objective measures of visual function and patients' perception of their vision-related quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three groups of glaucoma patients (n = 47) with mild (n = 18), moderate (n = 19), and severe visual field loss (n = 10) and a group of normal controls (n = 19) underwent a comprehensive clinical examination, completed a questionnaire and, on a separate visit, performed a number of psychophysical tests of visual function. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaire responses (vision-related quality of life, general health and psychosocial variables), visual acuity, visual fields, Esterman binocular disability scores, contrast sensitivity, critical flicker frequency, color vision, dark adaptation, glare disability (brightness acuity), and stereoacuity scores were measured.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 50 questions were noted to have a strong significant relationship with a measure of visual field loss and were included in a new questionnaire scale, the Glaucoma Quality of Life - 15 (GQL-15). The scale validity showed a significant correlation with perimetric mean deviation (MD) values (r = -0.6; P < 0.0001), the reliability of the scale was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.95), and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was strong (r = 0.87). An overall statistically significant decrease in performance-related quality of life was noted between normal subjects and all groups of glaucoma patients. A significant relationship was found between the scale questionnaire summary performance measure and a number of psychophysical tests: Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity (r = -0.45, P < 0.001), glare disability (r = -0.41, P < 0.001), Esterman binocular visual field test (r = -0.39, P < 0.001), dark adaptation (r = 0.34, P = 0.007), and stereopsis (r = 0.26, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Perceived visual disability relating to certain tasks (particularly involving dark adaptation and disability glare, activities demanding functional peripheral vision such us tripping over and bumping into objects and outdoor mobility tasks) was significantly associated with the severity of binocular visual field loss. As a result, a new glaucoma-specific questionnaire scale with good performance characteristics is presented in this study. The difficulties encountered by patients in everyday life (as measured with the questionnaire) were also mirrored in their performance on a number of psychophysical tests, especially contrast sensitivity, glare disability, Esterman binocular visual field test, and dark adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12671469     DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200304000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  113 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation of visual tasks with which to assess distance-specific visual function.

Authors:  Mark J Atkinson; Steven Tally; Chris W Heichel; Igor Kozak; Jennifer Leich; Ashley Levack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcomes (PRO's) in glaucoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Vandenbroeck; S De Geest; T Zeyen; I Stalmans; F Dobbels
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Use of an augmented-vision device for visual search by patients with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Visual functioning and quality of life among the older people in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Jason C S Leung; Timothy C Y Kwok; Dicken C C Chan; Kay W K Yuen; Anthony W L Kwok; Dicky T K Choy; Edith M C Lau; P C Leung
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.485

5.  Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Gabriele H Franke; Bernhard A Sabel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Impact of visual field loss on health-related quality of life in glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Ying Wang; Joanne Wu; Stanley P Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields.

Authors:  Ryo Asaoka; Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; David F Garway-Heath; David P Crabb
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  A view on glaucoma--are we seeing it clearly?

Authors:  D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Exploring eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing a driving scene.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Franziska G Rauscher; Catharine M Chisholm; John L Barbur; David F Edgar; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The quality of life impact of peripheral versus central vision loss with a focus on glaucoma versus age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Keith Evans; Simon K Law; John Walt; Patricia Buchholz; Jan Hansen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.