Literature DB >> 26036479

Comparison Between IGL-1 and HTK Preservation Solutions in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

M H Meine1, I Leipnitz2, M L Zanotelli3, E S Schlindwein2, G Kiss2, J Martini2, A de Medeiros Fleck2, M Mucenic2, A de Mello Brandão4, C A Marroni4, G P Craco Cantisani3.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of liver preservation solutions remains in evidence. Cold ischemia time, steatosis, expanded criterion donors, operational cost, and survival represent important roles in its success. In a prospective cohort study between August 2009 and April 2014, 178 patients were allocated into an Institut Georges Lopez - 1 (IGL-1) solution group (63.5%) or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) group (36.5%). There were no differences among recipient's characteristics including age, skin color, gender, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, acute rejection, cholestasis, and reperfusion syndrome incidences. Also, donors, age average, skin color, donor risk index, time in intensive care unit, hemodynamic variables, infections, and steatosis incidences were similar. The average cold ischemia time was 494 minutes in the IGL-1 group and 489 minutes in the HTK group (P = .77). Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase serum levels on the first postoperative day were 707 and 1185 mg/dL, respectively, with IGL-1 and 1298 and 2291 mg/dL, respectively, with HTK (P = .016) and similar at day 15 (P > .88). The incidence of delayed graft function was 4.5% with IGL-1 and 4.6% with HTK (P = .90). The incidence primary nonfunction was 2.7% with IGL-1 and 3.1% with HTK (P = .71). The incidence of perioperative death was 11.5% with IGL-1 and 13.8% with HTK (P = .94). The survival in 30 months was 86% in IGL-1 group and 82% in HTK group (P = .66). Both preservation solutions are efficient to liver transplantations with deceased donors. Major prospective trials are necessary to evaluate each preservation solution's particularities. The preservation solution availability in each transplantation center must guide its use at the present moment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26036479     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of cold in situ perfusion and preservation of the hepatic allograft: Working toward a unified approach.

Authors:  Ahmer M Hameed; Jerome M Laurence; Vincent W T Lam; Henry C Pleass; Wayne J Hawthorne
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  The Relevance of the UPS in Fatty Liver Graft Preservation: A New Approach for IGL-1 and HTK Solutions.

Authors:  Arnau Panisello-Roselló; Eva Verde; Mohamed Amine Zaouali; Marta Flores; Norma Alva; Alexandre Lopez; Emma Folch-Puy; Teresa Carbonell; Georgina Hotter; René Adam; Joan Roselló-Catafau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Cytoprotective Mechanisms in Fatty Liver Preservation against Cold Ischemia Injury: A Comparison between IGL-1 and HTK.

Authors:  Arnau Panisello-Roselló; Eva Verde; Alexandre Lopez; Marta Flores; Emma Folch-Puy; Anabela Rolo; Carlos Palmeira; Georgina Hotter; Teresa Carbonell; René Adam; Joan Roselló-Catafau
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Compared efficacy of preservation solutions on the outcome of liver transplantation: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ágnes Lilla Szilágyi; Péter Mátrai; Péter Hegyi; Eszter Tuboly; Daniella Pécz; András Garami; Margit Solymár; Erika Pétervári; Márta Balaskó; Gábor Veres; László Czopf; Bastian Wobbe; Dorottya Szabó; Juliane Wagner; Petra Hartmann
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.