Hui K Gan1,2,3, David A Reardon4, Andrew B Lassman5, Ryan Merrell6, Martin van den Bent7, Nicholas Butowski8, Zarnie Lwin9, Helen Wheeler10, Lisa Fichtel11, Andrew M Scott1,2,3, Erica J Gomez12, JuDee Fischer12, Helen Mandich12, Hao Xiong12, Ho-Jin Lee12, Wijith P Munasinghe12, Lisa A Roberts-Rapp12, Peter J Ansell12, Kyle D Holen12, Priya Kumthekar13. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health and Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2. School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Neurology & Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 7. Neuro-Oncology Unit, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA. 9. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 10. Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 11. South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 12. AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA. 13. Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
Background: We recently reported an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), formerly called ABT-414, plus radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (arm A). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of depatux-m, either in combination with temozolomide in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma (arm B) or as monotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma (arm C). Methods: In this multicenter phase I dose escalation study, patients received depatux-m (0.5-1.5 mg/kg in arm B, 1.25 mg/kg in arm C) every 2 weeks by intravenous infusion. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy were also determined. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled as of March 1, 2016. The most frequent toxicities were ocular, occurring in 35/38 (92%) patients. Keratitis was the most common grade 3 adverse event observed in 6/38 (16%) patients; thrombocytopenia was the most common grade 4 event seen in 5/38 (13%) patients. The MTD was set at 1.5 mg/kg in arm B and was not reached in arm C. RP2D was declared as 1.25 mg/kg for both arms. Depatux-m demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile. In recurrent glioblastoma patients, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 30.8% and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. Best Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology responses were 1 complete and 2 partial responses. Conclusion: Depatux-m alone or in combination with temozolomide demonstrated an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile in glioblastoma. Further studies are currently under way to evaluate its efficacy in newly diagnosed (NCT02573324) and recurrent glioblastoma (NCT02343406).
Background: We recently reported an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m), formerly called ABT-414, plus radiation and temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (arm A). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of depatux-m, either in combination with temozolomide in newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma (arm B) or as monotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma (arm C). Methods: In this multicenter phase I dose escalation study, patients received depatux-m (0.5-1.5 mg/kg in arm B, 1.25 mg/kg in arm C) every 2 weeks by intravenous infusion. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy were also determined. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled as of March 1, 2016. The most frequent toxicities were ocular, occurring in 35/38 (92%) patients. Keratitis was the most common grade 3 adverse event observed in 6/38 (16%) patients; thrombocytopenia was the most common grade 4 event seen in 5/38 (13%) patients. The MTD was set at 1.5 mg/kg in arm B and was not reached in arm C. RP2D was declared as 1.25 mg/kg for both arms. Depatux-m demonstrated a linear pharmacokinetic profile. In recurrent glioblastomapatients, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 30.8% and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. Best Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology responses were 1 complete and 2 partial responses. Conclusion:Depatux-m alone or in combination with temozolomide demonstrated an acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profile in glioblastoma. Further studies are currently under way to evaluate its efficacy in newly diagnosed (NCT02573324) and recurrent glioblastoma (NCT02343406).
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin Journal: Cell Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: W K Yung; M D Prados; R Yaya-Tur; S S Rosenfeld; M Brada; H S Friedman; R Albright; J Olson; S M Chang; A M O'Neill; A H Friedman; J Bruner; N Yue; M Dugan; S Zaknoen; V A Levin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edward B Reilly; Andrew C Phillips; Fritz G Buchanan; Gillian Kingsbury; Yumin Zhang; Jonathan A Meulbroek; Todd B Cole; Peter J DeVries; Hugh D Falls; Christine Beam; Jinming Gu; Enrico L Digiammarino; Joann P Palma; Cherrie K Donawho; Neal C Goodwin; Andrew M Scott Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Joon H Uhm; Karla V Ballman; Wenting Wu; Caterina Giannini; J C Krauss; Jan C Buckner; C D James; Bernd W Scheithauer; Robert J Behrens; Patrick J Flynn; Paul L Schaefer; Shaker R Dakhill; Kurt A Jaeckle Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Alba A Brandes; Roy Rampling; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Johan M Kros; Antoine F Carpentier; Paul M Clement; Marc Frenay; Mario Campone; Jean-Francois Baurain; Jean-Paul Armand; Martin J B Taphoorn; Alicia Tosoni; Heidemarie Kletzl; Barbara Klughammer; Denis Lacombe; Thierry Gorlia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew C Phillips; Erwin R Boghaert; Kedar S Vaidya; Michael J Mitten; Suzanne Norvell; Hugh D Falls; Peter J DeVries; Dong Cheng; Jonathan A Meulbroek; Fritz G Buchanan; Laura M McKay; Neal C Goodwin; Edward B Reilly Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; Paul Mulholland; Bart Neyns; L Burt Nabors; Mario Campone; Antje Wick; Warren Mason; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn S Ashby; John Degroot; Rao Gattamaneni; Lawrence Cher; Mark Rosenthal; Franz Payer; Juliane M Jürgensmeier; Rakesh K Jain; A Gregory Sorensen; John Xu; Qi Liu; Martin van den Bent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David A Reardon; Andrew B Lassman; Martin van den Bent; Priya Kumthekar; Ryan Merrell; Andrew M Scott; Lisa Fichtel; Erik P Sulman; Erica Gomez; JuDee Fischer; Ho-Jin Lee; Wijith Munasinghe; Hao Xiong; Helen Mandich; Lisa Roberts-Rapp; Peter Ansell; Kyle D Holen; Hui K Gan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Julia Canestraro; Malin Hultcrantz; Shanu Modi; Paul A Hamlin; Alexander N Shoushtari; Jason A Konner; William P Tew; Neil M Iyengar; Murk Heinemann; David H Abramson; Jasmine H Francis Journal: Cornea Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 3.152
Authors: Stephen J Bagley; Shawn Kothari; Rifaquat Rahman; Eudocia Q Lee; Gavin P Dunn; Evanthia Galanis; Susan M Chang; Louis Burt Nabors; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Roger Stupp; Minesh P Mehta; David A Reardon; Stuart A Grossman; Erik P Sulman; John H Sampson; Simon Khagi; Michael Weller; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mustafa Khasraw Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-02-15 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Glenwood D Goss; Everett E Vokes; Michael S Gordon; Leena Gandhi; Kyriakos P Papadopoulos; Drew W Rasco; JuDee S Fischer; Katharine L Chu; William W Ames; Rajendar K Mittapalli; Ho-Jin Lee; Jiewei Zeng; Lisa A Roberts-Rapp; Lise I Loberg; Peter J Ansell; Edward B Reilly; Christopher J Ocampo; Kyle D Holen; Anthony W Tolcher Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Martin van den Bent; Hui K Gan; Andrew B Lassman; Priya Kumthekar; Ryan Merrell; Nicholas Butowski; Zarnie Lwin; Tom Mikkelsen; Louis B Nabors; Kyriakos P Papadopoulos; Marta Penas-Prado; John Simes; Helen Wheeler; Tobias Walbert; Andrew M Scott; Erica Gomez; Ho-Jin Lee; Lisa Roberts-Rapp; Hao Xiong; Earle Bain; Peter J Ansell; Kyle D Holen; David Maag; David A Reardon Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.333