Literature DB >> 29078618

Transition from video-assisted thoracic surgery to robotic pulmonary surgery.

Takashi Suda1.   

Abstract

The "da Vinci Surgical System" is a robotic surgical system that utilizes multi-jointed robotic arms and a high-resolution three-dimensional video-monitoring system. We report on the state of transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to robotic pulmonary surgery, the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to VATS, and the future of robotic surgery. Surgery utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System requires a console surgeon and assistant who have been certified by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., the system manufacturer. On the basis of the available medical literature, a robotic lobectomy has a learning curve that extends over approximately 20 cases for a surgeon who has mastered VATS. Surgery using the da Vinci System is safe, is associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than thoracotomy, leads to shorter postoperative hospital stays, and ensures improved postoperative quality of life. Currently, no prospective studies comparing it to VATS have been conducted. The various studies that have compared robotic surgery and VATS have reported different results. At the present time, the benefits to patients of robotic surgery compared to VATS remain unclear. Areas in which robotic surgery may be superior to VATS include the superior operability of robotic surgery that improves safety and decreases the incidence of complication. To show that the costly robotic surgery is superior to VATS, prospective multicenter randomized studies need to be conducted. The da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system has already been highly evaluated for its safety, with recent studies reporting satisfactory outcomes. It remains necessary to verify whether the benefits to patients justify the higher cost of robotic surgery. Future developments in the field of robotic engineering will likely lead to the creation of systems that are even less invasive and allow for more advanced surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robot; lung; minimally invasive surgery; robotics; thoracoscopy/VATS

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078618      PMCID: PMC5637952          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  19 in total

1.  Single-port thymectomy through an infrasternal approach.

Authors:  Takashi Suda; Hiroshi Sugimura; Daisuke Tochii; Mariko Kihara; Yoshinobu Hattori
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Mercedes de la Torre; Ricardo Fernandez; Victor X Mosquera
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-08-09

3.  Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study.

Authors:  Hee-Jin Jang; Hyun-Sung Lee; Seong Yong Park; Jae Ill Zo
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2011-09

4.  Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?

Authors:  Benjamin E Lee; Robert J Korst; Elaine Kletsman; John R Rutledge
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward Houck; Clark Beeman Fuller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy For Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy.

Authors:  Hao-Xian Yang; Kaitlin M Woo; Camelia S Sima; Manjit S Bains; Prasad S Adusumilli; James Huang; David J Finley; Nabil P Rizk; Valerie W Rusch; David R Jones; Bernard J Park
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).

Authors:  Scott J Swanson; Daniel L Miller; Robert Joseph McKenna; John Howington; M Blair Marshall; Andrew C Yoo; Matthew Moore; Candace L Gunnarsson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic-assisted vs thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Subroto Paul; Jessica Jalbert; Abby J Isaacs; Nasser K Altorki; O Wayne Isom; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Incidence, Results, and Our Current Intraoperative Technique to Control Major Vascular Injuries During Minimally Invasive Robotic Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Kyle M Bess; Benjamin Wei; Douglas J Minnich
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Farid Gharagozloo; Marc Margolis; Barbara Tempesta; Eric Strother; Farzad Najam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  7 in total

1.  Postoperative pain after lobectomy: robot-assisted, video-assisted and open thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Augustinus P T van der Ploeg; Ninos Ayez; George P Akkersdijk; Charles C van Rossem; Peter D de Rooij
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Technical and operational modifications required for evolving robotic programs performing anatomic pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Benjamin Smood; Asem Ghanim; Benjamin Wei; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-01-23

3.  Current status of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Masato Kanzaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Real-Time Fluorescence Imaging in Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Priyanka Das; Sheena Santos; G Kate Park; I Hoseok; Hak Soo Choi
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-05

Review 5.  Current trends in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Toyofumi F Chen-Yoshikawa; Takayuki Fukui; Shota Nakamura; Toshinari Ito; Yuka Kadomatsu; Hideki Tsubouchi; Harushi Ueno; Tomoshi Sugiyama; Masaki Goto; Shunsuke Mori; Naoki Ozeki; Shuhei Hakiri; Koji Kawaguchi
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.131

6.  Robotic and Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Comparison of Long-Term Pain at a Single Centre.

Authors:  Alberto Testori; Veronica Maria Giudici; Emanuele Voulaz; Marco Alloisio; Edoardo Bottoni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Report on 153 sequential three-incision robotic-assisted pulmonary resections by a single surgeon: technical details and learning curve.

Authors:  Muyun Peng; Xiang Wang; Chen Chen; Sichuang Tan; Wenliang Liu; Fenglei Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.