Literature DB >> 29078685

Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.

Marco Taurchini1, Antonello Cuttitta1.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the eight most common cancer in the world and surgical resection remains the gold standard not only in providing the optimal chance for cure but also the best palliation for dysphagia. Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that are reported as 23-50% and 2-8% in western country. At the moment no gold standard techniques exist for esophagectomy. The choice of the technique depends on several factors; location of tumor and surgeon's experience are probably the most relevant. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), performed in high volume centers, has shown to reduce the rate of complications with the same oncological outcome as open esophagectomy. The addition of robotic technique to MIE is relatively new and is gaining widespread acceptance. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is safe and feasible, and its short-term results are comparable to conventional MIE. Randomized studies are needed to assess if there is any real benefit associated to the use of the robotic approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive; esophagectomy; robotic assisted

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078685      PMCID: PMC5639027          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  37 in total

Review 1.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Vasile V Bintintan; Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Michael Reiter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  R J J Verhage; E J Hazebroek; J Boone; R Van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Bernard M Smithers; David C Gotley; Ian Martin; Janine M Thomas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Robotic Esophagectomy for Cancer: Early Results and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Benjamin Wei; Mary T Hawn; Douglas J Minnich
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-10-30

8.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M C Stirling
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes?

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Pieter van der Sluis; Richard Skipworth; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Pascal Probst; Alexander Studier-Fischer; Henrik Nienhüser; Jana Pauly; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Sebastian Weiterer; Philipp Knebel; Markus K Diener; Markus A Weigand; Markus W Büchler; Thomas Schmidt; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  Outcomes of robotic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Amy Young; José María Alvarez Gallesio; David B Sewell; Rebecca Carr; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Early implementation of a perioperative nutrition support pathway for patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Carr; Caitlin Harrington; Christina Stella; Diana Glauner; Erin Kenny; Lianne M Russo; Meghan J Garrity; Manjit S Bains; Smita Sihag; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.