Literature DB >> 34164800

Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey.

Julie A Birt1, Monica A Hadi2, Nashmel Sargalo3, Ella Brookes3, Paul Swinburn3, Leslie Hanrahan4, Karin Tse4, Natalia Bello1, Kirstin Griffing1, Maria E Silk1, Laure A Delbecque5, Diane Kamen6, Anca D Askanase7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients' experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO).
METHODS: A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS.
RESULTS: Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were "completely" or "somewhat satisfied" with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered "burdensome" or "very burdensome" for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as "very important" were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician's goals for their therapy matched their own goals "very" or "somewhat closely." Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months.
CONCLUSION: SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcomes; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Treatment goals; Treatment satisfaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34164800     DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00328-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Ther        ISSN: 2198-6576


  22 in total

1.  Remission in systemic lupus erythematosus: testing different definitions in a large multicentre cohort.

Authors:  Francesca Saccon; Margherita Zen; Mariele Gatto; Domenico Paolo Emanuele Margiotta; Antonella Afeltra; Fulvia Ceccarelli; Fabrizio Conti; Alessandra Bortoluzzi; Marcello Govoni; Giulia Frontini; Gabriella Moroni; Francesca Dall'Ara; Angela Tincani; Viola Signorini; Marta Mosca; Anna Chiara Frigo; Luca Iaccarino; Andrea Doria
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  George Bertsias; Dimitrios T Boumpas; Antonis Fanouriakis; Myrto Kostopoulou; Alessia Alunno; Martin Aringer; Ingeborg Bajema; John N Boletis; Ricard Cervera; Andrea Doria; Caroline Gordon; Marcello Govoni; Frédéric Houssiau; David Jayne; Marios Kouloumas; Annegret Kuhn; Janni L Larsen; Kirsten Lerstrøm; Gabriella Moroni; Marta Mosca; Matthias Schneider; Josef S Smolen; Elisabet Svenungsson; Vladimir Tesar; Angela Tincani; Anne Troldborg; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Jörg Wenzel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Patient- and Physician-reported Satisfaction With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment in US Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Katie Pascoe; Steve Lobosco; David Bell; Ben Hoskin; David J Chang; Bonnie Pobiner; Sulabha Ramachandran
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Learning from discordance in patient and physician global assessments of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity.

Authors:  C Neville; A E Clarke; L Joseph; P Belisle; D Ferland; P R Fortin
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  The caregiver burden in lupus: findings from UNVEIL, a national online lupus survey in the United States.

Authors:  S Al Sawah; R P Daly; S A Foster; A N Naegeli; K Benjamin; H Doll; G Bond; O Moshkovich; G S Alarcón
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 2.911

6.  Disease-specific patient reported outcome tools for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Meenakshi Jolly; A Simon Pickard; Joel A Block; Rajan B Kumar; Rachel A Mikolaitis; Caitlyn T Wilke; Roger A Rodby; Louis Fogg; Winston Sequeira; Tammy O Utset; Thomas F Cash; Iona Moldovan; Emmanuel Katsaros; Perry Nicassio; Mariko L Ishimori; Mark Kosinsky; Joan T Merrill; Michael H Weisman; Daniel J Wallace
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000.

Authors:  Dafna D Gladman; Dominique Ibañez; Murray B Urowitz
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Determinants of discordance between patients and physicians in their assessment of lupus disease activity.

Authors:  Jim C Yen; Michal Abrahamowicz; Patricia L Dobkin; Ann E Clarke; Renaldo N Battista; Paul R Fortin
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Real-world medication use and economic outcomes in incident systemic lupus erythematosus patients in the United States.

Authors:  Furaha Kariburyo; Lin Xie; Janvi Sah; Nan Li; Jennifer H Lofland
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.448

10.  Satisfaction with control of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: physician and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Neelufar Mozaffarian; Steve Lobosco; Peng Lu; Adam Roughley; Gabriela Alperovich
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical Value of Serum Neuron-Specific Enolase Combined with Serum S100B Protein in the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Xiaogang Zhang; Fukun Wang; Xia Chuai
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.009

2.  Cross-sectional study of the effects of self-efficacy on fatigue and pain interference in black women with systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of depression, age and education.

Authors:  Cristina Drenkard; Kirk Easley; Gaobin Bao; Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas; S Sam Lim; Teresa Brady
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.