Literature DB >> 29363007

Technical and operational modifications required for evolving robotic programs performing anatomic pulmonary resection.

Benjamin Smood1, Asem Ghanim2, Benjamin Wei2, Robert J Cerfolio3,4.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to review the complicated and often confusing technical changes required when converting from the Si robotic system to the Xi when performing pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy. We reviewed a prospective database of a consecutive series of patients who intended to undergo robotic lobectomy or segmentectomy by one surgeon. There were 101 lobectomies and 25 segmentectomies performed on the Si robot in 2015-2016, and 95 lobectomies and 28 segmentectomies in 2016 on the Xi robot. The two groups were similar for age, height, weight, pulmonary function, anatomic resections, and co-morbidities. Technical differences in robotic arm numbering, port placement, and instrumentation are shown below. Median docking time was shorter with the Xi robot [7.5 (95% CI 6-8) versus 10 (95% CI 9-12) min, p = 0.003] as was operation duration [114 (95% CI 104-123) versus 119 (95% CI 116-126) min, p = 0.041] and skin closure to room exit [12 (95% CI 10-24) versus 13 (95% CI 12-15) min, p = 0.081]. Anesthesiologists expressed greater comfort with the Xi system, because the patient's head was not covered by the robot. Outcomes for Si and Xi operations such as median blood loss (20 cc versus 20 cc), transfusion rate (0 versus 0), major complication rate (3.2 versus 3.3%), and the 30- and 90-day mortality were no different (one 30-day death in the Si group). The technical changes that are required for robotic Si-to-Xi conversion are shown. The Xi system may offer improved operational efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lobectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic; Segmentectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363007     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0779-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  17 in total

1.  Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant; Loki Skylizard; Douglas James Minnich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches.

Authors:  Shaun A Deen; Jennifer L Wilson; Candice L Wilshire; Eric Vallières; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Robson E Ely; Brian E Louie
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Robotic Lung Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Wei; Shady M Eldaif; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 5.  Robotic Lobectomy and Segmentectomy: Technical Details and Results.

Authors:  Benjamin Wei; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Nationwide Assessment of Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ravi Rajaram; Sanjay Mohanty; David J Bentrem; Emily S Pavey; David D Odell; Ankit Bharat; Karl Y Bilimoria; Malcolm M DeCamp
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier).

Authors:  Scott J Swanson; Daniel L Miller; Robert Joseph McKenna; John Howington; M Blair Marshall; Andrew C Yoo; Matthew Moore; Candace L Gunnarsson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database.

Authors:  Michael Kent; Thomas Wang; Richard Whyte; Thomas Curran; Raja Flores; Sidhu Gangadharan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  One Hundred Planned Robotic Segmentectomies: Early Results, Technical Details, and Preferred Port Placement.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Caroline Watson; Douglas J Minnich; Sandra Calloway; Benjamin Wei
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Use and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Zhifei Sun; Paul J Speicher; Shakir M Saud; Brian C Gulack; Matthew G Hartwig; David H Harpole; Mark W Onaitis; Betty C Tong; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.