Literature DB >> 31624026

Prognostic Significance of Echocardiographic Measures of Cardiac Remodeling.

Beatrice von Jeinsen1, Meghan I Short2, Martin G Larson3, Vanessa Xanthakis4, David D McManus5, Emelia J Benjamin6, Gary F Mitchell7, Jayashri Aragam8, Susan Cheng9, Ramachandran S Vasan10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, novel echocardiographic measures have constantly emerged. It is still unclear which echocardiographic measures have the most significant prognostic value in the general population. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of a large panel of echocardiographic measures to identify the most promising measures.
METHODS: A total of 1,497 Framingham study participants (mean age, 65 years; 55.4% women) who underwent echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, mitral annular plane systolic excursion, mitral E/e' ratio, maximum and minimum left atrial (LA) volume index, LA emptying fraction, and left ventricular longitudinal synchrony were evaluated. These measures were related to the incidence of two composite outcomes: cardiovascular disease (CVD) or death and atrial fibrillation (AF) or congestive heart failure (CHF).
RESULTS: On follow-up (mean, 8.3 years), there were 241 CVD events or deaths and 139 AF or CHF events. In multivariate-adjusted Cox models, higher LA emptying fraction was associated with a lower risk (hazard ratios per SD, 0.80 and 0.70 for CVD or death and AF or CHF, respectively; P ≤ .001 for both) while higher minimum LA volume index (hazard ratios per SD, 1.32 and 1.70 for CVD or death and AF or CHF, respectively; P ≤ .001 for both) and maximum LA volume index (hazard ratios per SD, 1.26 and 1.54 for CVD or death and AF or CHF, respectively; P ≤ .002 for both) were associated with a higher risk for both composite outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based sample, LA volumes and function were the best echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcomes. Therefore, these values should be considered for inclusion in standard echocardiographic assessments for the purpose of risk stratification.
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echocardiography; Epidemiology; Mortality; Outcome; Risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31624026      PMCID: PMC6986561          DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  56 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Long-term prognostic impact of left atrial volumes and emptying fraction in a community-based cohort.

Authors:  Pär Hedberg; Jonas Selmeryd; Jerzy Leppert; Egil Henriksen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teerapat Yingchoncharoen; Shikhar Agarwal; Zoran B Popović; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 4.  Structural and Functional Phenotyping of the Failing Heart: Is the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Obsolete?

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; David P Kao; Khadijah K Breathett; Natasha L Altman; John Gorcsan; Edward A Gill; Brian D Lowes; Edward M Gilbert; Robert A Quaife; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 12.035

5.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; R J Garrison; D D Savage; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Left Atrial Structure and Function, and Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Liza Thomas; Thomas H Marwick; Bogdan A Popescu; Erwan Donal; Luigi P Badano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Xiaoyan Yin; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Alexa S Beiser; David D McManus; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven A Lubitz; Jared W Magnani; Patrick T Ellinor; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Relations of Central Hemodynamics and Aortic Stiffness with Left Ventricular Structure and Function: The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Bernhard M Kaess; Jian Rong; Martin G Larson; Naomi M Hamburg; Joseph A Vita; Susan Cheng; Jayashree Aragam; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Distinct Aspects of Left Ventricular Mechanical Function Are Differentially Associated With Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in the Community.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Elizabeth L McCabe; Martin G Larson; Allison A Merz; Ewa Osypiuk; Birgitta T Lehman; Plamen Stantchev; Jayashri Aragam; Scott D Solomon; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Left atrial minimum volume is more strongly associated with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide than the left atrial maximum volume in a community-based sample.

Authors:  Pär Hedberg; Jonas Selmeryd; Jerzy Leppert; Egil Henriksen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of Blood Pressure in the Early 40s on Left Atrial Volumes in the Mid-60s: Data From the ACE 1950 Study.

Authors:  Peter Selmer Rønningen; Trygve Berge; Magnar Gangås Solberg; Steve Enger; Mohammad Osman Pervez; Eivind Bjørkan Orstad; Brede Kvisvik; Erika Nerdrum Aagaard; Magnus Nakrem Lyngbakken; Inger Ariansen; Helge Røsjø; Kjetil Steine; Arnljot Tveit
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  Effects of danicamtiv, a novel cardiac myosin activator, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: experimental data and clinical results from a phase 2a trial.

Authors:  Adriaan A Voors; Jean-François Tamby; John G Cleland; Michael Koren; Leslie B Forgosh; Dinesh Gupta; Lars H Lund; Albert Camacho; Ravi Karra; Henk P Swart; Pierpaolo Pellicori; Frank Wagner; Ray E Hershberger; Narayana Prasad; Robert Anderson; Anu Anto; Kaylyn Bell; Jay M Edelberg; Liang Fang; Marcus Henze; Cynthia Kelly; Gregory Kurio; Wanying Li; Kate Wells; Chun Yang; Sam L Teichman; Carlos L Del Rio; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 15.534

3.  Association of lung diffusion capacity with cardiac remodeling and risk of heart failure: The Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Ibrahim Musa Yola; Albin Oh; Gary F Mitchell; George O'Connor; Susan Cheng; Ramachandran S Vasan; Vanessa Xanthakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Role of confirmed and potential predictors of an unfavorable outcome in heart failure in everyday clinical practice.

Authors:  Anna Chuda; Maciej Banach; Marek Maciejewski; Agata Bielecka-Dabrowa
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.