| Literature DB >> 29075506 |
Sietske Grijseels1, Jens Christian Nielsen2, Jens Nielsen2,3, Thomas Ostenfeld Larsen1, Jens Christian Frisvad1, Kristian Fog Nielsen1, Rasmus John Normand Frandsen1, Mhairi Workman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Penicillium species are important producers of bioactive secondary metabolites. However, the immense diversity of the fungal kingdom is only scarcely represented in industrial bioprocesses and the upscaling of compound production remains a costly and labor intensive challenge. In order to facilitate the development of novel secondary metabolite producing processes, two routes are typically explored: optimization of the native producer or transferring the enzymatic pathway into a heterologous host. Recent genome sequencing of ten Penicillium species showed the vast amount of secondary metabolite gene clusters present in their genomes, and makes them accessible for rational strain improvement. In this study, we aimed to characterize the potential of these ten Penicillium species as native producing cell factories by testing their growth performance and secondary metabolite production in submerged cultivations.Entities:
Keywords: Cell factory; Penicillium; Physiology; Secondary metabolite; Submerged fermentation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29075506 PMCID: PMC5644182 DOI: 10.1186/s40694-017-0036-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fungal Biol Biotechnol ISSN: 2054-3085
Fig. 1Fermentation profiles of ten Penicillium species cultivated in 1 L bioreactors in DM and CM. All fermentations were performed in biological triplicates. The CO2 exhaust values (%) are shown for all triplicate experiments separately as solid lines (right Y-axis), the dry weight (g/L) values are shown as a mean with standard deviations as black circles (left Y-axis) and for the defined medium the glucose concentrations are shown as mean with standard deviations as open circles (left Y-axis). Light orange shaded area shows the exponential phase and light grey shaded area shows the non-exponential phase. For P. polonicum one of the triplicate experiments showed a different growth curve, for this fermentation only the CO2 profile is shown. Triangles are the time points were samples for secondary metabolite analysis were taken. The third sample point in P. decumbens was at 120 h and falls therefore outside the figure. For P. steckii in DM the samples for secondary metabolite analysis were taken from a different experiment with similar growth characteristics
Physiological characteristics of ten Penicillium species cultivated in 1 L bioreactors in DM and CM
| Species | Biomass yield growth phase (Ysx) | Lag phase | Morphology | Lag phase | Morphology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.58 ± 0.05 | 14.3 ± 0.5 | Small clumps/dispersed | 10.9 ± 0.3 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.17 | 22.5 ± 0.8 | Dispersed | 14.5 ± 0.1 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.37 ± 0.03 | 23.3 ± 0.6 | Pellet | 12.2 ± 0.6 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.55 ± 0.02 | 17.8 ± 0.9 | Dispersed | 13.8 ± 0.2 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.54 ± 0.14 | 37.6 ± 1.4 | Pellet + clumps + wall | 18.3 ± 0.2 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.25 ± 0.01 | 30.3 ± 1.7 | Wall growth | 11.3 ± 0.1 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.58 ± 0.03 | 19.7 ± 0.2 | Dispersed | 12.5 ± 0.1 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.37 ± 0.02 | 10.9 ± 2.3 | Pellet + wall growth | 13.5 ± 0.2 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.29 ± 0.13 | 19.9 ± 1.2 | Pellet + wall growth | 9.9 ± 0.2 | Dispersed |
|
| 0.67 ± 0.04 | 21.4 ± 0.4 | Dispersed | 14.0 ± 0.8 | Dispersed |
Biomass yield on glucose (g DW/g glucose), duration of lag phase (h) and observed morphology at the time point where the CO2 was at its maximum
Fig. 2Length of non-exponential growth phase of ten Penicillium species cultivated in 1 L bioreactors in DM and CM. Non-exponential growth phase was the time in hours between the end of exponential growth phase and the maximum CO2 off gas value. Bars show average and standard deviation if triplicate submerged fermentations. P. flavigenum in DM, P. polonicum in CM and P. solitum in CM showed exponential growth until the maximum CO2 off gas value
Fig. 3Maximum specific growth rates and maximum CO2 production rates for ten Penicillium species cultivated in 1 L bioreactors in DM and CM. Dark grey bars: maximum specific growth rates µmax (h−1) and standard deviations calculated by linear regression of minimum three biomass dry weight data points during the exponential phase. For P. vulpinum, P. polonicum, P. steckii, and P. solitum in DM there were less than three dry weight samples during exponential phase and therefore µmax could not be calculated. Light grey bars: maximum production rate of CO2 (h−1) and standard deviations calculated by linear regression of accumulated CO2 values during exponential growth. All values are based on independent triplicate fermentations, except for the ones with an asterix; there the values are based on duplicate fermentations
Fig. 4Base peak chromatograms (BPCs) of extracted samples of biological triplicates of P. nalgiovense and P. vulpinum fermentations in CM and DM. The BPCs of the triplicates are shown in red, dark orange and light orange. BPCs show peaks with the similar retention times and comparable peak areas. Peak with asterisk showed a slight change of retention times but have the same molecular features
Metabolites produced in different growth phases of ten Penicillium species
Column 3: metabolites (and their id numbers) identified with dereplication, in order of retention time. Column 4, 5 and 6: per sample the total amount of molecular features (identified and unknown metabolites), in between brackets the id number of the identified compounds in each sample. A heat map from yellow to dark orange follows the total amount of molecular features in the samples
aConfirmed with a reference standard