Literature DB >> 29075927

Effects of the concentration of digestive surgical operations in regional Japan.

Takefumi Kitazawa1, Kunichika Matsumoto1, Shigeru Fujita1, Kanako Seto1, Yinghui Wu2, Takayoshi Nagahama1, Tomonori Hasegawa3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the concentration of digestive system surgery and outcomes at a regional level in Japan, using time-series data.
METHODS: We used nationwide data from 2008 to 2013, and analyzed the ten most common surgical procedures. The unit of analysis was secondary medical areas (SMAs), which cover several municipalities and provide medical services for common diseases. The concentration of surgery in these areas was measured using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and the relationship between the concentration of surgery and length of stay in hospital (LOS) was analyzed, in accordance with surgical difficulty.
RESULTS: There was a downward trend in both the HHI and LOS from 2008 to 2013. SMAs showing an upward trend in the HHI (increased concentration) were associated with a greater reduction in LOS than those showing a downward trend for eight surgical procedures. For three easy surgical procedures, increased concentration of surgery was significantly associated with a reduction in LOS. After adjustment for trends in the aging population and the surgical volume in 2008, an increasing concentration for three easy surgical procedures was significantly related to a reduction in the LOS.
CONCLUSION: Concentrating relatively easy surgical procedures at a regional level may be associated with a reduction in LOS.

Keywords:  Gastrointestinal surgical procedures; Herfindahl–Hirschman Index; Surgical volume

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29075927     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-017-1601-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  15 in total

1.  Measuring competition in health care markets.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Fatality from three common surgical conditions in teaching and non-teaching hospitals.

Authors:  J A LEE; S L MORRISON; J N MORRIS
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1957-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization.

Authors:  V E P P Lemmens; K Bosscha; G van der Schelling; S Brenninkmeijer; J W W Coebergh; I H J T de Hingh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Centralization of pediatric heart surgery in Sweden.

Authors:  N R Lundström; H Berggren; G Björkhem; P Jögi; J Sunnegârdh
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Elderly Patients Strongly Benefit from Centralization of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Lydia G M van der Geest; Marc G H Besselink; Olivier R C Busch; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Casper H J van Eijck; Cees H C Dejong; Valery E P P Lemmens
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Does concentration of surgical expertise improve outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? 9 year audit cycle.

Authors:  S Andrews
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.392

8.  Effect of centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on nationwide hospital mortality and length of stay.

Authors:  B Topal; S Van de Sande; S Fieuws; F Penninckx
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.

Authors:  Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Centralization of esophageal cancer surgery: does it improve clinical outcome?

Authors:  M W J M Wouters; H E Karim-Kos; S le Cessie; B P L Wijnhoven; L P S Stassen; W H Steup; H W Tilanus; R A E M Tollenaar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  1 in total

1.  Associations of centralization with health care quality for gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy in China.

Authors:  Jiafu Ji; Leiyu Shi; Xiangji Ying; Xinpu Lu; Fei Shan; Haibo Wang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 5.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.