Literature DB >> 29093225

Specialized mutualisms may constrain the geographical distribution of flowering plants.

Karl J Duffy1, Steven D Johnson2.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that the geographical distributions of plants are governed mainly by abiotic variables. However, interactions with other organisms, such as pollinators, also have the potential to influence plant distributions. To investigate this, we developed niche models for 32 plant taxa that have specialized pollination systems and which are native to a biodiversity hotspot (South Africa). We found that the distributions of these taxa are best explained by a combination of biotic (pollinators) and abiotic factors, rather than by abiotic factors alone. For approximately 66% of these plant taxa, pollinator distributions were the factor that provided the best predictor of their niches. Furthermore, co-occurrence of these plants and their pollinators was generally not explained solely by shared abiotic niches, and thus probably reflects broad-scale positive ecological interactions. These results are consistent with the proposal that pollinator distributions may constrain plant distributions and highlight the general potential for species distributions to be shaped by positive interactions with other species. This has important consequences for predicting how distributions of species might change in the face of loss of their key mutualists.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental heterogeneity; facilitation; mutualism; niche; species distributions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29093225      PMCID: PMC5698652          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  25 in total

1.  Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe.

Authors:  Wilfried Thuiller; Sandra Lavorel; Miguel B Araújo; Martin T Sykes; I Colin Prentice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands.

Authors:  J C Biesmeijer; S P M Roberts; M Reemer; R Ohlemüller; M Edwards; T Peeters; A P Schaffers; S G Potts; R Kleukers; C D Thomas; J Settele; W E Kunin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization.

Authors:  D W Schemske; C C Horvitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Adaptive foraging behaviour of individual pollinators and the coexistence of co-flowering plants.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Song; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The pollination niche and its role in the diversification and maintenance of the southern African flora.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Requirements for plant coexistence through pollination niche partitioning.

Authors:  Gita Benadi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Combining physiological threshold knowledge to species distribution models is key to improving forecasts of the future niche for macroalgae.

Authors:  Brezo Martínez; Francisco Arenas; Alba Trilla; Rosa M Viejo; Francisco Carreño
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Rod Peakall; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The long and the short of it: a global analysis of hawkmoth pollination niches and interaction networks.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Marcela Moré; Felipe W Amorim; William A Haber; Gordon W Frankie; Dara A Stanley; Andrea A Coccuci; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 5.608

10.  Specialized mutualisms may constrain the geographical distribution of flowering plants.

Authors:  Karl J Duffy; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  4 in total

1.  Specialized mutualisms may constrain the geographical distribution of flowering plants.

Authors:  Karl J Duffy; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Polyploidy Expands the Range of Centaurium (Gentianaceae).

Authors:  Enrique Maguilla; Marcial Escudero; Vania Jiménez-Lobato; Zoila Díaz-Lifante; Cristina Andrés-Camacho; Juan Arroyo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Modelling sexually deceptive orchid species distributions under future climates: the importance of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Spyros Tsiftsis; Vladan Djordjević
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Suitability of Habitats in Nepal for Dactylorhiza hatagirea Now and under Predicted Future Changes in Climate.

Authors:  Bikram Shrestha; Spyros Tsiftsis; Deep Jyoti Chapagain; Chhatra Khadka; Prakash Bhattarai; Neelima Kayastha Shrestha; Marta Alicja Kolanowska; Pavel Kindlmann
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.