Literature DB >> 29078891

Prolonged length of stay in delayed cholecystectomy is not due to intraoperative or postoperative contributors.

Misha Bhandari1, Chad Wilson2, Kenneth Rifkind3, Charles DiMaggio3, Patricia Ayoung-Chee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is superior to delayed elective cholecystectomy. Although this practice is ideal, it requires significant hospital resources, particularly for an underprivileged inner-city population at a large, municipal hospital. We sought to evaluate the implementation of same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large, municipal hospital and assess the possible benefits of decreasing preoperative length of stay (LOS), particularly its effect on operative time and length of stay in patients with acute cholecystitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients treated for symptomatic gallstone disease between September 2012 and November 2013. Medical records were reviewed, and relevant data points were collected. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to assess the correlation between time to operation (<36 h [no delay] or >36 h [delay]) and the main outcomes (operative time and total length of stay). Inclusion criteria were patients age ≥18 y who underwent same-admission cholecystectomy and had a diagnosis of cholecystitis on pathology. Eighty-eight patients met all inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) preoperative LOS was 76.2 (±48.6) h, the mean operative time was 2.3 (±1.1) h, and the mean postoperative LOS was 60.3 (±60.1) h. The average total LOS was 136 (±79.8) h. Operative times and postoperative LOS were similar for patients in the delay and no delay groups. Patients with >36 h wait before surgery had a total length of stay twice as long as patients with <36 h wait (152 versus 83.3 h; P = 0.0005). These findings remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, radiologic findings, number of preoperative tests, and pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased preoperative LOS is not associated with a significant increase in operative time. However, it was associated with significantly increased length of stay. Further analysis is needed to explore the potential cost savings of decreasing preoperative LOS.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cholecystitis; Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078891      PMCID: PMC5818151          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  17 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis.

Authors:  Alfonso S Serralta; Jose L Bueno; Manuel R Planells; David R Rodero
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304).

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Jens Encke; Jörg Köninger; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Kilian Weigand; Karl Kipfmüller; Oliver Schunter; Thorsten Götze; Markus T Golling; Markus Menges; Ernst Klar; Katharina Feilhauer; Wolfram G Zoller; Karsten Ridwelski; Sven Ackmann; Alexandra Baron; Michael R Schön; Helmut K Seitz; Dietmar Daniel; Wolfgang Stremmel; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Johansson; A Thune; L Nelvin; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Clinical update: early surgery for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Stylianos Germanos; Stavros Gourgiotis; Hemant M Kocher
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Tamim Siddiqui; Alisdair MacDonald; Peter S Chong; John T Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  K Gurusamy; K Samraj; C Gluud; E Wilson; B R Davidson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Same-day combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholecystectomy: Achievable and minimizes costs.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Wild; M Jabran Younus; Denise Torres; Kenneth Widom; Dianne Leonard; James Dove; Marie Hunsinger; Joseph Blansfield; David L Diehl; William Strodel; Mohsen M Shabahang
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.313

9.  Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Syed Nabeel Zafar; Augustine Obirieze; Babawande Adesibikan; Edward E Cornwell; Terrence M Fullum; Daniel D Tran
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudio Papi; Marco Catarci; Letizia D'Ambrosio; Loredana Gili; Maurizio Koch; Giovanni Battista Grassi; Lucio Capurso
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.