| Literature DB >> 29096787 |
Michael R Bristow1, David P Kao2, Khadijah K Breathett3, Natasha L Altman2, John Gorcsan4, Edward A Gill2, Brian D Lowes5, Edward M Gilbert6, Robert A Quaife2, Douglas L Mann4.
Abstract
Diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and development of new therapies for diseases or syndromes depend on a reliable means of identifying phenotypes associated with distinct predictive probabilities for these various objectives. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) provides the current basis for combined functional and structural phenotyping in heart failure by classifying patients as those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently the utility of LVEF as the major phenotypic determinant of heart failure has been challenged based on its load dependency and measurement variability. We review the history of the development and adoption of LVEF as a critical measurement of LV function and structure and demonstrate that, in chronic heart failure, load dependency is not an important practical issue, and we provide hemodynamic and molecular biomarker evidence that LVEF is superior or equal to more unwieldy methods of identifying phenotypes of ventricular remodeling. We conclude that, because it reliably measures both left ventricular function and structure, LVEF remains the best current method of assessing pathologic remodeling in heart failure in both individual clinical and multicenter group settings. Because of the present and future importance of left ventricular phenotyping in heart failure, LVEF should be measured by using the most accurate technology and methodologic refinements available, and improved characterization methods should continue to be sought.Entities:
Keywords: ejection fraction; gene expression; heart failure; left ventricular function; left ventricular structure; phenotyping
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29096787 PMCID: PMC7340335 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.09.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Heart Fail ISSN: 2213-1779 Impact factor: 12.035