| Literature DB >> 29088097 |
Arnau Panisello-Roselló1, Eva Verde2, Mohamed Amine Zaouali3, Marta Flores4, Norma Alva5, Alexandre Lopez6, Emma Folch-Puy7, Teresa Carbonell8, Georgina Hotter9, René Adam10, Joan Roselló-Catafau11.
Abstract
The 26S proteasome is the central proteolytic machinery of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), which is involved in the degradation of ubiquitinated protein substrates. Recently, UPS inhibition has been shown to be a key factor in fatty liver graft preservation during organ cold storage using University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and Institute Georges Lopez (IGL-1) solutions. However, the merits of IGL-1 and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solutions for fatty liver preservation have not been compared. Fatty liver grafts from obese Zücker rats were preserved for 24 h at 4 °C. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT), glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), ATP, adenosine monophosphate protein kinase (AMPK), e-NOS, proteasome activity and liver polyubiquitinated proteins were determined. IGL-1 solution prevented ATP breakdown during cold-storage preservation of steatotic livers to a greater extent than HTK solution. There were concomitant increases in AMPK activation, e-NOS (endothelial NOS (NO synthase)) expression and UPS inhibition. UPS activity is closely related to the composition of the solution used to preserve the organ. IGL-1 solution provided significantly better protection against ischemia-reperfusion for cold-stored fatty liver grafts than HTK solution. The effect is exerted through the activation of the protective AMPK signaling pathway, an increase in e-NOS expression and a dysregulation of the UPS.Entities:
Keywords: AMPK and nitric oxide; ATP; HTK; IGL-1; cold ischemic injury; fatty liver preservation; ubiquitin proteasome system
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29088097 PMCID: PMC5713257 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18112287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Comparison between histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) and Institute Georges Lopez (IGL-1) preservation solutions components.
| Electrolyte (m·mol/L) | IGL-1 | HTK | Colloids (g/L) | IGL-1 | HTK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K+ | 25 | 9 | Polyethylene glycol-35 | 1 | |
| Na+ | 125 | 15 | |||
| Mg2+ | 5 | 4 | |||
| Cl− | 50 | ||||
| SO42− | 5 | ||||
| Buffers (m·mol/L) | Antioxydants (m·mol/L) | ||||
| Diphosphate | 25 | Glutathione | 3 | ||
| Histidine | 180 | ||||
| Histidine-HO | 18 | Allopurinol | 1 | ||
| Tryptophan | 2 | ||||
| Impermeants (m·mol/L ) | Precursors (m·mol/L ) | ||||
| Raffinose | 30 | Adenosine | 5 | ||
| Lactobionic acid | 100 | Ketoglutarate | 1 | ||
| Mannitol | 30 | pH | 7.4 | 7.2 | |
| Osmolarity | 290 | 310 |
Figure 1Liver injury (A) and mitochondrial damage (B) in fatty liver grafts preserved in Institute Georges Lopez (IGL-1) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) vs. SHAM. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05 represent significant differences vs. SHAM and # p < 0.05 vs. IGL-1.
Figure 2Histology hematoxylin–eosin staining. Photomicrographs of livers at 20× magnification: (A) Control group showing normal hepatic architecture with macro- and micro-vesicular fatty infiltration; (B) HTK group. Extensive areas of cell dissociation, cell swelling and disintegration of hepatic architecture are seen (C) IGL group. Well-preserved lobular architecture with minimal sinusoidal dilatation and cell swelling are observed.
Figure 3Energy breakdown (ATP failure) (A) and chymotriptic-like activity ATP-dependent (26S) and ATP-independent (20S) (B) determination. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 represent significant differences versus SHAM and # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus IGL-1.
Figure 4Proteasome 20S and 19S (A) and ubiquitinated protein level changes (B) in liver grafts preserved in IGL-1 and HTK solutions vs. SHAM. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of n from 3 to 6 (SHAM n = 3; IGL-1 n = 6 and HTK n = 5). (A) Representative Western blots of 20S and 19S at the bottom and densitometric analysis at the top. * p < 0.05 versus SHAM and # p < 0.05 versus IGL-1. (B) The blot for ubiquitinated protein detection was stripped (using a mild stripping protocol) and reprobed for β-actin (using a different secondary, anti-rabbit for ubiquitin, anti-mouse for β-actin). Representative Western blots of ubiquitin at the bottom and densitometric analysis at the top. ## p < 0.01 versus IGL-1.
Figure 5p-AMPK/AMPK (A) and p-e-NOS/e-NOS (B) protein levels in steatotic liver grafts preserved in IGL-1 and HTK solutions vs. SHAM. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6). (A) # p < 0.01 represent significant differences versus IGL-1. (B) # p < 0.01 represent significant differences versus IGL-1. * p < 0.01 represent significant differences versus SHAM.
Figure 6Differential protective mechanisms in fatty liver preservation during graft cold storage. Increases (green arrows) and decreases (red arrows) are represented at each side of the scheme (left side corresponding to IGL-1 solution and right side corresponding to HTK solution).