Literature DB >> 29080955

Fusion of CT coronary angiography and whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac MR perfusion: building a framework for comprehensive cardiac imaging.

Jochen von Spiczak1, Robert Manka2,3,4, Alexander Gotschy3,4, Sabrina Oebel2,3, Sebastian Kozerke4, Sandra Hamada2, Hatem Alkadhi2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a framework for 3D fusion of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion (3D-CMR-Perf) image data-correlating coronary artery stenoses to stress-induced myocardial perfusion deficits for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Twenty-three patients who underwent CTCA and 3D-CMR-Perf for various indications were included retrospectively. For CTCA, image quality and coronary diameter stenoses > 50% were documented. For 3D-CMR-Perf, image quality and stress-induced perfusion deficits were noted. A software framework was developed to allow for 3D image fusion of both datasets. Computation steps included: (1) fully automated segmentation of coronary arteries and heart contours from CT; (2) manual segmentation of the left ventricle in 3D-CMR-Perf images; (3) semi-automatic co-registration of CT/CMR datasets; (4) projection of the 3D-CMR-Perf values on the CT left ventricle. 3D fusion analysis was compared to separate inspection of CTCA and 3D-CMR-Perf data. CT and CMR scans resulted in an image quality being rated as good to excellent (mean scores 3.5 ± 0.5 and 3.7 ± 0.4, respectively, scale 1-4). 3D-fusion was feasible in all 23 patients, and perfusion deficits could be correlated to culprit coronary lesions in all but one case (22/23 = 96%). Compared to separate analysis of CT and CMR data, coronary supply territories of 3D-CMR-Perf perfusion deficits were refined in two cases (2/23 = 9%), and the relevance of stenoses in CTCA was re-judged in four cases (4/23 = 17%). In conclusion, 3D fusion of CTCA/3D-CMR-Perf facilitates anatomic correlation of coronary lesions and stress-induced myocardial perfusion deficits thereby helping to refine diagnostic assessment of CAD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography (CT); Coronary artery disease; Hybrid imaging; Image fusion; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080955     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1260-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  40 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  High resolution three-dimensional cardiac perfusion imaging using compartment-based k-t principal component analysis.

Authors:  Viton Vitanis; Robert Manka; Daniel Giese; Henrik Pedersen; Sven Plein; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The feasibility of sub-millisievert coronary CT angiography with low tube voltage, prospective ECG gating, and a knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Chul Hwan Park; Joohee Lee; Chisuk Oh; Kyung Hwa Han; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Fusion imaging: combined visualization of 3D reconstructed coronary artery tree and 3D myocardial scintigraphic image in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  T H Schindler; N Magosaki; M Jeserich; U Oser; T Krause; R Fischer; E Moser; E Nitzsche; M Zehender; H Just; U Solzbach
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1999-10

5.  Three-dimensional cardiac image fusion using new CT angiography and SPECT methods.

Authors:  Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Shinya Shiraishi; Seiji Tomiguchi; Tsuyoshi Honda; Hisao Ogawa; Kazuo Awai; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Validation of a new cardiac image fusion software for three-dimensional integration of myocardial perfusion SPECT and stand-alone 64-slice CT angiography.

Authors:  Oliver Gaemperli; Tiziano Schepis; Victor Kalff; Mehdi Namdar; Ines Valenta; Laurent Stefani; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Lars Husmann; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Combined non-invasive anatomical and functional assessment with MSCT and MRI for the detection of significant coronary artery disease in patients with an intermediate pre-test likelihood.

Authors:  Jacob M van Werkhoven; Mark W Heijenbrok; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Ernst E van der Wall; Joop H M Schreur; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.

Authors:  Nam Ju Lee; Harold Litt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Matthias Paul; Sven Plein; Gerry P McCann; Ajay M Shah; Michael S Marber; Amedeo Chiribiri; Geraint Morton; Simon Redwood; Philip MacCarthy; Andreas Schuster; Masaki Ishida; Mark A Westwood; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Cost evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus coronary angiography for the diagnostic work-up of coronary artery disease: application of the European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance registry data to the German, United Kingdom, Swiss, and United States health care systems.

Authors:  Karine Moschetti; Stefano Muzzarelli; Christophe Pinget; Anja Wagner; Günther Pilz; Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Detle Nothnagel; Torsten Dill; Herbert Frank; Massimo Lombardi; Oliver Bruder; Heiko Mahrholdt; Jürg Schwitter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Current and future aspects of multimodal and fusion imaging in structural and coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Verena Veulemans; Katharina Hellhammer; Amin Polzin; Florian Bönner; Tobias Zeus; Malte Kelm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Multimodal Multiparametric Three-dimensional Image Fusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Combining the Best of Two Worlds.

Authors:  Jochen von Spiczak; Manoj Mannil; Hanna Model; Chris Schwemmer; Sebastian Kozerke; Frank Ruschitzka; Hatem Alkadhi; Robert Manka
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-04-16

3.  Intermodality feature fusion combining unenhanced computed tomography and ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for patient-specific vascular mapping in renal impairment.

Authors:  Takegawa Yoshida; Kim-Lien Nguyen; Puja Shahrouki; William J Quinones-Baldrich; Peter F Lawrence; J Paul Finn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 4.  Taking It Personally: 3D Bioprinting a Patient-Specific Cardiac Patch for the Treatment of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Niina Matthews; Berto Pandolfo; Daniel Moses; Carmine Gentile
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.