Camilo Jaimes1, Henry H Cheng2, Janet Soul3, Silvina Ferradal4,5, Yogesh Rathi6, Borjan Gagoski4, Jane W Newburger2, P Ellen Grant4,7,5, Lilla Zöllei8. 1. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Laboratory of Mathematics in Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; all: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given the central role of the thalamus in motor, sensory, and cognitive development, methods to study emerging thalamocortical connectivity in early infancy are of great interest. PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of performing probabilistic tractography-based thalamic parcellation (PTbTP) in typically developing (TD) neonates and to compare the results with a pilot sample of neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD). STUDY TYPE: Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved cross-sectional study. MODEL: We prospectively recruited 20 TD neonates and five CHD neonates (imaged preoperatively). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MRI was performed at 3.0T including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and 3D magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE). ASSESSMENT: A radiologist and trained research assistants segmented the thalamus and seven cortical targets for each hemisphere. Using the thalami as seeds and the cortical labels as targets, FSL library tools were used to generate probabilistic tracts. A Hierarchical Dirichlet Process algorithm was then used for clustering analysis. A radiologist qualitatively assessed the results of clustering. Quantitative analyses were also performed. STATISTICAL TESTS: We summarized the demographic data and results of clustering with descriptive statistics. Linear regressions covarying for gestational age were used to compare groups. RESULTS: In 17 of 20 TD neonates, we identified five connectivity-determined clusters, which correlate with known thalamic nuclei and subnuclei. In four neonates with CHD we observed a spectrum of abnormalities including fewer and disorganized clusters or small supernumerary clusters (up to seven per thalamus). After covarying for differences in corrected gestational age (cGA), the fractional anisotropy (FA), volume, and normalized thalamic volume were significantly lower in CHD neonates (P < 0.01). DATA CONCLUSIONS: Using PTbTP clusters, correlating well with the location and connectivity of known thalamic nuclei, were identified in TD neonates. Differences in thalamic clustering outputs were identified in four neonates with CHD, raising concern for disordered thalamic connectivity. PTbTP is feasible in TD and CHD neonates. Preliminary findings suggest the prenatal origins of altered connectivity in CHD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1626-1637.
BACKGROUND: Given the central role of the thalamus in motor, sensory, and cognitive development, methods to study emerging thalamocortical connectivity in early infancy are of great interest. PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of performing probabilistic tractography-based thalamic parcellation (PTbTP) in typically developing (TD) neonates and to compare the results with a pilot sample of neonates with congenital heart disease (CHD). STUDY TYPE: Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved cross-sectional study. MODEL: We prospectively recruited 20 TD neonates and five CHD neonates (imaged preoperatively). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MRI was performed at 3.0T including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and 3D magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE). ASSESSMENT: A radiologist and trained research assistants segmented the thalamus and seven cortical targets for each hemisphere. Using the thalami as seeds and the cortical labels as targets, FSL library tools were used to generate probabilistic tracts. A Hierarchical Dirichlet Process algorithm was then used for clustering analysis. A radiologist qualitatively assessed the results of clustering. Quantitative analyses were also performed. STATISTICAL TESTS: We summarized the demographic data and results of clustering with descriptive statistics. Linear regressions covarying for gestational age were used to compare groups. RESULTS: In 17 of 20 TD neonates, we identified five connectivity-determined clusters, which correlate with known thalamic nuclei and subnuclei. In four neonates with CHD we observed a spectrum of abnormalities including fewer and disorganized clusters or small supernumerary clusters (up to seven per thalamus). After covarying for differences in corrected gestational age (cGA), the fractional anisotropy (FA), volume, and normalized thalamic volume were significantly lower in CHD neonates (P < 0.01). DATA CONCLUSIONS: Using PTbTP clusters, correlating well with the location and connectivity of known thalamic nuclei, were identified in TD neonates. Differences in thalamic clustering outputs were identified in four neonates with CHD, raising concern for disordered thalamic connectivity. PTbTP is feasible in TD and CHD neonates. Preliminary findings suggest the prenatal origins of altered connectivity in CHD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1626-1637.
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: M T Donofrio; Y A Bremer; R M Schieken; C Gennings; L D Morton; B W Eidem; F Cetta; C B Falkensammer; J C Huhta; C S Kleinman Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Mark W Woolrich; Saad Jbabdi; Brian Patenaude; Michael Chappell; Salima Makni; Timothy Behrens; Christian Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Katyucia de Macedo Rodrigues; Emma Ben-Avi; Danielle D Sliva; Myong-Sun Choe; Marie Drottar; Ruopeng Wang; Bruce Fischl; Patricia E Grant; Lilla Zöllei Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jason Homsy; Samir Zaidi; Yufeng Shen; James S Ware; Kaitlin E Samocha; Konrad J Karczewski; Steven R DePalma; David McKean; Hiroko Wakimoto; Josh Gorham; Sheng Chih Jin; John Deanfield; Alessandro Giardini; George A Porter; Richard Kim; Kaya Bilguvar; Francesc López-Giráldez; Irina Tikhonova; Shrikant Mane; Angela Romano-Adesman; Hongjian Qi; Badri Vardarajan; Lijiang Ma; Mark Daly; Amy E Roberts; Mark W Russell; Seema Mital; Jane W Newburger; J William Gaynor; Roger E Breitbart; Ivan Iossifov; Michael Ronemus; Stephan J Sanders; Jonathan R Kaltman; Jonathan G Seidman; Martina Brueckner; Bruce D Gelb; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Richard P Lifton; Christine E Seidman; Wendy K Chung Journal: Science Date: 2015-12-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M Dylan Tisdall; Aaron T Hess; Martin Reuter; Ernesta M Meintjes; Bruce Fischl; André J W van der Kouwe Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ala Birca; Vasily A Vakorin; Prashob Porayette; Sujana Madathil; Vann Chau; Mike Seed; Sam M Doesburg; Susan Blaser; Dragos A Nita; Rohit Sharma; Emma G Duerden; Edward J Hickey; Steven P Miller; Cecil D Hahn Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2016-08-14 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: C Jaimes; V Rofeberg; C Stopp; C M Ortinau; A Gholipour; K G Friedman; W Tworetzky; J Estroff; J W Newburger; D Wypij; S K Warfield; E Yang; C K Rollins Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 3.825