Literature DB >> 31734117

Intermodality feature fusion combining unenhanced computed tomography and ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for patient-specific vascular mapping in renal impairment.

Takegawa Yoshida1, Kim-Lien Nguyen2, Puja Shahrouki1, William J Quinones-Baldrich3, Peter F Lawrence3, J Paul Finn4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility of fusing complementary, high-contrast features from unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (FE-MRA) for preprocedural vascular mapping in patients with renal impairment.
METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, 15 consecutive patients underwent both FE-MRA and unenhanced CT scanning, and the complementary high-contrast features from both modalities were fused to form an integrated, multifeature image. Source images from CT and MRA were segmented and registered. To validate the accuracy, precision, and concordance of fused images to source images, unambiguous landmarks, such as wires from implantable medical devices or indwelling catheters, were marked on three-dimensional (3D) models of the respective modalities, followed by rigid co-registration, interactive fusion, and fine adjustment. We then compared the positional offsets using pacing wires or catheters in the source FE-MRA (defined as points of interest [POIs]) and fused images (n = 5 patients, n = 247 points). Points within 3D image space were referenced to the respective modalities: x (right-left), y (anterior-posterior), and z (cranial-caudal). The respective 3D orthogonal reference axes from both image sets were aligned, such that with perfect registration, a given point would have the same (x, y, z) component values in both sets. The 3D offsets (Δx mm, Δy mm, Δz mm) for each of the corresponding POIs represent nonconcordance between the source FE-MRA and fused images. The offsets were compared using concordance correlation coefficients. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients (aged 76 ± 12 years; seven female) with aortic valve stenosis and chronic kidney disease and two patients with thoracoabdominal vascular aneurysms and chronic kidney disease underwent FE-MRA for preprocedural vascular assessment, and unenhanced CT examinations were available in all patients. No ferumoxytol-related adverse events occurred. There were 247 matched POIs evaluated on the source FE-MRA and fused images. In patients with implantable medical devices, the mean offsets in spatial position were 0.31 ± 0.51 mm (ρ = 0.99; Cb = 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99-0.99) for Δx, 0.27 ± 0.69 mm (ρ = 0.99; Cb = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99-0.99) for Δy, and 0.20 ± 0.59 mm (ρ = 1; Cb = 1; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) for Δz. Interobserver agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.99). The mean difference in offset between readers was 1.5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate 3D feature fusion is feasible, combining luminal information from FE-MRA with vessel wall information on unenhanced CT. This framework holds promise for combining the complementary strengths of magnetic resonance imaging and CT to generate information-rich, multifeature composite vascular images while avoiding the respective risks and limitations of both modalities.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Endovascular; Ferumoxytol; Image fusion; Intermodality; Magnetic resonance angiography; Transcatheter; Vascular mapping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31734117      PMCID: PMC9583800          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.860


  28 in total

Review 1.  2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Sanjay Kaul; Arvind Agnihotri; Karen P Alexander; Steven R Bailey; John H Calhoon; Blase A Carabello; Milind Y Desai; Fred H Edwards; Gary S Francis; Timothy J Gardner; A Pieter Kappetein; Jane A Linderbaum; Chirojit Mukherjee; Debabrata Mukherjee; Catherine M Otto; Carlos E Ruiz; Ralph L Sacco; Donnette Smith; James D Thomas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Renal function as predictor of mortality in patients after percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Jan-Malte Sinning; Alexander Ghanem; Hannah Steinhäuser; Viktoria Adenauer; Christoph Hammerstingl; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features.

Authors:  D L Hill; D J Hawkes; J E Crossman; M J Gleeson; T C Cox; E E Bracey; A J Strong; P Graves
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Multimodality 3D-roadmap for cardiovascular interventions in congenital heart disease--a single-center, retrospective analysis of 78 cases.

Authors:  Martin Glöckler; Julia Halbfaβ; Andreas Koch; Stephan Achenbach; Sven Dittrich
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Role of CMR in TAVR.

Authors:  Toby Rogers; Ron Waksman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05

6.  Feasibility of three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography-fluoroscopy image fusion technique in guiding complex endovascular aortic procedures in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Adeline Schwein; Ponraj Chinnadurai; Dipan J Shah; Alan B Lumsden; Carlos F Bechara; Jean Bismuth
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Current and potential imaging applications of ferumoxytol for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gerda B Toth; Csanad G Varallyay; Andrea Horvath; Mustafa R Bashir; Peter L Choyke; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Edit Dosa; John Paul Finn; Seymur Gahramanov; Mukesh Harisinghani; Iain Macdougall; Alexander Neuwelt; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Prakash Ambady; Ramon Barajas; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Thomas J DeLoughery; Nancy D Doolittle; Rongwei Fu; John Grinstead; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Xin Li; Heather L McConnell; Leslie L Muldoon; Gary Nesbit; Joao P Netto; David Petterson; William D Rooney; Daniel Schwartz; Laszlo Szidonya; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 8.  Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI.

Authors:  Mustafa R Bashir; Lubna Bhatti; Daniele Marin; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR Angiography for Vascular Access Mapping before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Renal Impairment: A Step Toward Patient-specific Care.

Authors:  Kim-Lien Nguyen; John M Moriarty; Adam N Plotnik; Olcay Aksoy; Takegawa Yoshida; Richard J Shemin; William M Suh; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Cardiovascular MRI with ferumoxytol.

Authors:  J P Finn; K-L Nguyen; F Han; Z Zhou; I Salusky; I Ayad; P Hu
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 3.389

View more
  1 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography without Gadolinium-based Contrast Material: Clinical Applications Using Ferumoxytol.

Authors:  Mohammad H Jalili; Tiffany Yu; Cameron Hassani; Ashley E Prosper; J Paul Finn; Arash Bedayat
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.