| Literature DB >> 33786421 |
Natalia G Erazo1,2, Jeff S Bowman1,3,2.
Abstract
Mangrove-dominated estuaries host a diverse microbial assemblage that facilitates nutrient and carbon conversions and could play a vital role in maintaining ecosystem health. In this study, we used 16S rRNA gene analysis, metabolic inference, nutrient concentrations, and δ13C and δ15N isotopes to evaluate the impact of land use change on near-shore biogeochemical cycles and microbial community structures within mangrove-dominated estuaries. Samples in close proximity to active shrimp aquaculture were high in NH4 +, NO3 - NO2 -, and PO4 3-; lower in microbial community and metabolic diversity; and dominated by putative nitrifiers, denitrifies, and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Near intact mangrove forests we observed the presence of potential nitrogen fixers of the genus Calothrix and order Rhizobiales. We identified possible indicators of aquaculture effluents such as Pseudomonas balearica, Ponitmonas salivi brio , family Chromatiaceae, and genus Arcobacter. These results highlight the sensitivity of the estuarine-mangrove microbial community, and their ecosystem functions, to land use changes.Entities:
Keywords: Applied Microbiology; Aquaculture Sustainability; Environmental Health; Invertebrate Aquaculture; Microorganism; Pollution
Year: 2021 PMID: 33786421 PMCID: PMC7994199 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: iScience ISSN: 2589-0042
Figure 1Map of study site in coastal Ecuador
(A) Study site in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, South America.
(B) Location of the two ecological reserves: Cayapas-Mataje (CM) and Muisne (M).
(C and D) (C) Map of land use changes in CM and (D) map of land use changes in M; green shows mangrove forest cover, pink shows shrimp aquaculture cover, and yellow circles show sampling locations. The base maps were generated from data obtained in Hamilton (2020).
Environmental properties for high, intermediate, and low disturbed mangrove forests
| Disturbance | Phosphate (μM) | Nitrate+nitrite (μM) | Ammonia (μM) | Chlorophyll (μg L-1) | δ13C (range) | δ15N (range) | Samples (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 0.23 ± 0.23 | 0.46 ± 0.54 | 0.39 ± 0.36 | 11.52 ± 5.86 | −18.45, −27.76 | 0.36, 11.08 | 89 |
| Intermediate | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.87 ± 0.46 | 1.77 ± 0.60 | 8.80 ± 2.58 | −18.49, −29.00 | 0.54, 8.84 | 34 |
| High | 2.41 ± 1.01 | 9.91 ± 8.75 | 12.79 ± 7.50 | 30.75 ± 23.52 | −27.01, −32.08 | 0.73, 5.86 | 29 |
| p Value | 9.10 × 1011 | 8.2 × 10−12 | 2.20 × 10−16 | 1.70 × 10−6 | – | – | – |
Mean value.
Low and high values provided.
Low disturbance (Cayapas-Mataje = 88, Muisne = 1).
Intermediate disturbance (Cayapas-Mataje = 33, Muisne = 1).
High disturbance (Muisne = 29).
p Value (Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 2Biogeochemical and bacterial signatures
(A–C) (A) Nitrogen (ammonia and nitrate + nitrite) and phosphate species concentrations, (B) mean of genome size versus N:P ratio, (C) mean of number of 16S copies versus N:P ratio and Spearman's correlation.
(D and E) (D) N∗ value and (E) chlorophyll values of three levels of disturbance. Kruskal-Wallis test and p values with Dunn post-test. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
(F) δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures.
Figure 3Alpha diversity
(A–C) (A) Bacterial community diversity, (B) archaeal diversity, and (C) metabolic diversity for the three levels of disturbance using InvSimpson metric. Kruskal-Wallis test and p values with Dunn post-test; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure 4Microbial and archaeal signatures of disturbance
(A and B) (A) Differentially abundant bacterial taxa (top 60) in high, intermediate, and low disturbance result from DESeq2 analysis; (B) differentially abundant archaeal taxa result from DESeq2. Samples and taxa were clustered using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance.
Figure 5Bacterial and archaeal community structure
(A–E) Correspondence analysis (CA) ordination of (A) the bacterial community for samples that cluster in ordination space have similar community compositions, whereas those that are dispersed are less similar. (B) Square cosine components for samples; large value of cos2 shows a relatively large contribution to the total distance for bacterial community. (C) CA ordination for archaeal community. (D) Square cosine components for samples for archaeal community. (E) Contribution of top 10 taxa with highest cos2 values for archaeal community (see Figure S2).
