Literature DB >> 29088520

Exploring the Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in South Dakota Women and the Importance of Provider Education.

Tess L Weber1, Ashley Briggs2,3, Jessica D Hanson1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, including the intrauterine device (IUD) and the birth control implant, are the most effective form of prescribed birth control for pregnancy prevention. However, uptake of this highly effective form of birth control is slow. The purpose of this study was to explore use of the LARC methods in South Dakota women prescribed contraception and the importance of the provider in promoting this type of contraception.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of female patients who had been prescribed contraception at one of five locations in a South Dakota hospital system. Records were obtained through electronic health records for a six-month period. Descriptive analysis was performed using chi-square with counts and percentages. Logistic regression was used to determine differences in LARC prescriptions by patient age and provider title.
RESULTS: A total of 2,174 individual patients were included in analysis. Of the 378 (17.4 percent) who were prescribed LARC methods, most (78.6 percent) were prescribed an IUD. Younger women (aged 11-19) were less likely to be prescribed LARCs compared to women aged 30-34. There were also significant differences in LARC prescriptions by provider type. Futhermore, we noted differences in LARC prescriptions for a provider who received a specific education and training on LARC from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
CONCLUSIONS: There are many important factors to consider by the patient when choosing the most appropriate contraceptive method, including safety, effectiveness, accessibility, and affordability. Provider education may play an important role in promoting LARC methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29088520      PMCID: PMC6022839     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S D Med        ISSN: 0038-3317


  16 in total

1.  Contraception for Adolescents: Focusing on Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives (LARC) to Improve Reproductive Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

2.  Preparing daughters: the context of rurality on mothers' role in contraception.

Authors:  Joanne Noone; Heather M Young
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Clinician knowledge about use of intrauterine devices in adolescents in South Carolina AHEC.

Authors:  Vanessa A Diaz; Nikki Hughes; Lori M Dickerson; Andrea M Wessell; Peter J Carek
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Tessa Madden; Colleen McNicholas; Jennifer Mullersman; Christina M Buckel; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-05-08

6.  Safety and efficacy of a single-rod etonogestrel implant (Implanon): results from 11 international clinical trials.

Authors:  Philip Darney; Ashlesha Patel; Kimberly Rosen; Lena S Shapiro; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women, 2009-2012.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Jenna Jerman; Megan L Kavanaugh
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Comparisons of Contraceptive Use between Rural and Urban Teens.

Authors:  Savannah Geske; Randal Quevillon; Cindy Struckman-Johnson; Keith Hansen
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services—United States, 2005-2013.

Authors:  Lisa Romero; Karen Pazol; Lee Warner; Lorrie Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Ghenet Besera; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Tara Jatlaoui; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program.

Authors:  Cristina Wallace Huff; Joseph E Potter; Kristine Hopkins
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-12-13

2.  Quality of websites about long-acting reversible contraception: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catrin Eriksson; Matilda Skinstad; Susanne Georgsson; Tommy Carlsson
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.