| Literature DB >> 29093981 |
Kai Hu1, Yonghui Qiao1, Zhifen Deng2, Mingxia Wu1, Wei Liu1.
Abstract
The five anthraquinones compounds (includingEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093981 PMCID: PMC5637848 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1963908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1The chemical structures and pKa values of the studied anthraquinones.
Figure 2Preparation scheme of bis(tetraoxacalix[2]arene[2]triazine)-modified silica gel SPE sorbent (BTO-SPE).
Figure 3IR spectra of APS and BTO-SPE sorbent.
Figure 4Effect of BTO-SPE sorbent amount on the recovery of anthraquinones.
Figure 5Effect of sample pH on the recovery of anthraquinones.
Figure 6Effect of eluting solvent on recovery of anthraquinones.
Figure 7Comparison of the performance of BTO-SPE with C18 sorbent.
Figure 8UHPLC-FLD chromatograms of samples and the standard solution: (A) blank urine sample without SPE cleanup; (B) blank urine sample after C18 SPE cleanup; (C) blank urine sample after BTO-SPE SPE cleanup; (D) urine sample spiked with 0.02 μg mL−1 standard solution of five anthraquinones; (E) standard solution of five anthraquinones (0.5 μg mL−1) (peaks: (1) aloe-emodin; (2) rhein; (3) emodin; (4) chrysophanol; (5) physcion).
Analytical performance data of the proposed method.
| Analyte | Calibration curves |
| Linear range | LOD | LOQ | RSD (%, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ng mL−1 | ng mL−1 | Peak area | Retention time | |||
| Aloe-emodin |
| 0.9997 | 0.012–1.200 | 4.1 | 12.1 | 2.35 | 0.38 |
| Rhein |
| 0.9995 | 0.018–1.800 | 5.7 | 18.2 | 2.21 | 0.42 |
| Emodin |
| 0.9996 | 0.015–1.500 | 5.1 | 15.2 | 1.84 | 0.29 |
| Chrysophanol |
| 0.9993 | 0.012–1.200 | 3.9 | 12.0 | 2.48 | 0.26 |
| Physcion |
| 0.9996 | 0.013–1.300 | 4.4 | 13.1 | 3.05 | 0.22 |
The interday and intraday precision and recoveries of the method.
| Analytes | Spiked amount (ng/g) | Intraday ( | Interday ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | ||
| Aloe-emodin | 20 | 97.3 | 2.26 | 96.7 | 2.88 |
| 100 | 96.8 | 2.58 | 97.5 | 3.15 | |
| 500 | 95.2 | 2.42 | 94.8 | 3.36 | |
|
| |||||
| Rhein | 20 | 104.3 | 2.03 | 102.8 | 3.28 |
| 100 | 97.5 | 2.83 | 98.1 | 2.95 | |
| 500 | 96.3 | 2.78 | 97.4 | 3.45 | |
|
| |||||
| Emodin | 20 | 105.6 | 2.75 | 106.6 | 3.47 |
| 100 | 96.7 | 2.63 | 95.8 | 4.58 | |
| 500 | 94.9 | 2.86 | 95.4 | 3.48 | |
|
| |||||
| Chrysophanol | 20 | 97.7 | 2.05 | 98.0 | 2.85 |
| 100 | 98.3 | 2.83 | 97.7 | 3.15 | |
| 500 | 95.8 | 2.75 | 96.2 | 3.42 | |
|
| |||||
| Physcion | 20 | 104.6 | 2.46 | 105.6 | 4.03 |
| 100 | 95.8 | 2.94 | 96.3 | 3.85 | |
| 500 | 96.8 | 2.81 | 96.4 | 3.07 | |
Determination of anthraquinones in urine from five patients after oral rhubarb decoction.
| Sample number | Aloe-emodin | Rhein | Emodin | Chrysophanol | Physcion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| (1) | 0.078 | 0.662 | 0.047 | 0.152 | 0.038 |
| (2) | 0.054 | 0.782 | 0.032 | 0.236 | 0.027 |
| (3) | 0.068 | 0.715 | 0.038 | 0.132 | 0.038 |
| (4) | 0.062 | 0.813 | 0.071 | 0.086 | 0.034 |
| (5) | 0.085 | 0.764 | 0.058 | 0.124 | 0.056 |
Comparison of BTO-SPE-FLD method with other methods for the determination of anthraquinones.
| Clean-up | Determination technique | Linearity | Recoveries (%) | RSD | LOD | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLB-SPE | MEKCa | 5–50 | 98–107 | <2.55 | 0.50–0.58 | [ |
| C18-SPE | HPLC-FLD | 0.0210–19.52 | 94.2–110.4 | <7.4 | 0.007–0.0133 | [ |
| MIP-MSPDb | HPLC-UV | 1–200 | 91.2–101.4 | 5.3–7.1 | 0.23–0.28 | [ |
| Soxhlet extraction | CD-MEKCc | 3.86–85 | 91.1–100.08 | 1.12–2.01 | 0.75–1.15 | [ |
| BTO-SPE | UHPLC-FLD | 0.012–1.8 | 94.9–105.6 | 2.03–2.86 | 0.0039–0.0057 | This method |
amicellar electrokinetic chromatography; bmolecularly imprinted polymer-matrix solid-phase dispersion; ccyclodextrin-modified micellar electrokinetic chromatography.