Figure 6Metabolic pathways and nitrogen cycle enzyme indicators for levels of disturbance
(A) CCA ordination for metabolic pathways showing top four pathways with cos2 ranging from 0.6–0.8. Large value of cos2 shows a relatively large contribution to the total distance for bacterial metabolic prediction.
(B) Heatmap of key nitrogen cycle enzymes (Bray-Curtis distance) for the bacterial community (see Figure S5).
Significant correlated taxa with ammonia and nitrate+nitrite result from WGCNA
| Taxon | Map ID | Module color | GS.Nitrogen | p.GS.Nitrogen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.87 | Blue | 0.74 | 6.35 × 10−25 | |
| 0.94 | Blue | 0.69 | 3.37 × 10−20 | |
| 0.97 | Blue | 0.69 | 4.17 × 10−20 | |
| 0.82 | Blue | 0.69 | 5.07 × 10−20 | |
| 0.82 | Blue | 0.67 | 2.62 × 10−18 | |
| Actinobacteria bacterium IMCC26256 | 0.88 | Blue | 0.62 | 8.57 × 10−15 |
| 0.91 | Blue | 0.61 | 3.62 × 10−14 | |
| 0.92 | Blue | 0.61 | 5.70 × 10−14 | |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.59 | 5.75 × 10−13 | |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.59 | 1.52 × 10−15 | |
| 0.94 | Blue | 0.58 | 1.29 × 10−12 | |
| 0.88 | Blue | 0.58 | 1.80 × 10−12 | |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.58 | 3.36 × 10−12 | |
| 0.87 | Blue | 0.57 | 9.00 × 10−12 | |
| 0.87 | Blue | 0.56 | 2.06 × 10−11 | |
| 565 | Blue | 0.56 | 2.19 × 10−11 | |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.54 | 3.96 × 10−10 | |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.53 | 1.58 × 10−9 | |
| Actinobacteria bacterium IMCC26256 | 0.88 | Blue | 0.53 | 1.60 × 10−9 |
| 0.92 | Blue | 0.51 | 1.94 × 10−12 | |
| Actinobacteria bacterium IMCC26256 | 0.88 | Blue | 0.50 | 9.01 × 10−12 |
| Chromatiaceae bacterium 2141T.STBD.0c.01a | 0.95 | Blue | 0.49 | 8.88 × 10−8 |
| 0.98 | Blue | 0.48 | 1.48 × 10−7 | |
| 0.94 | Blue | 0.45 | 2.19 × 10−6 | |
| 0.97 | Blue | 0.45 | 3.59 × 10−6 | |
| 0.87 | Blue | 0.44 | 4.27 × 10−6 | |
| 0.91 | Blue | 0.40 | 1.29 × 10−4 | |
| 0.86 | Pink | 0.90 | 1.45 × 10−53 | |
| Actinobacteria bacterium IMCC26256 | 0.88 | Pink | 0.90 | 9.62 × 10−53 |
| 0.96 | Pink | 0.89 | 1.98 × 10−50 | |
| 0.82 | Pink | 0.89 | 5.18 × 10−50 | |
| 0.89 | Pink | 0.87 | 4.75 × 10−46 | |
| 0.8 | Pink | 0.85 | 1.19 × 10−40 | |
| 0.87 | Pink | 0.85 | 2.24 × 10−40 | |
| 0.95 | Pink | 0.85 | 9.07 × 10−40 | |
| Actinobacteria bacterium IMCC26256 | 0.88 | Pink | 0.84 | 1.34 × 10−39 |
| 0.88 | Pink | 0.83 | 7.44 × 10−37 | |
| 0.91 | Pink | 0.82 | 1.31 × 10−34 | |
| 0.89 | Pink | 0.81 | 3.97 × 10−33 | |
| 0.84 | Pink | 0.80 | 3.58 × 10−32 | |
| 0.92 | Pink | 0.79 | 1.73 × 10−31 | |
| 0.8 | Pink | 0.79 | 1.89 × 10−30 | |
| 0.91 | Pink | 0.79 | 2.31 × 10−30 | |
