| Literature DB >> 29096620 |
Shi Wen1, Bohan Zhan2, Jianghua Feng3, Weize Hu1, Xianchao Lin1, Jianxi Bai1, Heguang Huang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) could be associated with prognosis and may influence the choices of clinical management. No applicable methods could reliably predict the tumor differentiation preoperatively. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the metabonomic profiling of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with different differentiations and assess the feasibility of predicting tumor differentiations through metabonomic strategy based on nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Entities:
Keywords: Metabonomics; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Tumor differentiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29096620 PMCID: PMC5668965 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3703-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Representative 500 MHz 1H CPMG NMR spectra of serum samples from pancreatic cancer mice induced by the different differentiated cells. The spectral regions of δ5.5-9.0 (in the dashed box) were magnified 20 times compared with the regions of δ0.0-5.5 for the purpose of clarity. The abbreviations for peak assignments were noted in Table 1
The metabolites assignments from NMR spectra of serum from PDAC micea
| Abbreviation | Metabolites | 1H chemical shift(multiplicity)b |
|---|---|---|
| 1-MH | 1-Methylhistidine | 7.06(s), 7.78(s) |
| 3-HB | 3-Hydroxybutyrate | 1.20(d), 2.31(dd), 2.40(m), 4.16(m) |
| Ace | Acetate | 1.92(s) |
| AA | Acetoacetate | 2.28(s) |
| Act | Acetone | 2.24(s) |
| Ala | Alanine | 1.48(d) |
| All | Allantoin | 5.39(s) |
| Bet | Betaine | 3.27(s), 3.90(s) |
| Cho | Choline | 3.20(s) |
| Cit | Citrate | 2.53(d), 2.67(d) |
| Cr | Creatine | 3.04(s), 3.93(s) |
| Eth | Ethanol | 1.18(t), 3.61(q) |
| For | Formate | 8.46(s) |
| Fum | Fumarate | 6.52(s) |
| Glu | Glutamate | 2.08(m), 2.11(m), 2.35(m), 3.75(t) |
| Gln | Glutamine | 2.14(m), 2.45(m), 3.75(t) |
| G | Glycerol | 3.55(m), 3.66(dd), 3.78(m) |
| GPC | Glycerolphosphocholine | 3.23(s), 4.33(m) |
| Gly | Glycine | 3.56(s) |
| His | Histidine | 7.08(s), 7.82(s) |
| HOD | Residual water signal | 4.76(br) |
| IB | Isobutyrate | 1.07(d) |
| Ile | Isoleucine | 0.94(t), 1.01(d) |
| L1 | LDL | 0.86(br), 1.28(br) |
| L2 | VLDL | 0.89(br), 1.30(br), 1.58(br) |
| L3 | Unsaturated fatty acid | 2.04(br), 2.24(br), 2.76(br), 5.31(br) |
| Lac | Lactate | 1.33(d), 4.11(q) |
| Leu | Leucine | 0.96(d) |
| Lys | Lysine | 1.46(m), 1.73(m), 1.91(m), 3.03(m), 3.76(t) |
| Mal | Malonate | 3.11(s) |
| Met | Methionine | 2.14(s), 2.63(t) |
| MG | Methylguanidine | 2.83(s), 3.36(s) |
| Mol | Methanol | 3.36(s) |
| m-I |
| 3.52(dd), 3.61(dd), 4.07(m) |
| NAG | N-acetyl glycoprotein | 2.03(s) |
| Phe | Phenylalanine | 7.32(d), 7.37(t), 7.42(dd) |
| PC | Phosphocholine | 3.21(s) |
| Py | Pyruvate | 2.37(s) |
| Suc | Succinate | 2.40(s) |
| Thr | Threonine | 1.33(d), 4.26(m) |
| TMA | Trimethylamine | 2.89(s) |
| Trp | Tryptophan | 7.27(m), 7.30(s), 7.54(d), 7.73(d) |
| Tyr | Tyrosine | 6.90(d), 7.19(d) |
| Urea | Urea | 5.80(br) |
| Val | Valine | 0.99(d), 1.04(d) |
| α-Glc | α-Glucose | 3.42(t), 3.54(dd), 3.71(t), 3.73(m), 3.84(m), 5.24(d) |
| β-Glc | β-Glucose | 3.24(ddb), 3.41(t), 3.46(m), 3.49(t), 3.90(dd), 4.65(d) |
a PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
bmultiplicity:s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, doublets; m, multiplet; br, broad resonance
Fig. 2The PCA (a) and PLS-DA (b) scores plots based on 1H NMR data of serums from PDAC groups. P, Panc-1; B, BxPC-3; SW, SW1990
Fig. 3OPLS-DA scores plots (upper left panels) and plots of permutation tests (n = 200) (upper right panels) derived from 1H NMR spectra of serum samples and corresponding coefficient loading plots (bottom panels) from the pair-wise comparisons between Panc-1, Bxpc-3 and SW1990 groups. a. Panc-1 vs SW1990, b. BxPC-3 vs SW1990, c. Panc-1 vs BxPC-3. The color map shows the significance of metabolites variations between the two classes. Keys of the assignments were shown in Table 1. P, Panc-1; B, BxPC-3; SW, SW1990
OPLS-DA coefficients of metabolites in different pair-comparisons derived from NMR-data
| Metabolites | ra | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BxPC-3 vs SW1990 | Panc-1 vs SW1990 | Panc-1 vs BxPC-3 | |
| Glycolysis and glutaminolysis | |||
| α-Glucose | −0.788 | −0.631 | – |
| β-Glucose | −0.735 | −0.842 | – |
| Citrate | 0.817 | 0.921 | – |
| Glutamate | 0.808 | 0.747 | −0.789 |
| Glutamine | 0.767 | 0.856 | – |
| Lactate | 0.906 | 0.905 | – |
| pyruvate | −0.880 | – | 0.793 |
| Succinate | – | – | – |
|
| |||
| Acetate | – | – | – |
| Formate | – | – | – |
| Fumarate | – | – | – |
| Isobutyrate | – | – | −0.709 |
| Malonate | – | – | −0.648 |
|
| |||
| Ethanol | 0.879 | – | −0.804 |
| Methanol | 0.702 | 0.760 | 0.667 |
| myo-Inositol | 0.889 | 0.817 | −0.877 |
| Glycerol | 0.935 | 0.784 | −0.916 |
| Lipid | |||
| LDL | −0.899 | −0.847 | 0.912 |
| VLDL | −0.774 | 0.720 | 0.921 |
| Unsaturated fatty acid | −0.899 | −0.847 | 0.912 |
|
| |||
| 3-Hydroxybutyrate | 0.747 | – | −0.636 |
| Acetoacetate | – | – | – |
| Acetone | −0.760 | – | 0.912 |
|
| |||
| Choline | – | −0.836 | −0.841 |
| Glycerolphosphocholine | 0.671 | −0.912 | −0.894 |
| Phosphocholine | 0.736 | −0.832 | −0.892 |
| Amino acid | |||
|
| |||
| 1-methylhistidine | – | – | −0.651 |
| Alanine | 0.750 | 0.778 | – |
| Betaine | 0.812 | 0.834 | −0.769 |
| Creatine | 0.930 | 0.826 | −0.849 |
| Glycine | 0.871 | 0.674 | – |
| Histidine | 0.776 | 0.602 | – |
| Tyrosine | 0.832 | 0.859 | – |
|
| |||
| Isoleucine | 0.749 | 0.795 | – |
| Leucine | 0.707 | 0.775 | – |
| Lysine | 0.886 | 0.822 | −0.780 |
| Methionine | – | 0.645 | – |
| Phenylalanine | 0.878 | 0.813 | −0.642 |
| Threonine | 0.630 | 0.794 | 0.730 |
| Tryptophan | 0.846 | 0.847 | −0.673 |
| Valine | 0.839 | 0.858 | – |
| Others | |||
| Methylguanidine | 0.650 | 0.732 | – |
| Allantoin | −0.687 | – | – |
| N-acetyl glycoprotein | – | 0.661 | 0.914 |
| Trimethylamine | −0.855 | 0.750 | 0.782 |
aCorrelation coefficients, positive and negative signs indicate positive and negative correlation in the concentrations. |r| > 0.576 was the cutoff value for significance based on discrimination significance of p = 0.05 and df = 10. “-” means |r| < 0.576
Fig. 4The corresponding pathways drived from the differential metabolites from different pair-comparisons. a BxPC-3 vs SW1990, b Panc-1 vs SW1990, c Panc-1 vs BxPC-3. This pathway analysis was performed in MBROLE online services based on KEGG database. The pathways with P-value <0.01(y-axes) and corresponding P-values (x-axes) in different pair-comparison were identified and listed