Jonathan D Jackson1,2, Dorene M Rentz1,2,3, Sarah L Aghjayan3, Rachel F Buckley1,2,4, Tamy-Fee Meneide1, Reisa A Sperling1,2,3, Rebecca E Amariglio1,2,3. 1. Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114-2621, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Center for Alzheimer Research and Treatment, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
Objective: subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) have been proposed as a means of identifying individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the utility of SCCs has not been well-explored for African-Americans, who are twice as likely to develop AD dementia as Caucasians. We investigated whether race affects the association between SCCs and objective memory performance. Methods: we used a composite of three SCC questionnaires, and three challenging episodic memory tests. We studied 289 (61% female; African-American n = 47) clinically normal older individuals. Two hierarchical linear regressions assessed the modifying role of race on the association between SCC and objective memory performance. The first regression was conducted on the full sample, while the second matched the racial groups on age, estimated verbal IQ and socioeconomic status. Results: in the full sample, both groups reported similar levels of SCCs, P = 0.10, although African-Americans performed worse on the memory tasks, P < 0.001. No group differences were observed in the matched sample. The SCC × race interaction term was nonsignificant in the full sample, β = 0.109, P = 0.09, but was significant in the matched sample, β = 0.422, P = 0.037. While a significant correlation was observed between SCCs and memory among Caucasians, r = -0.401, the correlation was not found among African-Americans, r = -0.052. Conclusions: results suggest that the dissociation between SCCs and memory performance in African-Americans may indicate qualitative differences in how diverse groups endorse cognitive concerns, even after considering socioeconomic and educational factors.
Objective: subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) have been proposed as a means of identifying individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the utility of SCCs has not been well-explored for African-Americans, who are twice as likely to develop AD dementia as Caucasians. We investigated whether race affects the association between SCCs and objective memory performance. Methods: we used a composite of three SCC questionnaires, and three challenging episodic memory tests. We studied 289 (61% female; African-American n = 47) clinically normal older individuals. Two hierarchical linear regressions assessed the modifying role of race on the association between SCC and objective memory performance. The first regression was conducted on the full sample, while the second matched the racial groups on age, estimated verbal IQ and socioeconomic status. Results: in the full sample, both groups reported similar levels of SCCs, P = 0.10, although African-Americans performed worse on the memory tasks, P < 0.001. No group differences were observed in the matched sample. The SCC × race interaction term was nonsignificant in the full sample, β = 0.109, P = 0.09, but was significant in the matched sample, β = 0.422, P = 0.037. While a significant correlation was observed between SCCs and memory among Caucasians, r = -0.401, the correlation was not found among African-Americans, r = -0.052. Conclusions: results suggest that the dissociation between SCCs and memory performance in African-Americans may indicate qualitative differences in how diverse groups endorse cognitive concerns, even after considering socioeconomic and educational factors.
Authors: R S Wilson; D A Bennett; J L Bienias; N T Aggarwal; C F Mendes De Leon; M C Morris; J A Schneider; D A Evans Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-12-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Dan Mungas; Bruce R Reed; Deborah Cahn-Weiner; William Jagust; Kathleen Baynes; Charles Decarli Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kathryn V Papp; Rebecca E Amariglio; Elizabeth C Mormino; Trey Hedden; Maria Dekhytar; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Liesi E Hebert; Paul A Scherr; Denis A Evans; Carlos F Mendes de Leon Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Zoe Arvanitakis; Sue E Leurgans; Debra A Fleischman; Julie A Schneider; Kumar B Rajan; Jeremy J Pruzin; Raj C Shah; Denis A Evans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: James A Bourgeois; Malcolm John; Roland Zepf; Meredith Greene; Steven Frankel; Nancy A Hessol Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Lisa V Graves; Emily C Edmonds; Kelsey R Thomas; Alexandra J Weigand; Shanna Cooper; Ariana M Stickel; Zvinka Z Zlatar; Alexandra L Clark; Mark W Bondi Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Frank Jessen; Rebecca E Amariglio; Rachel F Buckley; Wiesje M van der Flier; Ying Han; José Luis Molinuevo; Laura Rabin; Dorene M Rentz; Octavio Rodriguez-Gomez; Andrew J Saykin; Sietske A M Sikkes; Colette M Smart; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Michael Wagner Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Samantha E John; Sarah A Evans; John Hanfelt; David W Loring; Felicia C Goldstein Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Fabian W Corlier; Crystal Shaw; Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Dan Mungas; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; M Maria Glymour; Rachel A Whitmer; Elizabeth R Mayeda Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2020 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jeanine M Parisi; Neika Sharifian; George W Rebok; Adrienne T Aiken-Morgan; Alden L Gross; Laura B Zahodne Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2021-08