Literature DB >> 16699097

Evaluation of the inclusion of soybean oil and soybean processing by-products to soybean meal on nutrient composition and digestibility in swine and poultry.

K J Bruce1, L K Karr-Lilienthal, K E Zinn, L L Pope, D C Mahan, N D Fastinger, M Watts, P L Utterback, C M Parsons, E O Castaneda, M Ellis, G C Fahey.   

Abstract

This experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of selected soybean (SB) processing byproducts (gums, oil, soapstock, weeds/trash) when added back to soybean meal (SBM) during processing on the resulting nutrient composition, protein quality, nutrient digestibility by swine, and true metabolizable energy (TMEn) content and standardized AA digestibility by poultry. To measure ileal DM and nutrient digestibility, pigs were surgically fitted with a T-cannula in the distal ileum. The concentration of TMEn and the standardized AA digestibility by poultry were determined using the precision fed cecectomized rooster assay. Treatments in the swine experiment included SBM with no by-products; SBM with 1% gum; SBM with 3% gum; SBM with 0.5% soapstock; SBM with 1.5% soapstock; SBM with 2% weeds/trash; SBM with a combination of 3% gum, 1.5% soapstock, and 2% weeds/trash; SBM with 5.4% soybean oil; and roasted SB. A 10 x 10 Latin square design was utilized. The experiment was conducted at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and at The Ohio State University, Columbus. In the swine experiment, apparent ileal DM, OM, CP, and AA digestibilities were reduced (P < 0.05) when pigs consumed the combination by-product diet compared with the diet containing no by-products. Apparent ileal digestibilities of DM, CP, and total essential, total nonessential, and total AA were lower (P < 0.05) for any diet containing by-products compared with the diet with no by-products. Apparent ileal digestibilities of DM, OM, CP, and AA were lower (P < 0.05) for the roasted SB-compared with the SB oil-containing diet. In the rooster experiment, TMEn values were greater (P < 0.05) for roasted SB compared with SBM with no by-products and increased linearly as the addition of soapstock increased. Individual, total essential, total nonessential, and total AA digestibilities were lower (P < 0.05) for roosters fed roasted SB versus SBM devoid of by-products. Gums, soapstock, and weeds/trash reduce the nutritive value of the resultant meal when they are added back during processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16699097     DOI: 10.2527/2006.8461403x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Chemical composition, energy content, and amino acid digestibility in Cyperus esculentus co-products fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Junyan Zhou; Yifan Chen; Li Wang; Hongmei Pan; Qile Hu; Huangwei Shi; Changhua Lai
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Anti-obesity effect of a traditional Chinese dietary habit-blending lard with vegetable oil while cooking.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Sisi Yan; Haisi Xiao; Huijuan Zhou; Shuiping Liu; Yu Zeng; Biying Liu; Rongfang Li; Zhihang Yuan; Jing Wu; Jine Yi; Yarou Bao Sero Razack; Lixin Wen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Development and Validation of Equations for Predicting the Metabolizable Energy Value of Double-Low Rapeseed Cake for Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Qile Hu; Peili Li; Changhua Lai; Defa Li; Jianjun Zang; Shouqing Ni
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Available for millions of years but discovered through the last decade: Insects as a source of nutrients and energy in animal diets.

Authors:  Bartosz Kierończyk; Mateusz Rawski; Zuzanna Mikołajczak; Natalia Homska; Jan Jankowski; Katarzyna Ognik; Agata Józefiak; Jan Mazurkiewicz; Damian Józefiak
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  The Effect of Inclusion Level of Soybean Oil and Palm Oil on Their Digestible and Metabolizable Energy Content Determined with the Difference and Regression Method When Fed to Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Yongbo Su; Yue She; Qiang Huang; Chuanxin Shi; Zhongchao Li; Chengfei Huang; Xiangshu Piao; Defa Li
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.509

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.