| Literature DB >> 29075520 |
Jun Chen1,2, Chun-Lei Wang1, Shan Wu1, Shan He1, Jun Ren3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of high-resolution ultrasonography for the diagnosis of polyneuropathy in diabetes mellitus patients by the examination of the ulnar nerves.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes mellitus; high-resolution ultrasonography; peripheral; ulnar nerve
Year: 2017 PMID: 29075520 PMCID: PMC5647610 DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2017.0024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ultrason ISSN: 2084-8404
Fig. 1A. Inlet of the cubital tunnel in the diabetic peripheral neuropathy group. The ulnar nerve is depicted by bright arrows. The cross-section of the ulnar nerve is 0.179 mm2, the nerve is the circular hypoechoic structure. ME: medial epicondyle. B. Inlet of the cubital tunnel in the diabetes mellitus group; the nerve is the oval hypoechoic structure. ME: medial epicondyle. The cross-section of the ulnar nerve is 0.90 mm2. C. Inlet of the cubital tunnel in the control group. The cross-section of the ulnar nerve is 0.87mm2: the nerve is the oval hypoechoic structure
Basic data of subjects
| Characteristics | Control group | Diabetes mellitus group | Diabetic peripheral neuropathy group |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100 | 60 | 40 |
|
| 58.5 ± 7.7 | 61.5 ± 7.0 | 59.6 ± 6.9 |
|
| 59/41 | 33/27 | 18/22 |
|
| 168.7 ± 8.9 | 164.4 ± 7.6 | 160.7 ± 6.8 |
|
| 51.3 ± 6.8 | 55.8 ± 7.1 | 53.6 ± 6.2 |
|
| 100/100 | 60/60 | 40/40 |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
There were no obvious significant differences in age, height, weight when we compared the diabetes mellitus group and the diabetic peripheral neuropathy group with the control group.
Compared with the control group p > 0.05.
Compared with the diabetes mellitus group p > 0.05.
CSA of ulnar nerve on both sides in the control group (mean ± SD) (mm2)
| Control group | Number | Mid-humerus | Inlet of the cubital tunnel | Outlet of the cubital tunnel | Upon the medial epicondyle | 6 cm upon the wrist crease | Guyon tunnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100 | 5.58 ± 1.33 | 6.40 ± 1.39 | 6.31 ± 1.31 | 5.89 ± 1.47 | 5.02 ± 1.27 | 4.82 ± 1.17 |
|
| 100 | 5.62 ± 1.36 | 6.37 ± 1.37 | 6.21 ± 1.29 | 5.85 ± 1.38 | 4.98 ± 1.16 | 4.91 ± 1.28 |
|
| 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.92 |
P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
CSA of ulnar nerve in two sides (mean ± SD) (mm2)
| Group | Number | Mid-humerus | Inlet of the cubital tunnel | Outlet of the cubital tunnel | Upon the medial epicondyle | 6 cm upon the wrist crease | Guyon tunnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100 | 5.60 ± 1.34 | 6.38 ± 1.38 | 6.26 ± 1.29 | 5.87 ± 1.49 | 5.00 ± 1.26 | 4.86 ± 1.16 |
|
| 60 | 5.61 ± 1.30 | 6.39 ± 1.35 | 6.99 ± 1.41 | 5.75 ± 1.37 | 5.10 ± 1.15 | 5.56 ± 1.27 |
|
| 40 | 5.74 ± 1.37 | 7.29 ± 1.56 | 7.58 ± 1.50 | 5.92 ±1.45 | 5.31 ± 1.24 | 5.98 ± 1.45 |
P-value was calculated by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc comparison.
Compared with the CSA of the ulnar nerve in the control group p < 0.05.
Compared with the CSA of the ulnar nerve in the control group p > 0.05.
Compared with the CSA of the ulnar nerve in the diabetes mellitus group p > 0.05.
Parameters of ultrasound testing between men and women in the control group (mean ± SD) (mm2)
| Control group | Number | Mid-humerus | Inlet of the cubital tunnel | Outlet of the cubital tunnel | Upon the medial epicondyle | 6 cm upon the wrist crease | Guyon tunnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 50 | 5.94 ± 1.38 | 6.42 ± 1.38 | 6.30 ± 1.36 | 6.18 ± 1.49 | 5.10 ± 1.27 | 4.80 ± 1.16 |
|
| 50 | 5.36 ± 1.31 | 6.35 ± 1.33 | 6.22 ± 1.30 | 5.38 ± 1.35 | 4.90 ± 1.17 | 4.93 ± 1.29 |
|
| 0.01 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.02 | 0.75 | 0.92 |
P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Fig. 2The three groups compared in a histogram