PURPOSE: Amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene represents one of the most frequent gene alterations in glioblastoma (GBM). In the current study, we evaluated gefitinib, a potent EGFR inhibitor, in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-eight patients (96 evaluable) were accrued between May 18, 2001, and August 2, 2002. All were newly diagnosed GBM patients who were clinically and radiographically stable/improved after radiation treatment (enrollment within 5 weeks of radiation completion). No prior chemotherapy was permitted. EGFR amplification/mutation, as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, was not required for treatment with gefitinib but was studied when tissues were available. Gefitinib was administered at 500 mg each day; for patients receiving dexamethasone or enzyme-inducing (CYP3A4) agents, dose was escalated to a maximum of 1,000 mg QD. Treatment cycles were repeated at 4-week intervals with brain magnetic resonance imaging at 8-week intervals. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS; calculated from time of initial surgery) at 1 year (primary end point) with gefitinib was 54.2%, which was not statistically different compared with that of historical control population (48.9%, data from three previous Phase III North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies of newly diagnosed GBM patients). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year post-RT (16.7%) was also not significantly different to that of historical controls (30.3%). Clinical outcome was not affected by EGFR status (amplification or vIII mutation). Fatigue (41%), rash (62%), and loose stools (58%) constituted the most frequent adverse events, the majority of these being limited to Grade 1/2. Of note, the occurrence of drug-related adverse effects, such as loose stools was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: In our evaluation of nearly 100 patients with newly diagnosed GBM, treatment with adjuvant gefitinib post-radiation was not associated with significant improvement in OS or PFS. However, patients who experienced gefitinib-associated adverse effects (rash/diarrhea) did demonstrate improved OS.
PURPOSE: Amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene represents one of the most frequent gene alterations in glioblastoma (GBM). In the current study, we evaluated gefitinib, a potent EGFR inhibitor, in the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-eight patients (96 evaluable) were accrued between May 18, 2001, and August 2, 2002. All were newly diagnosed GBM patients who were clinically and radiographically stable/improved after radiation treatment (enrollment within 5 weeks of radiation completion). No prior chemotherapy was permitted. EGFR amplification/mutation, as assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, was not required for treatment with gefitinib but was studied when tissues were available. Gefitinib was administered at 500 mg each day; for patients receiving dexamethasone or enzyme-inducing (CYP3A4) agents, dose was escalated to a maximum of 1,000 mg QD. Treatment cycles were repeated at 4-week intervals with brain magnetic resonance imaging at 8-week intervals. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS; calculated from time of initial surgery) at 1 year (primary end point) with gefitinib was 54.2%, which was not statistically different compared with that of historical control population (48.9%, data from three previous Phase III North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies of newly diagnosed GBM patients). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year post-RT (16.7%) was also not significantly different to that of historical controls (30.3%). Clinical outcome was not affected by EGFR status (amplification or vIII mutation). Fatigue (41%), rash (62%), and loose stools (58%) constituted the most frequent adverse events, the majority of these being limited to Grade 1/2. Of note, the occurrence of drug-related adverse effects, such as loose stools was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: In our evaluation of nearly 100 patients with newly diagnosed GBM, treatment with adjuvant gefitinib post-radiation was not associated with significant improvement in OS or PFS. However, patients who experienced gefitinib-associated adverse effects (rash/diarrhea) did demonstrate improved OS.
Authors: Ingo K Mellinghoff; Maria Y Wang; Igor Vivanco; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Shaojun Zhu; Ederlyn Q Dia; Kan V Lu; Koji Yoshimoto; Julie H Y Huang; Dennis J Chute; Bridget L Riggs; Steve Horvath; Linda M Liau; Webster K Cavenee; P Nagesh Rao; Rameen Beroukhim; Timothy C Peck; Jeffrey C Lee; William R Sellers; David Stokoe; Michael Prados; Timothy F Cloughesy; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T A Libermann; H R Nusbaum; N Razon; R Kris; I Lax; H Soreq; N Whittle; M D Waterfield; A Ullrich; J Schlessinger Journal: Nature Date: 1985 Jan 10-18 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Qi-Wen Fan; Christine Cheng; Zachary A Knight; Daphne Haas-Kogan; David Stokoe; C David James; Frank McCormick; Kevan M Shokat; William A Weiss Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Jeremy N Rich; David A Reardon; Terry Peery; Jeannette M Dowell; Jennifer A Quinn; Kara L Penne; Carol J Wikstrand; Lauren B Van Duyn; Janet E Dancey; Roger E McLendon; James C Kao; Timothy T Stenzel; B K Ahmed Rasheed; Sandra E Tourt-Uhlig; James E Herndon; James J Vredenburgh; John H Sampson; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ezra E W Cohen; Fred Rosen; Walter M Stadler; Wendy Recant; Kerstin Stenson; Dezheng Huo; Everett E Vokes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martin J van den Bent; Alba A Brandes; Roy Rampling; Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven; Johan M Kros; Antoine F Carpentier; Paul M Clement; Marc Frenay; Mario Campone; Jean-Francois Baurain; Jean-Paul Armand; Martin J B Taphoorn; Alicia Tosoni; Heidemarie Kletzl; Barbara Klughammer; Denis Lacombe; Thierry Gorlia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher E Pelloski; Karla V Ballman; Alfred F Furth; Li Zhang; E Lin; Erik P Sulman; Krishna Bhat; J Matthew McDonald; W K Alfred Yung; Howard Colman; Shiao Y Woo; Amy B Heimberger; Dima Suki; Michael D Prados; Susan M Chang; Fred G Barker; Jan C Buckner; C David James; Kenneth Aldape Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kenneth D Aldape; Karla Ballman; Alfred Furth; Jan C Buckner; Caterina Giannini; Peter C Burger; Bernd W Scheithauer; Robert B Jenkins; C David James Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Lu Liu; L Magnus Bäcklund; Bo R Nilsson; Dan Grandér; Koichi Ichimura; Helena M Goike; V Peter Collins Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2005-08-26 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Jingwen Yao; Catalina Raymond; David A Nathanson; Ararat Chakhoyan; Jeremy Simpson; James S Garner; Alan G Olivero; Lars U Mueller; Jordi Rodon; Elizabeth Gerstner; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zammam Areeb; Stanley S Stylli; Thomas M B Ware; Nicole C Harris; Lipi Shukla; Ramin Shayan; Lucia Paradiso; Bo Li; Andrew P Morokoff; Andrew H Kaye; Rodney B Luwor Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 3.064