| Literature DB >> 29075005 |
Pamela J Walsh1,2, Susan A Clarke3, Matthew Julius4, Phillip B Messersmith5,6.
Abstract
Porous silica is an attractive biomaterial in many applications, including drug-delivery systems, bone-graft fillers and medical devices. The issue with porousEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29075005 PMCID: PMC5658353 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13285-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Cyclotella meneghiniana cell wall visualisation. Scanning electron micrographs (a–d): (a) Valves (v) and girdle bands (gb) from deconstructed diatom frustules. (b) External valve view complete frustule 22 μm. (c) Valve margin showing process openings (po), silica granules (sg), and spines (sp). (d) Upper valve (v) with girdle bands intact (gb). Atomic force micrographs (e,f) illustrating C. meneghiniana’s true 3D cell wall morphology. (e) Valve face of complete frustule 7 μm, circle indicates area panel d enlargement. (f) 1.5 μm ×1.5 μm scan of cell wall alveolous.
Figure 2X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy survey scan (a) Diatom (b) Diatom Amine (linker APTMS), (c) Diatom Thiol (linkerMPDMS) at binding energy range of 0 to 600Ev (d) N 1s peak (e) C 1s peak (f) S 2p peak (g) Si 2p peak for diatom functionalised with amine compared to unfunctionalised, (h) N 1s peak (i) C 1s peak (j) S 2p peak (k) Si 2p peak for diatom unctionalised with thiol compared to unfunctionalised.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data for surface modification of C. meneghiniana grafted with functional groups.
| Diatom Substrate Used | Concentrations | Samples | C/Si | O/Si | S/Si | N/Si | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Study |
| Atomic |
| 1.54 | 2.06 | 0 | 0.16 |
|
| 4.17 | 2.65 | 0 | 0.97 | |||
|
| 2.88 | 2.26 | 0.41 | 0.22 | |||
| Cicco[ |
| Undefined |
| 2.40 | 5.00 | 0.66 | Not Reported |
|
| 16.00 | 4.80 | 0.73 | Not Reported | |||
|
| 3.39 | 2.60 | 0.40 | Not Reported | |||
| Fowler[ | Diatomaceous earth | Atomic |
| 5.32 | 2.01 | 0.64 | 0.11 |
| Yang[ | Diatomaceous earth | Atomic |
| 1.34 | 3.22 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 1.55 | 2.62 | 0 | 0.17 |
Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Analysis for bulk characterisation of surface modification of C. meneghiniana grafted with functional groups (–SH and –NH2); n = 6.
| Samples | %C | %H | %N | %S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diatom | 9.85 (±1.75) | 2.09 (±0.34) | 1.25 (±0.17) | <0.5 |
| Diatom Amine | 12.65 (±1.01) | 2.30 (±0.11) | 2.25 (±0.60) | <0.5 |
| Diatom Thiol | 11.09 (±0.7) | 2.33 (±0.18) | <0.5 | 0.93(±0.25) |
Figure 3Scanning electron micrographs of C. meneghiniana (a) Diatom (g) Diatom Amine (linker APTMS), (m) Diatom Thiol (linker MPDMS). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental maps of diatom (b,h,n) oxygen signal, (c,i,o) silica signal, (d,j,p) carbon signal, (e,k,q) nitrogen signal, (f,f,r) sulphur signal. The scale bar in the SEM images (a,g and m) is the same scale for each image in the panel.
Figure 4Biological Response of J774.2 macrophages grown on diatom frustules (a) LDH release measuring cytotoxicity after 24 hrs, (b) cell proliferation, solid bars represent 24 h and hatched bars represent 72 h in culture, Error bars indicate ±1 SD, N = 3 for a and b. (c to f) fluorescence microscopy images of live/dead stained J774 cells (green = live; red = dead) after 24 hrs in culture, (c) cells (d) Diatom (e) Diatom Amine (f) Diatom Thiol (g) quantitative J774 cell viability determined from image analysis. Error bars indicate ±1 SD. N = 6/image × N 3 replicate wells.
Figure 5(a) Silica ion release profile of C. meneghiniana determined by Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-OES), solid bars represent 24 h and hatched bars represent 72 h in culture. Error bars indicate ±1 SD, N = 3. Dose response profile of J774.2 macrophages (b) diatom frustules (C. meneghiniana) in culture for 24 h, (c) Conditioned media (C. meneghiniana) in culture for 24 h.
Figure 6Pro-Inflammatory response of J774.2 macrophages grown on diatom frustules (a) TNF-α and (b) IL-1α release. Error barsindicate ±1 SD, N = 3.
Figure 7Scanning electron micrographs (a) C. meneghiniana (b) Triceratium dubium (c) Melosira varians (d to f) Diatomaceous earth (Note: this material is a crude mixtures of different species of fossilised diatoms, images represent image particles found in the mixture).
Figure 8Biological Response of J774.2 macrophages and primary human bone marrow stromal cells (hBMSC) grown on diatoms listed in Fig. 7. (a) LDH release of J774.2 macrophages grown on diatom frustules (solid bar), conditioned media (lined bar) for 24 h. Cell proliferation of J774.2 macrophages grown on diatom frustules (solid bar), conditioned media (lined bar) for (b) 24 h (c) 72 h. (d) LDH release of hBMSC grown on (solid bar), conditioned media (lined bar) for 24 h. Cell proliferation of hBMSC grown on (solid bar), conditioned media (lined bar) for (e) 24 h (f) 72 h.