| Literature DB >> 32146866 |
Qian-Hui Xu1, Qing Yuan1, Yu-Qing Zhang1, Biao Li2, You-Lan Min2, Qian-Min Ge2, Rong-Bin Liang2, Yi Shao1.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a common type of tumor among elderly male population; it causes intraocular metastasis (IOM). The study investigated the differences between elderly male bladder cancer patients with and without IOM, and identified risk factors for IOM. In this study, 749 elderly male patients (aged ≥50 years) with bladder cancer were included from November 2003 to December 2016. Differences between the IOM and non-IOM (NIOM) groups were evaluated by chi-square test and Student's t-test. The binary logistic regression analysis calculates the risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic value of IOM in elderly male patients with bladder cancer. The incidence of IOM in patients with bladder cancer was 1.7%. No significant differences were detected in age and histopathology between the IOM and NIOM groups. According to the study, the IOM group had higher ALP and Cyfra21-1. Binary logistic regression indicated that ALP and Cyfra21-1 were risk factors for IOM in elderly male bladder cancer patients (p < .05). ROC curve analysis revealed area under the curve values for ALP and Cyfra21-1 of 0.913 and 0.814, using cutoff values of 9.65 and 83.5 U/L, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values for ALP were 61.5% and 95.8%, respectively, while those for Cyfra21-1 were 84.6% and 73.3%. The investigation indicates that ALP and Cyfra21-1 are risk factors for IOM in elderly male patients with bladder cancer and ALP is more reliable at distinguishing IOM from NIOM in elderly male patients with bladder cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly male; alkaline phosphatase; bladder cancer; hemoglobin; ocular metastasis; risk factors
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32146866 PMCID: PMC7065287 DOI: 10.1177/1557988320908998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Bladder Cancer.
| Items | IOM | NIOM | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 67.15 ± 11.45 | 65.02 ± 11.33 | 65.05 ± 11.33 | |
|
| ||||
|
| 4 (30.8) | 311 (42.3) | 315 (42.1) | .0069 |
|
| 2 (15.4) | 102 (13.9) | 104 (13.9) | |
|
| 4 (30.38) | 176 (23.9) | 180 (24.0) | |
|
| 3 (23.1) | 147 (19.9) | 149 (19.9) | |
Note. IOM = intraocular metastases; NIOM = nonintraocular metastases.
Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used. p < .05 represented statistical significance.
Figure 1.Clinical characteristics of bladder cancer patients with (A) IOM and (B) NIOM.
Note. IOM = intraocular metastases; NIOM = nonintraocular metastases.
Differences in the Clinical Lipid-Relevant Parameters Between Patients With and Without IOM (Mann–Whitney test) and Results of the Binary Logistic Regression Analysis.
| Factors | IOM group | NIOM group |
| OR | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALP (U/L)* | 314.38 ± 390.45 | 81.96 ± 78.16 | 0.0001 | 1.005 | [1.001, 1.010] | .019 |
| Cyfra21-1 (ng/ml)* | 50.84 ± 132.41 | 4.75 ± 2.37 | 0. 378 | 1.460 | [1.237, 1.723] | <.001 |
| Serum calcium | 2.37 ± 0.23 | 2.24 ± 0.24 | 2.160 | 8.673 | [0.423, 177.623] | .161 |
| CA-724 (U/ml) | 42.02 ± 91.55 | 35.60 ± 32.93 | 0.007 | 1.007 | [0.997, 1.017] | .152 |
| NSE (μg/L) | 48.65 ± 36.52 | 40.89 ± 18.50 | −0.003 | 0.997 | [0.985, 1.038] | .890 |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 3.45 ± 1.86 | 2.85 ± 1.17 | 0.086 | 1.090 | [0.661, 1.799] | .735 |
| CEA (ng/ml) | 18.45 ± 39.78 | 15.83 ± 16.23 | −0.055 | 0.947 | [0.896, 1.000] | .051 |
| CA-125 (U/ml) | 363.54 ± 407.77 | 205.85 ± 239.71 | 0.000 | 1.000 | [0.999, 1.002] | .476 |
| CA-153 (U/ml) | 83.24 ± 85.26 | 151.69 ± 88.68 | −0.007 | 0.993 | [0.982, 1.004] | .205 |
| CA-199 (U/ml) | 126.36 ± 271.81 | 106.83 ± 135.10 | −0.006 | 0.994 | [0.983, 1.005] | .279 |
| Hb (g/L) | 101.15 ± 20.92 | 117.02 ± 24.79 | −0.023 | 0.997 | [0.945, 1.010] | .177 |
Note. ALP = alkaline phosphatase; IOM = intraocular metastases; NIOM = nonintraocular metastases; Hb = hemoglobin; B = coefficient of regression; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; IOM = intraocular metastases.
Independent samples t test was applied. Binary logistic analysis was applied. p < .05 represented statistical significance.
Figure 2.The ROC of ALP and Cyfra21-1 in bladder cancer patients with IOM and NIOM.
Note. (A) ROC curve of Cyfra21-1. AUC was 0.814 (p < .001; 95% CI [1.237, 1.723]) (IOM > NIOMs); (B) ROC curve of ALP. AUC was 0.913 (p = .019; 95% CI [1.001, 1.010]) (IOM > NIOM). ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = areas under the curve; CI = confidence interval; IOM = intraocular metastases; NIOM = nonintraocular metastases.
Cutoff value, Sensitivity, Specificity, and AUC for Each Risk Factor in Predicting IOM in Patients With Bladder Cancer.
| Factors | Cutoff value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALP | 9.65 | 61.5 | 95.8 | 0.913 | .019 |
| Cyfra21-1 | 83.5 | 84.6 | 73.3 | 0.814 | <.001 |
Note. ALP = alkaline phosphatase; AUC = area under the curve; IOM = intraocular metastases; ROC = receiver operating characteristics.
Risk Factors for Metastasis of Bladder Cancer.
| Author (year) | Metastatic sites | Risk factor |
|---|---|---|
|
| lymph node | SNAl1 |
|
| lymph node | CyclinD1 |
|
| lymph node | NLR |
|
| bone | ALP, Hb, Calcium |
|
| lymph node | Arp2 |
Note. IOM = intraocular metastases.