Literature DB >> 33779388

Systematic review of digital and non-digital non-pharmacological interventions that target quality of life and psychological outcomes in adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Angela Chang1,2, Nathan W Winquist1,3, Annie B Wescott4, Emily G Lattie1,2, Andrea K Graham1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) experience psychological comorbidities and impaired quality of life (QOL). We conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for improving psychological outcomes and/or QOL in patients with SLE. To expand on a previous systematic review in this area and enhance our understanding of efficacious interventions for this population, our search included quasi-experimental and experimental studies of interventions delivered or supported by remote methods (including digitally) or in person.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted with a research librarian using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered before data extraction on the international prospective register of systematic reviews PROSPERO Web site (CRD42020154962). The search included controlled-vocabulary and title/abstract terms related to non-pharmacological interventions for SLE published through October 2019 in MEDLINE (Ovid), Cochrane Library databases (Wiley), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Web of Science (Clarivate), ACM Digital (Association of Computer Machinery), and IEEE Xplore. Studies were synthesized using a systematic narrative synthesis framework. Risk of bias was assessed.
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies were included: 21 randomized controlled trials and two quasi-experimental studies. Non-pharmacological diet, physical activity, psychological, and course-based interventions improved QOL and psychological outcomes, and were delivered in traditional settings (e.g., hospital) or remotely. No studies assessing digital non-pharmacological interventions were identified in our search. Quality assessments showed serious risk of bias for the two quasi-experimental studies, and high risk of bias in a subset of experimental studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-pharmacological interventions benefit patients with SLE. Future research should include more representative samples in rigorous evaluations and consider ways to incorporate digital technologies to increase accessibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Systemic lupus erythematous; non-pharmacological interventions; psychological outcomes; quality of life; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33779388      PMCID: PMC8122052          DOI: 10.1177/09612033211005085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lupus        ISSN: 0961-2033            Impact factor:   2.911


  49 in total

1.  Mobile health technologies for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review.

Authors:  L O Dantas; S Weber; M C Osani; R R Bannuru; T E McAlindon; S Kasturi
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.911

2.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Health outcome improvements in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using two telephone counseling interventions.

Authors:  J S Austin; R S Maisiak; D M Macrina; L W Heck
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1996-10

4.  Effects of a self-management course for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Kyeong Yae Sohng
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy on Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: 
A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kamal Solati; Mohammad Mousavi; Soleiman Kheiri; Ali Hasanpour-Dehkordi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-09

6.  Psychosocial dimensions of SLE: implications for the health care team.

Authors:  Nancy L Beckerman; Charles Auerbach; Irene Blanco
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-04-05

Review 7.  Quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus and its measurement.

Authors:  Marzena Olesińska; Agata Saletra
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2018-02-28

8.  Impact of fatigue on health-related quality of life and illness perception in a monocentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Elena Elefante; Chiara Tani; Chiara Stagnaro; Francesco Ferro; Alice Parma; Linda Carli; Viola Signorini; Dina Zucchi; Umberto Peta; Adele Santoni; Leonardo Raffaelli; Marta Mosca
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-02

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Patient Perspective on Using Digital Resources to Address Unmet Needs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Jennifer H Ra; Jerik Leung; Elizabeth A Baker; Alfred H J Kim
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.178

View more
  1 in total

1.  ACT for Lupus: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Novel Web-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Program for Patients With Lupus.

Authors:  Emily M McCormick; Tessa R Englund; Rebecca J Cleveland; Teresa A Dickson; Crystal E Schiller; Saira Z Sheikh
Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol       Date:  2022-04-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.