Literature DB >> 29096511

Mapping the Drude polarizable force field onto a multipole and induced dipole model.

Jing Huang1, Andrew C Simmonett2, Frank C Pickard2, Alexander D MacKerell1, Bernard R Brooks2.   

Abstract

The induced dipole and the classical Drude oscillator represent two major approaches for the explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability into force field-based molecular modeling and simulations. In this work, we explore the equivalency of these two models by comparing condensed phase properties computed using the Drude force field and a multipole and induced dipole (MPID) model. Presented is an approach to map the electrostatic model optimized in the context of the Drude force field onto the MPID model. Condensed phase simulations on water and 15 small model compounds show that without any reparametrization, the MPID model yields properties similar to the Drude force field with both models yielding satisfactory reproduction of a range of experimental values and quantum mechanical data. Our results illustrate that the Drude oscillator model and the point induced dipole model are different representations of essentially the same physical model. However, results indicate the presence of small differences between the use of atomic multipoles and off-center charge sites. Additionally, results on the use of dispersion particle mesh Ewald further support its utility for treating long-range Lennard Jones dispersion contributions in the context of polarizable force fields. The main motivation in demonstrating the transferability of parameters between the Drude and MPID models is that the more than 15 years of development of the Drude polarizable force field can now be used with MPID formalism without the need for dual-thermostat integrators nor self-consistent iterations. This opens up a wide range of new methodological opportunities for polarizable models.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096511      PMCID: PMC5459616          DOI: 10.1063/1.4984113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  64 in total

Review 1.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Random walk in orthogonal space to achieve efficient free-energy simulation of complex systems.

Authors:  Lianqing Zheng; Mengen Chen; Wei Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fragmentation methods: a route to accurate calculations on large systems.

Authors:  Mark S Gordon; Dmitri G Fedorov; Spencer R Pruitt; Lyudmila V Slipchenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Accurate Classical Polarization Solution with No Self-Consistent Field Iterations.

Authors:  Alex Albaugh; Anders M N Niklasson; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Shannon N Greene; Ganesh Kamath; John W Brady; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Interfacing ab initio Quantum Mechanical Method with Classical Drude Osillator Polarizable Model for Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Chemical Reactions.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lu; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Zhen Xia; Jiajing Zhang; Robert Best; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Representation of Ion-Protein Interactions Using the Drude Polarizable Force-Field.

Authors:  Hui Li; Van Ngo; Mauricio Chagas Da Silva; Dennis R Salahub; Karen Callahan; Benoît Roux; Sergei Yu Noskov
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Differential Impact of the Monovalent Ions Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, and Rb⁺ on DNA Conformational Properties.

Authors:  Alexey Savelyev; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 6.475

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability.

Authors:  Richard M Venable; Andreas Krämer; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Predicting partition coefficients of drug-like molecules in the SAMPL6 challenge with Drude polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Ye Ding; You Xu; Cheng Qian; Jinfeng Chen; Jian Zhu; Houhou Huang; Yi Shi; Jing Huang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields.

Authors:  Dmitry Bedrov; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Oleg Borodin; Alexander D MacKerell; Benoît Roux; Christian Schröder
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Force Fields for Small Molecules.

Authors:  Fang-Yu Lin; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

7.  Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.

Authors:  Jacob M Litman; Chengwen Liu; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  An explicit-solvent hybrid QM and MM approach for predicting pKa of small molecules in SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Samarjeet Prasad; Jing Huang; Qiao Zeng; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Multi-phase Boltzmann weighting: accounting for local inhomogeneity in molecular simulations of water-octanol partition coefficients in the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Andreas Krämer; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Tinker-HP: a massively parallel molecular dynamics package for multiscale simulations of large complex systems with advanced point dipole polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Louis Lagardère; Luc-Henri Jolly; Filippo Lipparini; Félix Aviat; Benjamin Stamm; Zhifeng F Jing; Matthew Harger; Hedieh Torabifard; G Andrés Cisneros; Michael J Schnieders; Nohad Gresh; Yvon Maday; Pengyu Y Ren; Jay W Ponder; Jean-Philip Piquemal
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.