Literature DB >> 29078526

Robotic esophagectomy.

Brett Broussard1, John Evans1, Benjamin Wei2, Robert Cerfolio2.   

Abstract

Robotic esophagectomy is an increasingly used modality. Patients who are candidates for traditional, open esophagectomy are typically also candidates for robotic esophagectomy. Knowledge of and training on the robotic platform is critical for success. Patient and port positioning is described. Either a hand-sewn or stapled intrathoracic anastomosis may be performed. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) appears to be associated with decreased respiratory complications versus open esophagectomy. Robotic esophagectomy may be performed with excellent perioperative outcomes, though long-term oncologic data regarding the operation are not yet available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic; esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)

Year:  2016        PMID: 29078526      PMCID: PMC5638557          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2016.07.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  23 in total

Review 1.  Technique and role of minimally invasive esophagectomy for premalignant and malignant diseases of the esophagus.

Authors:  Andrew F Pierre; James D Luketich
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Esophagectomy combined with aortic segment replacement for esophageal cancer invading the aorta.

Authors:  Zhuangzhuang Cong; Qiang Diao; Jun Yi; Lei Xiong; Haiwei Wu; Tao Qin; Hua Jing; Demin Li; Yi Shen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  As originally published in 1993: En bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. Updated in 1996.

Authors:  J M Collard
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  N T Nguyen; D M Follette; B M Wolfe; P D Schneider; P Roberts; J E Goodnight
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

6.  Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery.

Authors:  W S Melvin; B J Needleman; K R Krause; C Schneider; R K Wolf; R E Michler; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Jingpei Li; Yaxing Shen; Lijie Tan; Mingxiang Feng; Hao Wang; Yong Xi; Qun Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Shobhit Arya; Alan Karthikesalingam; George B Hanna
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.