Literature DB >> 20101172

Invasion of the splenic artery is a crucial prognostic factor in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas.

Mitsuro Kanda1, Tsutomu Fujii, Tevfik T Sahin, Akiyuki Kanzaki, Shunji Nagai, Suguru Yamada, Hiroyuki Sugimoto, Shuji Nomoto, Shin Takeda, Yasuhiro Kodera, Satoshi Morita, Akimasa Nakao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective study was performed to determine the prognostic implications of invasion to the splenic vessels in pancreatic body and tail cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the splenic artery (SA) and vein (SV) is frequently observed in carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas, but its correlation with various other clinicopathologic factors and prognosis has not been explored in detail.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients who had undergone distal pancreatectomy for invasive adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas were discreetly selected from the prospective data base for analyses. Cases that required extended surgery due to invasion of the major vessels such as the portal vein, common hepatic artery, celiac artery, and superior mesenteric artery were excluded. Correlation between invasion of the splenic vessels and prognosis and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients with invasion of the SA had a significantly inferior prognosis compared with those without the invasion (P = 0.0067), whereas invasion of the SV, observed in 24 patients, did not affect prognosis. Additionally, invasion of the SA significantly correlated with tumor size > or = 2 cm, anterior serosal infiltration, perineural invasion and SV invasion (P = 0.0440, P = 0.0406, P = 0.0460, and P = 0.0173, respectively). In univariate analysis, SA invasion, lymph node metastasis, and anterior serosal infiltration were identified as significant poor prognostic factors. In multivariable analysis, only SA invasion was an independent prognostic factor (odds ratio, 2.611, P = 0.0196).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that the invasion of the SA, but not that of the SV, is a crucial prognostic factor in pancreatic body and tail cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101172     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf9171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  Vascular resections in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-10

2.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The Prognostic Impact of the Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Resected Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onoe; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Yasuyuki Fukami; Takamasa Takahashi; Masahito Uji; Yuji Kaneoka
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Preoperative radiographic vascular involvement score predicts the prognosis of resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shunsuke Onoe; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yuichi Takayama; Yasuyuki Fukami
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Combination of the serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen is a simple and accurate predictor of mortality in pancreatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Tsutomu Fujii; Hideki Takami; Masaya Suenaga; Yoshikuni Inokawa; Suguru Yamada; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Shuji Nomoto; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Sung Hwan Lee; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case-control study.

Authors:  Sanket Sharad Mehta; Ghalia Doumane; Thibault Mura; David Nocca; Jean-Michel Fabre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Surgical resection strategies for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Gluth; Jens Werner; Werner Hartwig
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  A replaced right hepatic artery adjacent to pancreatic carcinoma should be divided to obtain R0 resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Okada; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Motoki Miyazawa; Atsushi Shimizu; Yuji Kitahata; Masaji Tani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Standard Retrograde Pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiya Abe; Kenoki Ohuchida; Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Takao Ohtsuka; Yoshinao Oda; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.