Literature DB >> 24352943

Adaptive foraging behaviour of individual pollinators and the coexistence of co-flowering plants.

Zhiyuan Song1, Marcus W Feldman.   

Abstract

Although pollinators can play a central role in determining the structure and stability of plant communities, little is known about how their adaptive foraging behaviours at the individual level, e.g. flower constancy, structure these interactions. Here, we construct a mathematical model that integrates individual adaptive foraging behaviour and population dynamics of a community consisting of two plant species and a pollinator species. We find that adaptive foraging at the individual level, as a complementary mechanism to adaptive foraging at the species level, can further enhance the coexistence of plant species through niche partitioning between conspecific pollinators. The stabilizing effect is stronger than that of unbiased generalists when there is also strong competition between plant species over other resources, but less so than that of multiple specialist species. This suggests that adaptive foraging in mutualistic interactions can have a very different impact on the plant community structure from that in predator-prey interactions. In addition, the adaptive behaviour of individual pollinators may cause a sharp regime shift for invading plant species. These results indicate the importance of integrating individual adaptive behaviour and population dynamics for the conservation of native plant communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive foraging; flower constancy; mutualism; plant species coexistence; population dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24352943      PMCID: PMC3871311          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.

Authors:  Brian O Ma; Peter A Abrams; Chad E Brassil
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Population dynamics of plant and pollinator communities: stability reconsidered.

Authors:  Gita Benadi; Nico Blüthgen; Thomas Hovestadt; Hans-Joachim Poethke
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Flower constancy in insect pollinators: Adaptive foraging behaviour or cognitive limitation?

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions.

Authors:  Jane Memmott; Nickolas M Waser; Mary V Price
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  'Adaptive Dynamics' vs. 'adaptive dynamics'.

Authors:  P A Abrams
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance.

Authors:  Jordi Bascompte; Pedro Jordano; Jens M Olesen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity.

Authors:  Ugo Bastolla; Miguel A Fortuna; Alberto Pascual-García; Antonio Ferrera; Bartolo Luque; Jordi Bascompte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Plant-animal mutualism in biological markets: evolutionary and ecological dynamics driven by non-heritable phenotypic variance.

Authors:  Zhiyuan Song; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Pollinator Foraging Strategies in Mixed Floral Arrays: Density Effects and Floral Constancy

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Conspecifics as informers and competitors: an experimental study in foraging bumble-bees.

Authors:  Mathilde Baude; Étienne Danchin; Marianne Mugabo; Isabelle Dajoz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  7 in total

1.  Requirements for plant coexistence through pollination niche partitioning.

Authors:  Gita Benadi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Introduced ecological engineers drive behavioral changes of grasshoppers, consequently linking to its abundance in two grassland plant communities.

Authors:  Deli Wang; Venuste Nkurunziza; Nicholas A Barber; Hui Zhu; Jingting Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Predictability of bee community composition after floral removals differs by floral trait group.

Authors:  Katherine R Urban-Mead
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Specialized mutualisms may constrain the geographical distribution of flowering plants.

Authors:  Karl J Duffy; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Determination of Flower Constancy in Bombus atratus Franklin and Bombus bellicosus Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae) through Palynological Analysis of Nectar and Corbicular Pollen Loads.

Authors:  N Rossi; E Santos; S Salvarrey; N Arbulo; C Invernizzi
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  Pollination success following loss of a frequent pollinator: the role of compensatory visitation by other effective pollinators.

Authors:  Allysa C Hallett; Randall J Mitchell; Evan R Chamberlain; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Pollinator Foraging Adaptation and Coexistence of Competing Plants.

Authors:  Tomás A Revilla; Vlastimil Křivan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.