Literature DB >> 29087259

Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus.

D R Azizoddin1, S Weinberg1, N Gandhi1, S Arora2, J A Block1, W Sequeira1, M Jolly1.   

Abstract

Objectives LupusPRO has shown good measurement properties as a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For the purpose of clinical trials, the version 1.7 (v1.7) domain of Pain-Vitality was separated into distinct Pain, Vitality and Sleep domains in v1.8, and the psychometric properties examined. Methods A total of 131 consecutive SLE patients were self-administered surveys assessing fatigue (FACIT, SF-36), pain (Pain Inventory, SF-36), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index), emotional health (PHQ-9, SF-36) and quality of life (SF-36, LupusPRO) at routine care visits. Internal consistency reliability (ICR) for each domain was obtained using Cronbach's alpha. The convergent construct validity of LupusPRO domains with corresponding SF-36 domains or tools were tested using Spearman correlation. Varimax rotations were conducted to assess factor structures of the LupusPRO v1.8. Results Mean (SD) age was 40.04 (14.10) years. Scores from the LupusPRO-Sleep domain strongly correlated with insomnia scores, while LupusPRO-Vitality correlated strongly with fatigue (FACIT) and SF-36 vitality. The LupusPRO-Pain domain correlated strongly with pain (SF36 Bodily-Pain, Pain Inventory) scores. Similarly, the LupusPRO domains of Physical and Emotional Health had significant correlations with corresponding SF-36 domains. The ICR for HRQoL and non-HRQoL were 0.96 and 0.81. LupusPRO (domains HRQoL and QoL) scores correlated with disease activity. Principal component analysis included seven factor loadings presenting for the HRQOL subscales (combined Sleep, Vitality, and Pain), and three factors for the NHRQoL (Combined Coping and Social Support). Conclusions LupusPRO v1.8 (including its Sleep, Vitality, and Pain domains) has acceptable reliability and validity. Use of LupusPRO as an outcome measure in clinical trials would facilitate responsiveness assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systemic lupus erythematosus; clinical outcomes; patient-centered care; patient-reported outcome measure; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29087259     DOI: 10.1177/0961203317739128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus        ISSN: 0961-2033            Impact factor:   2.911


  7 in total

1.  Systematic review of digital and non-digital non-pharmacological interventions that target quality of life and psychological outcomes in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Angela Chang; Nathan W Winquist; Annie B Wescott; Emily G Lattie; Andrea K Graham
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 2.911

2.  Patient-Reported Outcome Information Collected from Lupus Patients Using a Mobile Application: Compliance and Validation.

Authors:  Kristy Bell; Claire Dykas; Bridget Muckian; Brooke Williams; Hope Rainey; Maggy Comberg; Mary Mora; Katherine A Owen; Peter E Lipsky
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2021-11-10

3.  Pilot study of an internet-based pain coping skills training program for patients with systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Kelli D Allen; Tyler Beauchamp; Christine Rini; Francis J Keefe; Kim L Bennell; Rebecca J Cleveland; Kimberlea Grimm; Katie Huffman; David G Hu; Andres Santana; Shruti Saxena Beem; Julie Walker; Saira Z Sheikh
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2021-06-17

4.  Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey.

Authors:  Julie A Birt; Monica A Hadi; Nashmel Sargalo; Ella Brookes; Paul Swinburn; Leslie Hanrahan; Karin Tse; Natalia Bello; Kirstin Griffing; Maria E Silk; Laure A Delbecque; Diane Kamen; Anca D Askanase
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  Patient-reported outcome measures for use in clinical trials of SLE: a review.

Authors:  Zara Izadi; Julie Gandrup; Patricia P Katz; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-21

6.  Capturing the patient experience in systemic lupus erythematosus: Are widely used measures fit-for-purpose and adherent to FDA PRO guidance recommendations?

Authors:  Kayleigh R Majercak; Eleanor M Perfetto; Ester Villalonga-Olives
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 7.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Can Lupus Patients Take the Driver's Seat in Their Disease Monitoring?

Authors:  Ioannis Parodis; Paul Studenic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.