Literature DB >> 33430937

Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.

Felix Nickel1, Pascal Probst1, Alexander Studier-Fischer1, Henrik Nienhüser1, Jana Pauly1, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski1, Sebastian Weiterer2, Philipp Knebel1, Markus K Diener1, Markus A Weigand2, Markus W Büchler1, Thomas Schmidt1, Beat P Müller-Stich3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The only curative treatment for most esophageal cancers is radical esophagectomy. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity, but is not yet widely established. Linear stapled anastomosis is a promising technique for MIE because it is quite feasible even without robotic assistance. The aim of the present study is to compare total MIE with linear stapled anastomosis to open esophagectomy (OE) with circular stapled anastomosis with special regard to postoperative morbidity in an expertise-based randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS/
DESIGN: This superiority RCT compares MIE with linear stapled anastomosis (intervention) to OE with circular stapled anastomosis (control) for Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. It was initiated in February 2019, and recruitment is expected to last for 3 years. For inclusion, patients must be 18 years of age or more with a resectable primary malignancy in the distal esophagus. Participants with tumor localizations above the azygos vein, metastasis, or infiltration into adjacent tissue will be excluded. In an expertise-based approach, the allocated treatment will only be carried out by the single most experienced surgeon of the surgical center for each respective technique. The sample size was calculated with 20 participants per group for the primary endpoint postoperative morbidity according to comprehensive complication index (CCI) within 30 postoperative days. Secondary endpoints include anastomotic insufficiency, pulmonary complications, other intra- and postoperative outcome parameters such as estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, short-term oncologic endpoints, adherence to a standardized fast-track protocol, postoperative pain, and postoperative recovery (QoR-15). Quality of life (SF-36, CAT EORTC QLQ-C30, CAT EORTC QLQ-OES18) and oncological outcomes are evaluated with 60 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: MIVATE is the first RCT to compare OE with circular stapled anastomosis to total MIE with linear stapled anastomosis exclusively for intrathoracic anastomosis. The expertise-based approach limits bias due to heterogeneity of surgical expertise. The use of a dedicated fast-track protocol in both OE and MIE will shed light on the role of the access strategy alone in this setting. The findings of this study will serve to define which approach has the best perioperative outcome for patients requiring esophagectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00016773 . Registered on 18 February 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circular stapled anastomosis; Comprehensive complication index; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Esophageal cancer; Expertise-based; Fast track; Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy; Linear stapled anastomosis; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430937      PMCID: PMC7798277          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04966-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  43 in total

Review 1.  Refinement of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques after 15 years of experience.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Rui Wang; Shilei Liu; James D Luketich; Sufeng Chen; Haiquan Chen; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Xiao Ma; Su Yang; Xiaoli Zhu; Wei Qin; Jiaqing Xiang; Toni Lerut; Hecheng Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison between circular- and linear-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass--a cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry.

Authors:  David Edholm; Magnus Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krle A-Jerić; Asbjørn Hrobjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Dore; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2015-12

Review 5.  Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.

Authors:  Marco Taurchini; Antonello Cuttitta
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve.

Authors:  Luis F Tapias; Christopher R Morse
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  The EORTC CAT Core-The computer adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

Authors:  Morten Aa Petersen; Neil K Aaronson; Juan I Arraras; Wei-Chu Chie; Thierry Conroy; Anna Costantini; Linda Dirven; Peter Fayers; Eva-Maria Gamper; Johannes M Giesinger; Esther J J Habets; Eva Hammerlid; Jorunn Helbostad; Marianne J Hjermstad; Bernhard Holzner; Colin Johnson; Georg Kemmler; Madeleine T King; Stein Kaasa; Jon H Loge; Jaap C Reijneveld; Susanne Singer; Martin J B Taphoorn; Lise H Thamsborg; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Galina Velikova; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Teresa Young; Mogens Groenvold
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017.

Authors:  Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Craig A Umscheid; Dale W Bratzler; Brian Leas; Erin C Stone; Rachel R Kelz; Caroline E Reinke; Sherry Morgan; Joseph S Solomkin; John E Mazuski; E Patchen Dellinger; Kamal M F Itani; Elie F Berbari; John Segreti; Javad Parvizi; Joan Blanchard; George Allen; Jan A J W Kluytmans; Rodney Donlan; William P Schecter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 9.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waresijiang Yibulayin; Sikandaer Abulizi; Hongbo Lv; Wei Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  Current Definition of and Controversial Issues Regarding Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas.

Authors:  Giovanni Marchegiani; Stefano Andrianello; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

View more
  1 in total

1.  Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Caelan M Haney; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Vasile V Bintintan; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Alberto Arezzo; Marcus Bahra; Marc G Besselink; Matthias Biebl; Luigi Boni; Michele Diana; Jan H Egberts; Lars Fischer; Nader Francis; Daniel A Hashimoto; Daniel Perez; Marlies Schijven; Moritz Schmelzle; Marek Soltes; Lee Swanstrom; Thilo Welsch; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.453

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.