| Literature DB >> 29089626 |
Ji Wang1, Sisi Yan1, Haisi Xiao1, Huijuan Zhou1, Shuiping Liu1, Yu Zeng1, Biying Liu1, Rongfang Li1, Zhihang Yuan1, Jing Wu1, Jine Yi1, Yarou Bao Sero Razack1, Lixin Wen2,3.
Abstract
Obesity, which is associated with dietary habits, has become a global social problem and causes many metabolic diseases. In China, both percentages of adult obesity and overweight are far lower compared to western countries. It was designed to increase the two levels of daily intake in human, namely 3.8% and 6.5%, which are recommendatory intake (25 g/d) and Chinese citizens' practical intake (41.4 g/d), respectively. The mice were respectively fed with feeds added with soybean oil, lard or the oil blended by both for 12 weeks. In the mice fed with diet containing 3.8% of the three oils or 6.5% blended oil, their body weight, body fat rate, cross-sectional area of adipocytes, adipogenesis and lipogenesis in adipose were decreased, whereas hydrolysis of triglyserides in adipose was increased. This study demonstrated that the oil mixture containing lard and soybean oil had a remarkable anti-obesity effect. It suggests that the traditional Chinese dietary habits using oils blended with lard and soybean oil, might be one of the factors of lower percentages of overweight and obesity in China, and that the increasing of dietary oil intake and the changing of its component resulted in the increasing of obesity rate in China over the past decades.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29089626 PMCID: PMC5665938 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14704-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of weight and lipid in serum and adipose in mice fed with different oils. Abbreviations: TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Results were presented as means ± s.e.m. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc analysis (n = 10). # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01 compared with congener oil at 3.8% oil group. Different lowercase superscripts (a-c) indicate significant differences among the same oil intake level groups in the same row at P < 0.05 level, different lowercase superscripts (A–C) indicate extremely significant differences among the same oil intake level groups in the same row at P < 0.01 level.
| Parameters | 3.8% oil | 6.5% oil | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean oil | Lard oil | Blended oil | Soybean oil | Lard oil | Blended oil | |
| Initial body weight(g) | 25.02 ± 0.49 | 24.59 ± 0.39 | 24.33 ± 0.61 | 24.86 ± 0.49 | 24.75 ± 0.22 | 23.85 ± 0.39 |
| Final body weight(g) | 30.54 ± 0.65 | 29.70 ± 0.67 | 28.57 ± 0.63 | 32.67 ± 1.08B# | 29.70 ± 0.67 A | 28.80 ± 0.73 A |
| Serum TG (mmol/l) | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 0.40 ± 0.02a | 0.49 ± 0.02b |
| Serum HDL-C (mmol/l) | 1.98 ± 0.07a | 1.94 ± 0.06a | 2.22 ± 0.09b | 2.04 ± 0.07a | 1.98 ± 0.06 A | 2.31 ± 0.11bB |
| Serum LDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.01 A# | 0.18 ± 0.01 A | 0.22 ± 0.01B## |
| HDL-C/ LDL-C in serum | 12.85 ± 0.46a | 12.27 ± 0.59 A | 14.77 ± 0.89bB | 11.28 ± 0.72 | 11.20 ± 0.37 | 10.65 ± 0.75## |
Figure 1Effect of different types of oils and contents on adipose. (a) Epididymal adipose tissue; (b) Sections of epididymal adipose tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); (c) Body fat rate; (d) CSA (cross sectional area) of epididymal adipose cells; (e) Adipose TG (triglyceride); (f) Adipose TC (total cholesterol). Results were presented as means ± s.e.m. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc analysis (n = 10 in c,e and f; n=5 in d). **indicated p < 0.01 when compared with different types of oils at the same content; *indicated p < 0.05 when compared with different types of oils at the same content. ##Indicated p < 0.01 when compared 6.5% oil with 3.8% oil groups.
Figure 2Effect of different types of oils and contents on liver. (a) Liver tissue; (b) Sections of liver stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); (c) Liver index; (d) Liver TG; (e) Liver TC. Results were presented as means ± s.e.m. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc analysis (n = 10). **indicated p < 0.01 when compared with different types of oils at the same content; *indicated p < 0.05 when compared with different types of oils at the same content. ##Indicated p < 0.01 when compared 6.5% oils with 3.8% oil groups. #Indicated p < 0.05 when compared with 6.5% oil with 3.8% oil groups.
Figure 3Effect of different types of oils and content on mRNA expression in epididymal adipose tissue. (a) Expression of PPARγ mRNA; (b) Expression of CEBPα mRNA; (c) Expression of SREBP-1 mRNA; (d) Expression of FAS mRNA; (e) Expression of ATGL mRNA; (f) Expression of APN mRNA; (g) Expression of Leptin mRNA. Results were presented as means ± s.e.m. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc analysis (n = 5). **indicated p < 0.01 when compared with different types of oils at the same content; *indicated p < 0.05 when compared with different types of oils at the same content. ##Indicated p < 0.01 when compared 6.5% oils with 3.8% oil groups. #Indicated p < 0.05 when compared with 6.5% oil with oil 3.8% oil groups.
Figure 4Effect of various kinds of oils and content on protein expression levels in epididymal adipose tissues. (a)Western blot analysis showed the levels of PPARγ, SREBP-1, ATGL, FAS, GAPDH. (b) Expression of PPARγ protein; (c) Expression of SREBP-1 protein; (d) Expression of FAS protein; (e) Expression of ATGL protein. Results were presented as means ± s.e.m. Comparisons between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with the LSD post hoc analysis (n = 3). **indicated P < 0.01 when compared with different types of oils at the same content; *indicated P < 0.05 when compared with different types of oils at the same content. ##Indicated P < 0.01 when compared 6.5% oils with 3.8% oil groups. #Indicated P < 0.05 when compared with 6.5% oil with oil 3.8% oil groups.