| Literature DB >> 29093705 |
Yanying Zhang1,2,3, Qingsong Yang1,4, Juan Ling1, Joy D Van Nostrand3, Zhou Shi3, Jizhong Zhou3, Junde Dong1,2.
Abstract
Diazotrophic communities make an essential contribution to the productivity through providing newEntities:
Keywords: diazotrophs; high-throughput sequencing; mangroves; microbial community; nifH; sulfate-reducing bacteria
Year: 2017 PMID: 29093705 PMCID: PMC5651520 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Environmental characteristics of rhizosphere sediment samples (n = 6) from the three mangrove species (expressed as mean value and standard error, SE).
| TC (mg/g) | 57.50 ± 6.30 | 19.10 ± 1.88 | 23.27 ± 4.00 |
| TN (mg/g) | 2.83 ± 0.46 | 1.34 ± 0.18 | 1.36 ± 0.25 |
| TP (mg/g) | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.06 |
| AK (mg/g) | 0.61 ± 0.07 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.03 |
| C/N | 21.32 ± 1.31 | 14.60 ± 0.57 | 17.67 ± 1.08 |
| N/P | 7.84 ± 0.79 | 8.05 ± 0.57 | 4.63 ± 0.10 |
Diversity indices of 16S rRNA gene and nifH sequences from rhizosphere sediments (n = 6) of three mangrove species (expressed as mean value and standard error, SE).
| 16S rRNA | 16S rRNA | 16S rRNA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mean ± | (mean ± | (mean ± | ||||
| Chao 1 | 13,364 ± 328 | 739 ± 33 | 11,511 ± 593 | 682 ± 40 | 11,549 ± 686 | 716 ± 29 |
| OTUs | 6,622 ± 159 | 630 ± 26 | 5,786 ± 254 | 574 ± 27 | 5,812 ± 288 | 610 ± 26 |
| Shannon–Wiener ( | 7.88 ± 0.06 | 4.90 ± 0.13 | 7.63 ± 0.08 | 4.83 ± 0.09 | 7.57 ± 0.12 | 4.89 ± 0.09 |
| Simpson | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.001 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
Non-parametric analyses to test dissimilarity of 16S rRNA and nifH gene communities between any two mangrove rhizosphere sediments (RA, R. apiculata; AM, A. marina; CT, C. tagal).
| Adonis | ANOSIM | MRPP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statistic-value | Statistic-value | Statistic-value | ||||
| RA vs. AM | 4.564 | 0.691 | 0.380 | |||
| RA vs. CT | 6.199 | 0.748 | 0.379 | |||
| AM vs. CT | 2.719 | 0.347 | 0.415 | |||
| 16S rRNA | ||||||
| RA vs. AM | 3.196 | 0.737 | 0.530 | |||
| RA vs. CT | 3.295 | 0.615 | 0.537 | |||
| AM vs. CT | 1.920 | 0.246 | 0.558 | |||
Monte Carlo permutation test of relationship between environmental attributes and 16S rRNA and nifH gene high-throughput sequencing data.
| 16S rRNA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | 0.341 | 0.534 | ||
| TN | 0.278 | 0.104 | 0.293 | 0.073 |
| TC | 0.377 | 0.509 | ||
| AK | 0.360 | 0.404 | ||
| C/N | 0.320 | 0.559 | ||
| N/P | 0.193 | 0.196 | 0.403 | |