| 0.98 | Pink | 0.78 | 7.76 × 10−30 | |
| 0.98 | Pink | 0.72 | 2.75 × 10−23 | |
| 0.91 | Pink | 0.56 | 2.91 × 10−11 | |
| 0.9 | Pink | 0.53 | 7.85 × 10−10 | |
| 0.87 | Pink | 0.53 | 9.21 × 10−10 | |
| Marinifilaceae bacterium SPP2 | 0.85 | Pink | 0.47 | 3.13 × 10−7 |
| 0.91 | Pink | 0.40 | 1.07 × 10−4 | |
| 0.92 | Yellow | −0.57 | 4.73 × 10−12 | |
| 0.94 | Yellow | −0.50 | 1.58 × 10−8 | |
| 0.99 | Yellow | −0.49 | 4.25 × 10−8 | |
| 0.96 | Yellow | −0.47 | 4.55 × 10−7 | |
| Flavobacteriaceae bacterium | 0.91 | Yellow | −0.45 | 2.36 × 10−6 |
| 0.94 | Yellow | −0.42 | 3.22 × 10−5 | |
| 0.89 | Yellow | −0.39 | 2.45 × 10−4 | |
| 0.87 | Yellow | −0.38 | 7.07 × 10−4 | |
| 0.92 | Yellow | −0.37 | 1.17 × 10−3 | |
| 0.89 | Yellow | −0.36 | 2.84 × 10−3 | |
| 0.81 | Yellow | −0.34 | 6.15 × 10−3 | |
| 0.94 | Yellow | −0.34 | 9.57 × 10−3 |
Map ID phylogenetic classification. Value = 1 represents a perfect placement on the tree.
GS = Pearson correlation to ammonia and nitrate + nitrite.
p.GS = p-adjusted value (Bonferroni correction) for correlation to ammonia and nitrate+nitrite.
Represents presence of nitrogenase enzyme EC.1.18.61.
Represents presence of nitrate reductase enzyme EC.1.7.99.4.
Represents presence of nitrate reductase enzyme EC.1.7.1.4.
Significant correlated taxa with salinity result from WGCNA
| Taxon | Map ID | Module color | GS.Salinity | p.GS.Salinity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.94 | Red | 0.53 | 8.19 × 10−10 | |
| Kordia sp. SMS9 | 0.91 | Red | 0.53 | 1.49 × 10−9 |
| 0.93 | Red | 0.52 | 2.66 × 10−9 | |
| 1.00 | Red | 0.50 | 2.28 × 10−8 | |
| 1.00 | Red | 0.47 | 4.36 × 10−7 | |
| 0.98 | Red | 0.47 | 4.56 × 10−7 | |
| 0.82 | Red | 0.46 | 8.37 × 10−7 | |
| 0.95 | Red | 0.46 | 1.02 × 10−6 | |
| 0.96 | Red | 0.44 | 7.04 × 10−6 | |
| 0.82 | Red | 0.41 | 9.08 × 10−5 | |
| 1.00 | Red | 0.40 | 1.10 × 10−4 | |
| 0.89 | Red | 0.40 | 1.64 × 10−4 | |
| 1.00 | Red | 0.40 | 1.98 × 10−4 | |
| 1.00 | Red | 0.39 | 2.07 × 10−4 | |
| 0.87 | Red | 0.39 | 3.93 × 10−4 |
Map ID phylogenetic classification. Value = 1 represents a perfect placement on the tree.
GS = Pearson correlation to salinity.
p.GS = p-adjusted value (Bonferroni correction) for correlation to salinity.
Number of enzymes copies for nitrogenase and nitrate reductase enzymes and top 10 associated taxa
| Taxon | Nitrogenase EC.1.18.6.1 | Nitrate reductase EC.1.7.99.4 | Nitrate reductase NADH EC.1.7.1.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16,984 | 4,246 | 0 | |
| Genus | 15,186 | 3,796 | 0 |
| 38,937 | 0 | 0 | |
| Family Rhodobacteraceae | 0 | 0 | 1,273 |
| 0 | 5,418 | 5,418 | |
| 0 | 0 | 23,205 | |
| 0 | 8,288 | 0 | |
| 0 | 10,956 | 21,912 | |
| 0 | 4,773 | 0 | |
| Class Betaproteobacteria | 0 | 17,102 | 0 |