Literature DB >> 29096042

What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire.

Melissa M Quinn1, Theodore Smith2, Eileen L Kalmar1, Jennifer M Burgoon1.   

Abstract

Students learn and process information in many different ways. Learning styles are useful as they allow instructors to learn more about students, as well as aid in the development and application of useful teaching approaches and techniques. At the undergraduate level there is a noticeable lack of research on learning style preferences of students enrolled in gross anatomy courses. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire was administered to students enrolled in a large enrollment undergraduate gross anatomy course with laboratory to determine their preferred learning styles. The predominant preferred learning styles of the students (n = 505) enrolled in the gross anatomy course were active (54.9%), sensing (85.1%), visual (81.2%), and sequential (74.4%). Preferred learning styles profiles of particular majors enrolled in the course were also constructed; analyses showed minor variation in the active/reflective dimension. An understanding of students' preferred learning styles can guide course design but it should not be implemented in isolation. It can be strengthened (or weakened) by concurrent use of other tools (e.g., flipped classroom course design). Based on the preferred learning styles of the majority of undergraduate students in this particular gross anatomy course, course activities can be hands on (i.e., active), grounded in concrete information (i.e., sensing), utilize visual representation such as images, figures, models, etc. (i.e., visual), and move in small incremental steps that build on each topic (i.e., sequential). Anat Sci Educ 11: 358-365.
© 2017 American Association of Anatomists. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Keywords:  gross anatomy education; learning styles; learning styles inventory; undergraduate education

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29096042     DOI: 10.1002/ase.1748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  4 in total

1.  Design, Dissemination, and Assessment of NephSIM: A Mobile-Optimized Nephrology Teaching Tool.

Authors:  Samira S Farouk; Rachel Hilburg; Matthew A Sparks
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-12

2.  The effect of using games in teaching conservation.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Jiin Woei Lee; Adeline Hii; Yen Yi Loo; Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Web-Based Immersive Patient Simulator as a Curricular Tool for Objective Structured Clinical Examination Preparation in Surgery: Development and Evaluation.

Authors:  Seung-Hun Chon; Sabrina Hilgers; Ferdinand Timmermann; Thomas Dratsch; Patrick Sven Plum; Felix Berlth; Rabi Datta; Hakan Alakus; Hans Anton Schlößer; Christoph Schramm; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Christiane Bruns; Robert Kleinert
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.143

4.  Interactive workshops as a learning and teaching method for primary healthcare nurses.

Authors:  Eva Mukurunge; Marianne Reid; Annali Fichardt; Mariette Nel
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2021-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.