Literature DB >> 27439512

Ixcatec ethnoecology: plant management and biocultural heritage in Oaxaca, Mexico.

Selene Rangel-Landa1,2, Alejandro Casas3, Erandi Rivera-Lozoya4, Ignacio Torres-García1, Mariana Vallejo-Ramos4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studying motives of plant management allows understanding processes that originated agriculture and current forms of traditional technology innovation. Our work analyses the role of native plants in the Ixcatec subsistence, management practices, native plants biocultural importance, and motivations influencing management decisions. Cultural and ecological importance and management complexity may differ among species according with their use value and availability. We hypothesized that decreasing risk in availability of resources underlies the main motives of management, but curiosity, aesthetic, and ethical values may also be determinant.
METHODS: Role of plants in subsistence strategies, forms of use and management was documented through 130 semi-structured interviews and participant observation. Free listing interviews to 38 people were used to estimate the cognitive importance of species used as food, medicine, fuel, fodder, ornament and ceremonial. Species ecological importance was evaluated through sampling vegetation in 22 points. Principal Components Analysis were performed to explore the relation between management, cultural and ecological importance and estimating the biocultural importance of native species.
RESULTS: We recorded 627 useful plant species, 589 of them native. Livelihood strategies of households rely on agriculture, livestock and multiple use of forest resources. At least 400 species are managed, some of them involving artificial selection. Management complexity is the main factor reflecting the biocultural importance of plant species, and the weight of ecological importance and cultural value varied among use types. Management strategies aim to ensure resources availability, to have them closer, to embellish human spaces or satisfying ethical principles.
CONCLUSION: Decisions about plants management are influenced by perception of risk to satisfy material needs, but immaterial principles are also important. Studying such relation is crucial for understanding past and present technological innovation processes and understand the complex process of developing biocultural legacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocultural heritage; Cultural value; Domestication; Ethnoecology; Ixcatec; Plant management; Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27439512      PMCID: PMC4955254          DOI: 10.1186/s13002-016-0101-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed        ISSN: 1746-4269            Impact factor:   2.733


  9 in total

1.  The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from northeastern Brazil: an assessment based on use value.

Authors:  Reinaldo Farias Paiva de Lucena; Patricia Muniz de Medeiros; Elcida de Lima Araújo; Angelo Giuseppe Chaves Alves; Ulysses Paulino de Albuquerque
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity?

Authors:  Shonil A Bhagwat; Katherine J Willis; H John B Birks; Robert J Whittaker
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Bad Year Economics. Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty. Paul Halstead and John O'Shea, Eds. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989. x, 145 pp., illus. $49.50. New Directions in Archaeology.

Authors:  B Winterhalder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica.

Authors:  Alejandro Casas; Adriana Otero-Arnaiz; Edgar Pérez-Negrón; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Influence of traditional markets on plant management in the Tehuacán Valley.

Authors:  Yaayé Arellanes; Alejandro Casas; Anselmo Arellanes; Ernesto Vega; José Blancas; Mariana Vallejo; Ignacio Torres; Selene Rangel-Landa; Ana I Moreno; Leonor Solís; Edgar Pérez-Negrón
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  TEK, local perceptions of risk, and diversity of management practices of Agave inaequidens in Michoacán, Mexico.

Authors:  Ignacio Torres; José Blancas; Alejandro León; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.733

7.  Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico.

Authors:  José Blancas; Alejandro Casas; Diego Pérez-Salicrup; Javier Caballero; Ernesto Vega
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Plant management and biodiversity conservation in Náhuatl homegardens of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico.

Authors:  Carolina Larios; Alejandro Casas; Mariana Vallejo; Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles; José Blancas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Vulnerability and risk management of Agave species in the Tehuacán Valley, México.

Authors:  América Delgado-Lemus; Ignacio Torres; José Blancas; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.733

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Sociocultural and ecological factors influencing management of edible and non-edible plants: the case of Ixcatlán, Mexico.

Authors:  Selene Rangel-Landa; Alejandro Casas; Eduardo García-Frapolli; Rafael Lira
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 2.  Use and management of wild fauna by people of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley and surrounding areas, Mexico.

Authors:  Mariana Zarazúa-Carbajal; Michelle Chávez-Gutiérrez; Yessica Romero-Bautista; Selene Rangel-Landa; Ana Isabel Moreno-Calles; Luis Fernando Alvarado Ramos; Sandra E Smith; José Blancas; Ek Del Val; María Del Coro Arizmendi; Alejandro Casas
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  Temporal and Spatial Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Pinus densata and Its Drivers in Shangri-La, CHINA.

Authors:  Dongfan Xu; Jialong Zhang; Rui Bao; Yi Liao; Dongyang Han; Qianwei Liu; Tao Cheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Ethnoecology of the interchange of wild and weedy plants and mushrooms in Phurépecha markets of Mexico: economic motives of biotic resources management.

Authors:  Berenice Farfán-Heredia; Alejandro Casas; Ana I Moreno-Calles; Eduardo García-Frapolli; Aída Castilleja
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.733

5.  Cultural, economic, and ecological factors influencing management of wild plants and mushrooms interchanged in Purépecha markets of Mexico.

Authors:  Berenice Farfán-Heredia; Alejandro Casas; Selene Rangel-Landa
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Patterns in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge: a case study from Arnhem Land, Australia.

Authors:  Aung Si
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.733

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.